Planning Atlas
Planning AtlasBarnetUnderhill wardEN5 3BPN15827/07
Planning application · Barnet

N15827/07.

26-32 Ryecroft Crescent Barnet Hertfordshire EN5 3BP

Full / Other Planning at 26-32 Ryecroft Crescent Barnet Hertfordshire EN5 3BP, received 23 Oct 2007 — approved on 19 Dec 2007 (delegated, Josleen Chug).

BarnetUnderhillEN5 3BPN15827/07
ApprovedRefusedOther
At a glance · this applicationBarnet profile →
Approved
Outcome
19 Dec 2007
8 wks
Decision time
inside the 8-week target
Conditions
not captured
3
Documents
3 linked
0
Objections
0 in support
No
Appeal
none recorded
Record from the Barnet planning register as captured; documents link to the council's own files. Nearby applications are context, not part of this application.
Application

What is it?

Replacement of windows.

Reference
N15827/07
Type
Full Application
Agent / consultant
None recorded
Case officer
Postcode
Council
Received
23 Oct 2007
Target date
18 Dec 2007
Decision date
19 Dec 2007
Decision route
Delegated (officer)
Status
Approved subject to conditions
Reference
N15827/07
Type
Full Application
Show all 15 rows
Agent / consultant
None recorded
Case officer
Postcode
Council
Received
23 Oct 2007
Target date
18 Dec 2007
Decision date
19 Dec 2007
Decision route
Delegated (officer)
Status
Approved subject to conditions
Documents

What was filed?

Document
Published
View
Committee / Officer Report
8 Jan 2008
Decision Notice
8 Jan 2008
Application Documents
5 Nov 2007
Committee / Officer Report
8 Jan 2008
Decision Notice
8 Jan 2008
Application Documents
5 Nov 2007

Documents open on the Barnet portal (the portal needs its documents tab opened first — the link handles that). View the application page ↗

Decision

What happened?

Approved on 19 Dec 2007, delegated decision by Josleen Chug — 8 weeks from submission.

Timeline

Date
Event
23 Oct 2007
Application received
18 Dec 2007
Statutory target date
19 Dec 2007
Delegated decision: Approved · Josleen Chug
23 Oct 2007
Application received
18 Dec 2007
Statutory target date
19 Dec 2007
Delegated decision: Approved · Josleen Chug

Public response

Measure
Count
Objections
0
In support
0
Total comments
0
Objections
0
In support
0
Total comments
0
People

Who is involved?

Name
Role
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
No agent recorded
Applied without an agent, or agent not recorded.
Case officer — delegated decision
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
No agent recorded
Applied without an agent, or agent not recorded.
Case officer — delegated decision
Place

What affects it?

Context around the site — not part of this application. Designations over the site: use the map's designations filter (conservation areas, listed buildings, Article 4, flood risk …). Decisions within 250 metres of the site are listed below — context, not this application.

Other applications within 250 metres (context — nearby, not this application)

No other geocoded decision is recorded within 250 metres.