Planning Atlas
AtlasCamdenOfficersMark Hunter
Case officer · Camden Planning

Mark Hunter.

Last recorded decision Jul 1998 — no decisions in this record since

A case officer at Camden with an approval rate of 64% across 16 decided planning applications, spanning 11 wards.[1] Decision speed and appeal performance publish when decision notices are ingested.

Planning officer16 decisions64% approval
Wards shaded by approval rate · click one to open it
Showing
All years · subscriber →across all years on record — a period re-scopes the headline figures and the trend
At a glanceEach metric links to the investigation behind it
All investigations →
16
Applications
1998
Approval rate over time — tougher or softer 🔒Dashed line = London average

Not enough dated decisions for a trend yet.

What they decide — by application type
How they compareVersus peers
Approval rate64% · 409th of 429
higher is betterdashed = London avg
Decision time · publishes with decision notices
in development
Appeal overturn · publishes with decision notices
in development
How this officer decides — from their own reports

Not filled in yet — this needs at least 20 of Mark Hunter's own officer reports parsed, and their reports haven't reached that threshold in the parsing run. It fills automatically as parsing progresses; nothing is estimated in its place.

Policy playbook — what this officer cites[3]

The policies this officer cites most across their decisions — how often each appears, and whether refusals citing it survive appeal.

In development — policy citations are coded from officer reports, and that parsing hasn't run for Camden yet. Nothing is shown until it is real.

Recent applications
Address
Reference
Type
Outcome
Date
PE9800315R1
Full Planning Permission
Approved
1998-07-21
PE9800528
Full Planning Permission
Approved
1998-07-21
PE9800315R1
Full Planning Permission
Approved
1998-07-21
PE9800528
Full Planning Permission
Approved
1998-07-21
Full application history locked
Subscribe to see all 16 decisions →
Consultants approved most— subscriber data
1. Allies & Morrison
2. Quinlan Thomas Design,
3. Yurky Cross Chartered Architects,
4. Northern Building Design Associates,
At a glance
OfficerMark Hunter
BoroughCamden
RolePlanning officer
Experience
Applications16 (1998)
Approval rate64%
London approval avg79%
Who decides here
GovernmentMayor of LondonCouncilCommitteeOfficersDecisionsApplicantsInspectorate
Related investigations
When committees overrule officers like this one →
How often members depart from officer recommendations, and how those overrides fare at appeal.
How much gets decided without a committee →
The delegated share by borough and officer — where the real power over decisions sits.
Sources & method
  1. [1]Applications decided, approval rate, per-year trend and ward breakdown — London Borough of Camden planning register and published decision notices, 1998. · methodology
  2. [2]Appeal overturn and decision-time benchmarks — Planning Inspectorate (PINS) appeal decisions and application date pairs; not yet computed per officer, shown as a dash until they are. · PINS appeals casework
  3. [3]Condition load — mean effective conditions attached to Camden decision notices (grant/split), parsed from the published notice text; a borough figure, not yet split per case officer.
  4. [4]Policy citations will be coded from officer reports against the adopted Local Plan, London Plan and NPPF — that parsing has not run for this borough yet.
Methodology is published in full so every number is traceable to its primary source.