Planning Atlas
Planning AtlasCamdenWest Hampstead ward2026/1855/P
Planning application · Camden

2026/1855/P.

Footpath o/s 225 West End Lane London NW6 1XJ

Full / Other Planning at Footpath o/s 225 West End Lane London NW6 1XJ, received 11 May 2026 — registered.

CamdenWest HampsteadNW6 1XJ2026/1855/P
ApprovedRefusedOther
At a glance · this applicationCamden profile →
REGISTERED
Outcome
no decision date
Decision time
submission → decision
Conditions
not captured
15
Documents
15 linked
Objections
not captured
No
Appeal
none recorded
Record from the Camden planning register as captured; documents link to the council's own files. Nearby applications are context, not part of this application.
Application

What is it?

Installation of 1No. BT Street Hub Unit and associated advertisement panels on either side of the unit

Reference
2026/1855/P
Type
Full Planning Permission
Applicant
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Postcode
NW6 1XJ
Council
Received
11 May 2026
Target date
21 Jun 2026
Decision date
Decision route
Not recorded
Status
REGISTERED
Reference
2026/1855/P
Type
Full Planning Permission
Show all 14 rows
Applicant
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Postcode
NW6 1XJ
Council
Received
11 May 2026
Target date
21 Jun 2026
Decision date
Decision route
Not recorded
Status
REGISTERED
Documents

What was filed?

Document
Published
View
Document
Document
Document
Document
Document
Document
Document
Document
Document
Document
Document
Document
Document
Show all 10 rows
Document
Document
Document
Document
Document
Document
Document
Decision

What happened?

Status: REGISTERED. No decision is recorded yet.

Timeline

Date
Event
11 May 2026
Application received
21 Jun 2026
Statutory target date
11 May 2026
Application received
21 Jun 2026
Statutory target date

Why it was refused

Reason
As stated on the decision notice
1
The proposed Street Hub, by reason of its location, size and detailed design, would add harmful visual clutter and detract from the character and appearance of the street scene and the West End Green Conservation Area and the setting of the neighbouring grade II listed building and Camden Town conservation area, contrary to policies D1 (Design), and D2 (Heritage) of the Camden Local Plan 2017 and policy 2 and 3 of the Fortune Green and West Hampstead Neighbourhood Plan (2015)
2
The proposed Street Hub, by virtue of its location, size and detailed design, and adding unnecessary street clutter, would reduce the amount of useable, unobstructed footway, which would be detrimental to the quality of the public realm, cause harm to highway safety and hinder pedestrian movement and have a detrimental impact on the promotion of walking as an alternative to motorised transport, thereby failing to improve the pedestrian environment contrary to policies G1 (Delivery and location of growth), A1 (Managing the impact of development), C6 (Access for all) and T1 (Prioritising walking, cycling and public transport) of the Camden Local Plan 2017 and policies 7 and 9 of the Fortune Green and West Hampstead Neighbourhood Plan (2015).
3
The proposed Street Hub, by virtue of its inappropriate siting, size and design, would fail to reduce opportunities for crime and antisocial behaviour to the detriment of community safety and security, and compromise the safety of those using and servicing the hub, contrary to policy C5 (Safety and Security) of the Camden Local Plan 2017. In the absence of a legal agreement to secure a maintenance plan for the proposed Street Hub, the proposal would be detrimental to the quality of the public realm, and detract from the character and appearance of the streetscene and West End Green Conservation Area, contrary to policies D1 (Design), D2 (Heritage), G1 (Delivery and location of growth), A1 (Managing the impact of development), C6 (Access for all) and T1 (Prioritising walking, cycling and public transport) of the London Borough of Camden Local Plan 2017, and policy 2 Fortune Green and West Hampstead Neighbourhood Plan (2015).
4
In the absence of a legal agreement to secure a maintenance plan for the proposed Street Hub, the proposal would be detrimental to the quality of the public realm, and detract from the character and appearance of the streetscene and West End Green Conservation Area, contrary to policies D1 (Design), D2 (Heritage), G1 (Delivery and location of growth), A1 (Managing the impact of development), C6 (Access for all) and T1 (Prioritising walking, cycling and public transport) of the London Borough of Camden Local Plan 2017, and policy 2 Fortune Green and West Hampstead Neighbourhood Plan (2015).
1
The proposed Street Hub, by reason of its location, size and detailed design, would add harmful visual clutter and detract from the character and appearance of the street scene and the West End Green Conservation Area and the setting of the neighbouring grade II listed building and Camden Town conservation area, contrary to policies D1 (Design), and D2 (Heritage) of the Camden Local Plan 2017 and policy 2 and 3 of the Fortune Green and West Hampstead Neighbourhood Plan (2015)
2
The proposed Street Hub, by virtue of its location, size and detailed design, and adding unnecessary street clutter, would reduce the amount of useable, unobstructed footway, which would be detrimental to the quality of the public realm, cause harm to highway safety and hinder pedestrian movement and have a detrimental impact on the promotion of walking as an alternative to motorised transport, thereby failing to improve the pedestrian environment contrary to policies G1 (Delivery and location of growth), A1 (Managing the impact of development), C6 (Access for all) and T1 (Prioritising walking, cycling and public transport) of the Camden Local Plan 2017 and policies 7 and 9 of the Fortune Green and West Hampstead Neighbourhood Plan (2015).
3
The proposed Street Hub, by virtue of its inappropriate siting, size and design, would fail to reduce opportunities for crime and antisocial behaviour to the detriment of community safety and security, and compromise the safety of those using and servicing the hub, contrary to policy C5 (Safety and Security) of the Camden Local Plan 2017. In the absence of a legal agreement to secure a maintenance plan for the proposed Street Hub, the proposal would be detrimental to the quality of the public realm, and detract from the character and appearance of the streetscene and West End Green Conservation Area, contrary to policies D1 (Design), D2 (Heritage), G1 (Delivery and location of growth), A1 (Managing the impact of development), C6 (Access for all) and T1 (Prioritising walking, cycling and public transport) of the London Borough of Camden Local Plan 2017, and policy 2 Fortune Green and West Hampstead Neighbourhood Plan (2015).
Show all 4 rows
4
In the absence of a legal agreement to secure a maintenance plan for the proposed Street Hub, the proposal would be detrimental to the quality of the public realm, and detract from the character and appearance of the streetscene and West End Green Conservation Area, contrary to policies D1 (Design), D2 (Heritage), G1 (Delivery and location of growth), A1 (Managing the impact of development), C6 (Access for all) and T1 (Prioritising walking, cycling and public transport) of the London Borough of Camden Local Plan 2017, and policy 2 Fortune Green and West Hampstead Neighbourhood Plan (2015).
Policies cited
Fortune Green and West Hampstead Neighbourhood Plan 2Fortune Green and West Hampstead Neighbourhood Plan 3Fortune Green and West Hampstead Neighbourhood Plan 7Fortune Green and West Hampstead Neighbourhood Plan 9

Public response

Comment counts were not captured for this application.

People

Who is involved?

Name
Role
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer — delegated decision
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer — delegated decision
Place

What affects it?

Context around the site — not part of this application. Designations over the site: use the map's designations filter (conservation areas, listed buildings, Article 4, flood risk …). Decisions within 250 metres of the site are listed below — context, not this application.

Other applications within 250 metres (context — nearby, not this application)

No other geocoded decision is recorded within 250 metres.