Planning Atlas
Planning AtlasEnfieldChase ward18/00198/HOU
Planning application · Enfield

18/00198/HOU.

261 The Ridgeway Enfield EN2 8AL

Householder at 261 The Ridgeway Enfield EN2 8AL, received 16 Jan 2018 — approved on 19 Mar 2018 (delegated, Tanya Uppal).

EnfieldChaseEN2 8AL18/00198/HOU
ApprovedRefusedOther
At a glance · this applicationEnfield profile →
Approved
Outcome
19 Mar 2018
9 wks
Decision time
1 wks over the 8-week target
Conditions
not captured
0
Documents
on the council file
0
Objections
0 in support
No
Appeal
none recorded
Record from the Enfield planning register as captured; documents link to the council's own files. Nearby applications are context, not part of this application.
Application

What is it?

The council record carries no proposal text.

Reference
18/00198/HOU
Type
Householder
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Postcode
EN2 8AL
Ward
Council
Received
16 Jan 2018
Validated
22 Jan 2018
Target date
19 Mar 2018
Decision date
19 Mar 2018
Decision route
Delegated (officer)
Status
Decided
Reference
18/00198/HOU
Type
Householder
Show all 16 rows
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Postcode
EN2 8AL
Ward
Council
Received
16 Jan 2018
Validated
22 Jan 2018
Target date
19 Mar 2018
Decision date
19 Mar 2018
Decision route
Delegated (officer)
Status
Decided
Documents

What was filed?

No documents are recorded for this application.

Documents open on the Enfield portal (the portal needs its documents tab opened first — the link handles that). View the application page ↗

Decision

What happened?

Approved on 19 Mar 2018, delegated decision by Tanya Uppal — 9 weeks from submission (1 over the 8-week target).

Timeline

Date
Event
16 Jan 2018
Application received
22 Jan 2018
Application validated
19 Mar 2018
Statutory target date
19 Mar 2018
Delegated decision: Approved · Tanya Uppal
16 Jan 2018
Application received
22 Jan 2018
Application validated
19 Mar 2018
Statutory target date
Show all 4 rows
19 Mar 2018
Delegated decision: Approved · Tanya Uppal

Public response

Measure
Count
Objections
0
In support
0
Total comments
0
Objections
0
In support
0
Total comments
0
People

Who is involved?

Name
Role
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer — delegated decision
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer — delegated decision
Place

What affects it?

Context around the site — not part of this application. Designations over the site: use the map's designations filter (conservation areas, listed buildings, Article 4, flood risk …). Decisions within 250 metres of the site are listed below — context, not this application.

Other applications within 250 metres (context — nearby, not this application)

No other geocoded decision is recorded within 250 metres.