Planning Atlas
Planning Atlas›Barnet›…Garden Suburb wardN2 0AJ›C16420D/06
Planning application · Barnet

C16420D/06.

Grass Verge At North West Junction Of Lyttleton Road (A1) And The Bishops Avenue London N2 0AJ

Full / Other Planning at Grass Verge At North West Junction Of Lyttleton Road (A1) And The Bishops Avenue London N2 0AJ, received 29 Nov 2006 — refused on 5 Jan 2007 (delegated, Fabien Peterson).

Barnet›Garden Suburb›N2 0AJ›C16420D/06
ApprovedRefusedOther
At a glance · this applicationBarnet profile →
Refused
Outcome
5 Jan 2007
5 wks
Decision time
inside the 8-week target
—
Conditions
not captured
0
Documents
on the council file
0
Objections
0 in support
No
Appeal
none recorded
Record from the Barnet planning register as captured; documents link to the council's own files. Nearby applications are context, not part of this application.
Application

What is it?

Installation of an 8m high telegraph style mobile telecommunications pole, with one antenna. Associated equipment cabinet.

Reference
C16420D/06
Type
Full Application
Site
Applicant
Agent / consultant
None recorded
Case officer
Postcode
Ward
Council
Received
29 Nov 2006
Target date
24 Jan 2007
Decision date
5 Jan 2007
Decision route
Delegated (officer)
Status
Refused
Council register
Reference
C16420D/06
Type
Full Application
Site
Show all 15 rows
Applicant
Agent / consultant
None recorded
Case officer
Postcode
Ward
Council
Received
29 Nov 2006
Target date
24 Jan 2007
Decision date
5 Jan 2007
Decision route
Delegated (officer)
Status
Refused
Council register
Documents

What was filed?

No documents are recorded for this application.

Documents open on the Barnet portal (the portal needs its documents tab opened first — the link handles that). View the application page ↗

Decision

What happened?

Refused on 5 Jan 2007, delegated decision by Fabien Peterson — 5 weeks from submission.

Timeline

Date
Event
29 Nov 2006
Application received
24 Jan 2007
Statutory target date
5 Jan 2007
Delegated decision: Refused · Fabien Peterson
29 Nov 2006
Application received
24 Jan 2007
Statutory target date
5 Jan 2007
Delegated decision: Refused · Fabien Peterson

Public response

Measure
Count
Objections
0
In support
0
Total comments
0
Objections
0
In support
0
Total comments
0
People

Who is involved?

Name
Role
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
No agent recorded
Applied without an agent, or agent not recorded.
Case officer — delegated decision
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
No agent recorded
Applied without an agent, or agent not recorded.
Case officer — delegated decision
Place

What affects it?

Context around the site — not part of this application. Designations over the site: use the map's designations filter (conservation areas, listed buildings, Article 4, flood risk …). Decisions within 250 metres of the site are listed below — context, not this application.

Other applications within 250 metres (context — nearby, not this application)

No other geocoded decision is recorded within 250 metres.