Planning Atlas
Planning AtlasBarnetChilds Hill wardNW2 2HP384 Finchley Road London NW2 2HPC01394J/03
Planning application · Barnet

C01394J/03.

384 Finchley Road London NW2 2HP

Lawful Development Certificate at 384 Finchley Road London NW2 2HP, received 9 May 2003 — refused on 16 Jun 2003.

BarnetChilds HillNW2 2HPC01394J/03
ApprovedRefusedOther
At a glance · this applicationBarnet profile →
Refused
Outcome
16 Jun 2003
5 wks
Decision time
inside the 8-week target
Conditions
not captured
2
Documents
2 linked
0
Objections
0 in support
No
Appeal
none recorded
Record from the Barnet planning register as captured; documents link to the council's own files. Nearby applications are context, not part of this application.
Application

What is it?

Use as two self-contained flats including internal alterations.

Reference
C01394J/03
Type
Proposed Lawful Development Certificate
Applicant
Agent / consultant
None recorded
Case officer
Not recorded
Postcode
Council
Received
9 May 2003
Target date
4 Jul 2003
Decision date
16 Jun 2003
Decision route
Delegated (officer)
Status
Unlawful
Reference
C01394J/03
Type
Proposed Lawful Development Certificate
Show all 16 rows
Applicant
Agent / consultant
None recorded
Case officer
Not recorded
Postcode
Council
Received
9 May 2003
Target date
4 Jul 2003
Decision date
16 Jun 2003
Decision route
Delegated (officer)
Status
Unlawful
Documents

What was filed?

Document
Published
View
Application Document
14 May 2009
Decision Notice
20 Jun 2006
Application Document
14 May 2009
Decision Notice
20 Jun 2006

Documents open on the Barnet portal (the portal needs its documents tab opened first — the link handles that). View the application page ↗

Decision

What happened?

Refused on 16 Jun 2003 — 5 weeks from submission.

Timeline

Date
Event
9 May 2003
Application received
4 Jul 2003
Statutory target date
16 Jun 2003
Delegated decision: Refused
9 May 2003
Application received
4 Jul 2003
Statutory target date
16 Jun 2003
Delegated decision: Refused

Public response

Measure
Count
Objections
0
In support
0
Total comments
0
Objections
0
In support
0
Total comments
0
People

Who is involved?

Name
Role
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
No agent recorded
Applied without an agent, or agent not recorded.
Case officer not recorded
No case officer is recorded.
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
No agent recorded
Applied without an agent, or agent not recorded.
Case officer not recorded
No case officer is recorded.
Place

What affects it?

Context around the site — not part of this application. Designations over the site: use the map's designations filter (conservation areas, listed buildings, Article 4, flood risk …). Decisions within 250 metres of the site are listed below — context, not this application.

Other applications within 250 metres (context — nearby, not this application)

No other geocoded decision is recorded within 250 metres.