What development costs here.
City Of London has no borough CIL rate on record (Mayoral CIL only); a consent here carries 7.1 conditions on average and takes 14 weeks to decide (2nd slowest of 32). We hold 174 of its s106 agreements and 78 viability assessments — the deeds and the numbers, not a rate table.
- CIL: highest Kensington And Chelsea £1,132/m², lowest Bexley £91/m².
- Conditions: heaviest Hillingdon 7.9, lightest Westminster 3.3 per consent · City Of London 7.1.
- Decision time: slowest Camden 15 wks, fastest Barking And Dagenham 8 wks · City Of London 14 wks.
- s106 per agreement (deeds read so far, ≥10 per borough): highest Croydon £700k median, lowest Kingston Upon Thames £950 · City Of London £600k (36 read).
The borough's charging schedule by zone and use, indexed where the council publishes an indexed figure, plus Mayoral CIL. Source: the council's CIL page.
Average conditions attached to a consent, from the decision notices we have read (88 in City Of London), and how long each type takes from receipt to decision.
Most common conditions: other (104) · time limit (83) · approved drawings (82) · materials (76) · energy sustainability (59) · construction management (51).
36 of the 174 agreements on file carry a pound total we have read: median £600k, mean £2.1m, largest £31m, £77m in total. Small undertakings dominate the median; the extraction is still running, so treat these as from the deeds read, not the borough total.
Scheme size is the unit count parsed from the proposal; agreements without one are left out here.
Every obligation in the City Of London agreements we have read, grouped by what it is for — the money by type where a sum is stated, and how often each type appears at all (most obligations are unpriced: build this, provide that).
- Construction management£133m16 deeds
- Other£45m40 deeds
- Employment & training£19m18 deeds
- Affordable housing£7.4m28 deeds
- Public realm£2.3m5 deeds
- Highways & road safety£650k20 deeds
- Education£600k10 deeds
- Monitoring & legal fees£418k17 deeds
| Other | 63% · London 40% | most: Brent 77% | |
| Affordable housing | 44% · London 29% | most: Southwark 69% | |
| Highways & road safety | 31% · London 28% | most: Tower 62% | |
| Employment & training | 28% · London 14% | most: Greenwich 39% | |
| Monitoring & legal fees | 27% · London 47% | most: Merton 82% | |
| Construction management | 25% · London 21% | most: Barnet 61% | |
| Travel plan | 20% · London 12% | most: Greenwich 39% | |
| Community facilities | 19% · London 9% | most: Brent 38% | |
| Cycle provision | 19% · London 17% | most: Barnet 58% | |
| Open space & play | 19% · London 16% | most: Brent 46% |
Red tick = London share across every deed read (2,311).
- Other · in 23 of 64 deeds · typically £0“local procurement target”
- Affordable housing · in 22 of 64 deeds · typically £500k“Off-site provision of Affordable Housing contribution”
- Highways & road safety · in 12 of 64 deeds · typically £50k“Evaluation and Design Fee Payment for Section 278 Works”
- Monitoring & legal fees · in 9 of 64 deeds · typically £31k“First Annual Construction Monitoring Contribution”
- Community facilities · in 5 of 64 deeds · typically £50k“£50,000 for community centre”
- Construction management · in 4 of 64 deeds · typically £39k“Total projected construction procurement spend”
- Carbon offset & energy · in 4 of 64 deeds · typically £43k“Carbon Off-set Contribution to City of London Carbon Off-set Scheme, recalculated at completion”
- Education · in 4 of 64 deeds · typically £150k“Contribute £150,000 to local schools”
- Other · in 20 of 64 deeds (31%)“Charity events and volunteering”
- Employment & training · in 17 of 64 deeds (27%)“local labour and job starts”
- Travel plan · in 13 of 64 deeds (20%)“Travel Plan submission and approval including Accessible Car Parking Spaces Management Plan”
- Construction management · in 12 of 64 deeds (19%)“Delivery and Servicing Management Plan submission and compliance”
- Cycle provision · in 10 of 64 deeds (16%)“Bike Stores”
- Open space & play · in 10 of 64 deeds (16%)“Open Space Play”
- Highways & road safety · in 9 of 64 deeds (14%)“Public Realm Paving”
- Monitoring & legal fees · in 8 of 64 deeds (13%)“First Interference Survey for television reception baseline recording around 61-65 Holborn Viaduct development”
These carry no sum in the deed but cost time, design and management to deliver — the hidden cost of consent here.
Approved schemes since 2015 with a unit count in the proposal; “with s106” means we hold the agreement — a floor, not the council's full count. Smallest scheme here with an agreement on file: 87 units.
Share of approved 10+ unit schemes with an agreement on file (boroughs with 100+ deeds held) — highest Croydon 83%, lowest Kingston Upon Thames 30%. On small schemes (1–9 units) agreements are rare everywhere except where a small-sites tariff applies: Lambeth 56%, Hackney 54%, Kensington And Chelsea 48%, Camden 44%.
Policy thresholds differ too — most boroughs seek affordable housing from 10 units (national threshold), some (Islington) charge a small-sites contribution from the first unit; the deed rate above is what actually happens, not what the policy says.
Every s106 agreement we hold for City Of London, newest first, linked to its application (the document itself is on the application page). “Unread” = on file, terms not yet extracted.
Show all 40 rows
Showing the newest 40 of 174 · use Search for the rest.