Planning application · Barnet
26/1198/FUL.
Thurleston 45 Barnet Road Barnet EN5 3HB
Full / Other Planning at Thurleston 45 Barnet Road Barnet EN5 3HB, received 30 Mar 2026 — refused on 18 May 2026 (delegated, Olivia Becci).
ApprovedRefusedOther
At a glance · this applicationBarnet profile →
Refused
Outcome
18 May 2026
7 wks
Decision time
inside the 8-week target
—
Conditions
not captured
16
Documents
16 linked
1
Objections
0 in support
No
Appeal
none recorded
Record from the Barnet planning register as captured; documents link to the council's own files. Nearby applications are context, not part of this application.
Application
What is it?
Demolition of the existing dwelling and erection of a new two storey dwelling with rooms in the roofspace
Reference
26/1198/FUL
Type
Full Application
Applicant
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Postcode
EN5 3HB
Ward
Council
Received
30 Mar 2026
Target date
25 May 2026
Decision date
18 May 2026
Decision route
Delegated (officer)
Status
Refused
Council register
Reference
26/1198/FUL
Type
Full Application
Show all 15 rows
Applicant
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Postcode
EN5 3HB
Ward
Council
Received
30 Mar 2026
Target date
25 May 2026
Decision date
18 May 2026
Decision route
Delegated (officer)
Status
Refused
Council register
Documents
What was filed?
Document
Published
View
Show all 10 rows
Documents open on the Barnet portal (the portal needs its documents tab opened first — the link handles that). View the application page ↗
Decision
What happened?
Refused on 18 May 2026, delegated decision by Olivia Becci — 7 weeks from submission.
Timeline
Date
Event
30 Mar 2026
Application received
25 May 2026
Statutory target date
18 May 2026
Delegated decision: Refused · Olivia Becci
30 Mar 2026
Application received
25 May 2026
Statutory target date
18 May 2026
Delegated decision: Refused · Olivia Becci
Why it was refused
Reason
As stated on the decision notice
1
The proposed development by reason of the scale, bulk, height, massing, siting and
design, would result in an overly dominant and visually obtrusive addition which
would fail to acceptably integrate into the streetscene, to the detriment of the
character and appearance of the site and surrounding area, contrary to Policy D3 of
the London Plan (2021), Policies CDH01 and CDH05 of the Barnet Local Plan
2021- 2036 (adopted March 2025) and the Residential Design Guidance SPD
(2016).
2
The proposed development, by reason of its siting, height and depth, would result in
a harmful loss of outlook, sense of enclosure and increased overbearing impact to
the occupiers of No. 43 (Three Steps) Barnet Road, contrary to policy CDH01 of the
Barnet Local Plan 2021- 2036 (adopted March 2025), the Residential Design
Guidance SPD (2016) and the Sustainable Design and Construction SPD (2016).
1
The proposed development by reason of the scale, bulk, height, massing, siting and
design, would result in an overly dominant and visually obtrusive addition which
would fail to acceptably integrate into the streetscene, to the detriment of the
character and appearance of the site and surrounding area, contrary to Policy D3 of
the London Plan (2021), Policies CDH01 and CDH05 of the Barnet Local Plan
2021- 2036 (adopted March 2025) and the Residential Design Guidance SPD
(2016).
2
The proposed development, by reason of its siting, height and depth, would result in
a harmful loss of outlook, sense of enclosure and increased overbearing impact to
the occupiers of No. 43 (Three Steps) Barnet Road, contrary to policy CDH01 of the
Barnet Local Plan 2021- 2036 (adopted March 2025), the Residential Design
Guidance SPD (2016) and the Sustainable Design and Construction SPD (2016).
Policies cited
D3CDH01CDH05
Public response
Measure
Count
Objections
1
In support
0
Total comments
1
Objections
1
In support
0
Total comments
1
People
Who is involved?
Name
Role
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer — delegated decision
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer — delegated decision
Place
What affects it?
Context around the site — not part of this application. Designations over the site: use the map's designations filter (conservation areas, listed buildings, Article 4, flood risk …). Decisions within 250 metres of the site are listed below — context, not this application.
Other applications within 250 metres (context — nearby, not this application)
No other geocoded decision is recorded within 250 metres.