Planning Atlas
Planning AtlasCamdenHaverstock (Pre May 2022) ward2005/2091/P
Planning application · Camden

2005/2091/P.

The Hill P.H. 94 Haverstock Hill London NW3 2BD

Full / Other Planning at The Hill P.H. 94 Haverstock Hill London NW3 2BD, received 2 Dec 2005 — approved (delegated, Hugh Miller 2624).

CamdenHaverstock (Pre May 2022)NW3 2BD2005/2091/P
ApprovedRefusedOther
At a glance · this applicationCamden profile →
Approved
Outcome
no decision date
Decision time
submission → decision
Conditions
not captured
4
Documents
4 linked
Objections
not captured
No
Appeal
none recorded
Record from the Camden planning register as captured; documents link to the council's own files. Nearby applications are context, not part of this application.
Application

What is it?

Retrospective application carryout modifications to currently unauthorised extract flue with brickwork effect enclosure, increase the height of the front boundary wall facing Haverstock Hill by 310mm, retention of timber chiller enclosure, timber fence and steel railings, safety railings within the public house garden (class A4).

Reference
2005/2091/P
Type
Full Planning Permission
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Postcode
NW3 2BD
Council
Received
2 Dec 2005
Decision date
Decision route
Delegated (officer)
Status
FINAL DECISION
Reference
2005/2091/P
Type
Full Planning Permission
Show all 14 rows
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Postcode
NW3 2BD
Council
Received
2 Dec 2005
Decision date
Decision route
Delegated (officer)
Status
FINAL DECISION
Documents

What was filed?

Document
Published
View
Drawing
16 Jul 2014
OS Extract
16 Jul 2014
Application Form
16 Jul 2014
FULL PLANNING PERMISSION GRANTED - 20/01/2006
16 Jul 2014
Drawing
16 Jul 2014
OS Extract
16 Jul 2014
Application Form
16 Jul 2014
Show all 4 rows
FULL PLANNING PERMISSION GRANTED - 20/01/2006
16 Jul 2014

Documents open on the Camden portal. View the application page ↗

Decision

What happened?

Approved, delegated decision by Hugh Miller 2624.

Timeline

Date
Event
2 Dec 2005
Application received
2 Dec 2005
Application received

Public response

Comment counts were not captured for this application.

People

Who is involved?

Name
Role
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer — delegated decision
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer — delegated decision
Place

What affects it?

Context around the site — not part of this application. Designations over the site: use the map's designations filter (conservation areas, listed buildings, Article 4, flood risk …). Decisions within 250 metres of the site are listed below — context, not this application.

Other applications within 250 metres (context — nearby, not this application)

No other geocoded decision is recorded within 250 metres.