Planning Atlas
Planning AtlasBarnetBurnt Oak ward26/0952/HSE
Planning application · Barnet

26/0952/HSE.

12 Grange Road Edgware HA8 0PP

Householder at 12 Grange Road Edgware HA8 0PP, received 12 Mar 2026 — refused on 7 May 2026 (delegated, Bradley Carson).

BarnetBurnt OakHA8 0PP26/0952/HSE
ApprovedRefusedOther
At a glance · this applicationBarnet profile →
Refused
Outcome
7 May 2026
8 wks
Decision time
inside the 8-week target
Conditions
not captured
9
Documents
9 linked
0
Objections
0 in support
No
Appeal
none recorded
Record from the Barnet planning register as captured; documents link to the council's own files. Nearby applications are context, not part of this application.
Application

What is it?

Single storey side/rear extension following demolition of the existing conservatory

Reference
26/0952/HSE
Type
Householder Application
Applicant
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Postcode
HA8 0PP
Council
Received
12 Mar 2026
Decision date
7 May 2026
Decision route
Delegated (officer)
Status
Refused
Reference
26/0952/HSE
Type
Householder Application
Show all 14 rows
Applicant
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Postcode
HA8 0PP
Council
Received
12 Mar 2026
Decision date
7 May 2026
Decision route
Delegated (officer)
Status
Refused
Documents

What was filed?

Document
Published
View
DELEGATED REPORT
8 May 2026
DN: REFUSE HSE
7 May 2026
SITE NOTICE
24 Mar 2026
APPLICATION FORM - WITHOUT PERSONAL DATA
12 Mar 2026
COMMUNITY INFRASTRUCTURE LEVY - COMPLETED FORM
12 Mar 2026
THE LOCATION PLAN
12 Mar 2026
EXISTING/PROPOSED BLOCK PLAN
12 Mar 2026
EXISTING
12 Mar 2026
PROPOSED
12 Mar 2026
DELEGATED REPORT
8 May 2026
DN: REFUSE HSE
7 May 2026
SITE NOTICE
24 Mar 2026
Show all 9 rows
APPLICATION FORM - WITHOUT PERSONAL DATA
12 Mar 2026
COMMUNITY INFRASTRUCTURE LEVY - COMPLETED FORM
12 Mar 2026
THE LOCATION PLAN
12 Mar 2026
EXISTING/PROPOSED BLOCK PLAN
12 Mar 2026
EXISTING
12 Mar 2026
PROPOSED
12 Mar 2026

Documents open on the Barnet portal (the portal needs its documents tab opened first — the link handles that). View the application page ↗

Decision

What happened?

Refused on 7 May 2026, delegated decision by Bradley Carson — 8 weeks from submission.

Timeline

Date
Event
12 Mar 2026
Application received
7 May 2026
Delegated decision: Refused · Bradley Carson
12 Mar 2026
Application received
7 May 2026
Delegated decision: Refused · Bradley Carson

Why it was refused

Reason
As stated on the decision notice
1
The proposed development, by reason of the cumulative size, siting, design, bulk and massing of the side and rear extensions, would fail to represent subordinate additions to the host property, appearing as an unduly bulky, overly dominant, prominent and unsympathetic addition that will lead to less than substantial harm to the significance of a designated heritage asset, against which no public benefits such as to outweigh the harm have been identified and which would fail to preserve or enhance the character and appearance of the Watling Estate Conservation Area, contrary to Policies D3 and HC1 of the London Plan (2021), NPPF; Policy CDH01; CDH05 and CDH08 of the LB Barnet Local Plan (2025), the Residential Design Guidance SPD (2016) and the Watling Estate Conservation Area Character Appraisal (2007)
1
The proposed development, by reason of the cumulative size, siting, design, bulk and massing of the side and rear extensions, would fail to represent subordinate additions to the host property, appearing as an unduly bulky, overly dominant, prominent and unsympathetic addition that will lead to less than substantial harm to the significance of a designated heritage asset, against which no public benefits such as to outweigh the harm have been identified and which would fail to preserve or enhance the character and appearance of the Watling Estate Conservation Area, contrary to Policies D3 and HC1 of the London Plan (2021), NPPF; Policy CDH01; CDH05 and CDH08 of the LB Barnet Local Plan (2025), the Residential Design Guidance SPD (2016) and the Watling Estate Conservation Area Character Appraisal (2007)
Policies cited
D3HC1CDH05CDH08NPPF

Public response

Measure
Count
Objections
0
In support
0
Total comments
0
Objections
0
In support
0
Total comments
0
People

Who is involved?

Name
Role
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer — delegated decision
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer — delegated decision
Place

What affects it?

Context around the site — not part of this application. Designations over the site: use the map's designations filter (conservation areas, listed buildings, Article 4, flood risk …). Decisions within 250 metres of the site are listed below — context, not this application.

Other applications within 250 metres (context — nearby, not this application)

No other geocoded decision is recorded within 250 metres.