Planning Atlas
Planning Atlas›Enfield›…Enfield Highway ward›17/03792/HOU
Planning application · Enfield

17/03792/HOU.

42 Goldsdown Close Enfield EN3 7RR

Householder at 42 Goldsdown Close Enfield EN3 7RR, received 23 Aug 2017 — withdrawn on 22 May 2018 (delegated, Tanya Uppal).

Enfield›Enfield Highway›EN3 7RR›17/03792/HOU
ApprovedRefusedOther
At a glance · this applicationEnfield profile →
Withdrawn
Outcome
22 May 2018
39 wks
Decision time
31 wks over the 8-week target
—
Conditions
not captured
0
Documents
on the council file
0
Objections
0 in support
No
Appeal
none recorded
Record from the Enfield planning register as captured; documents link to the council's own files. Nearby applications are context, not part of this application.
Application

What is it?

Single storey rear extension.

Reference
17/03792/HOU
Type
Householder
Site
Applicant
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Postcode
EN3 7RR
Ward
Council
Received
23 Aug 2017
Validated
18 Oct 2017
Target date
13 Dec 2017
Decision date
22 May 2018
Decision route
Delegated (officer)
Status
Application Withdrawn
Council register
Reference
17/03792/HOU
Type
Householder
Site
Show all 16 rows
Applicant
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Postcode
EN3 7RR
Ward
Council
Received
23 Aug 2017
Validated
18 Oct 2017
Target date
13 Dec 2017
Decision date
22 May 2018
Decision route
Delegated (officer)
Status
Application Withdrawn
Council register
Documents

What was filed?

No documents are recorded for this application.

Documents open on the Enfield portal (the portal needs its documents tab opened first — the link handles that). View the application page ↗

Decision

What happened?

Withdrawn on 22 May 2018, delegated decision by Tanya Uppal — 39 weeks from submission (31 over the 8-week target).

Timeline

Date
Event
23 Aug 2017
Application received
18 Oct 2017
Application validated
13 Dec 2017
Statutory target date
22 May 2018
Delegated decision: Withdrawn · Tanya Uppal
23 Aug 2017
Application received
18 Oct 2017
Application validated
13 Dec 2017
Statutory target date
Show all 4 rows
22 May 2018
Delegated decision: Withdrawn · Tanya Uppal

Public response

Measure
Count
Objections
0
In support
0
Total comments
0
Objections
0
In support
0
Total comments
0
People

Who is involved?

Name
Role
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer — delegated decision
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer — delegated decision
Place

What affects it?

Context around the site — not part of this application. Designations over the site: use the map's designations filter (conservation areas, listed buildings, Article 4, flood risk …). Decisions within 250 metres of the site are listed below — context, not this application.

Other applications within 250 metres (context — nearby, not this application)

No other geocoded decision is recorded within 250 metres.