Planning Atlas
Planning Atlas›Camden›…Regents Park (NE area) (pre 2002) wardNW1 0AA›PEX0200143
Planning application · Camden

PEX0200143.

53 BAYHAM STREET LONDON NW1 0AA

Full / Other Planning at 53 BAYHAM STREET LONDON NW1 0AA, received 26 Jul 2002 — refused (delegated, Neil McDonald 2061).

ApprovedRefusedOther
At a glance · this applicationCamden profile →
Refused
Outcome
no decision date
—
Decision time
submission → decision
—
Conditions
not captured
0
Documents
on the council file
—
Objections
not captured
Yes
Appeal
Allowed 17-03-2003
Record from the Camden planning register as captured; documents link to the council's own files. Nearby applications are context, not part of this application.
Application

What is it?

The construction of a mansard roof extension for a 1-bedroom flat, alterations to the existing elevations and the conversion of the second floor from office (B1) to 2 x 1 bed flats, as shown by drawing numbers SE1/SC/R/01B, 02, 03, 04A, 05, 06, 07B, 08B, 09B, 10B, 11A, 12D, 13, 14 and location plan.

Reference
PEX0200143
Type
Full Planning Permission
Site
Applicant
Agent / consultant
None recorded
Case officer
Postcode
Ward
Council
Received
26 Jul 2002
Decision date
—
Decision route
Delegated (officer)
Status
APPEAL DECIDED
Council register
Reference
PEX0200143
Type
Full Planning Permission
Site
Show all 14 rows
Applicant
Agent / consultant
None recorded
Case officer
Postcode
Ward
Council
Received
26 Jul 2002
Decision date
—
Decision route
Delegated (officer)
Status
APPEAL DECIDED
Council register
Documents

What was filed?

No documents are recorded for this application.

Documents open on the Camden portal. View the application page ↗

Decision

What happened?

Refused, delegated decision by Neil McDonald 2061.

Timeline

Date
Event
26 Jul 2002
Application received
Appeal
Yes · Allowed 17-03-2003
26 Jul 2002
Application received
Appeal
Yes · Allowed 17-03-2003

Appeal

Appeal
Outcome
Yes
Outcome: Allowed 17-03-2003
Yes
Outcome: Allowed 17-03-2003

Public response

Comment counts were not captured for this application.

People

Who is involved?

Name
Role
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
No agent recorded
Applied without an agent, or agent not recorded.
Case officer — delegated decision
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
No agent recorded
Applied without an agent, or agent not recorded.
Case officer — delegated decision
Place

What affects it?

Context around the site — not part of this application. Designations over the site: use the map's designations filter (conservation areas, listed buildings, Article 4, flood risk …). Decisions within 250 metres of the site are listed below — context, not this application.

Other applications within 250 metres (context — nearby, not this application)

No other geocoded decision is recorded within 250 metres.