Planning Atlas
Planning Atlas›Enfield›…Southbury ward›20/00788/OUT
Planning application · Enfield

20/00788/OUT.

Colosseum Retail Park Dearsley Road Enfield EN1 3FD

Full / Other Planning at Colosseum Retail Park Dearsley Road Enfield EN1 3FD, received 4 Mar 2020 — approved on 30 Jul 2021 by committee.

Enfield›Southbury›EN1 3FD›20/00788/OUT
ApprovedRefusedOther
At a glance · this applicationEnfield profile →
Approved
Outcome
30 Jul 2021
73 wks
Decision time
65 wks over the 8-week target
—
Conditions
not captured
458
Documents
200 linked
0
Objections
0 in support
No
Appeal
none recorded
Record from the Enfield planning register as captured; documents link to the council's own files. Nearby applications are context, not part of this application.
Application

What is it?

HYBRID PLANNING APPLICATION for the phased demolition of all existing buildings and structures, site preparation works and the comprehensive residential-led mixed use redevelopment of Colosseum Retail Park comprising: DETAILED planning application for the construction of four buildings comprising residential dwellings (Use Class C3), flexible commercial floorspace including a Work Hub (Use Classes A1, A2, A3, A4, B1, D1 and/or D2), ancillary car/cycle parking, amenity, plant, all other associated public, communal and private realm, soft/hard landscaping, infrastructure, access and highway works, and any temporary landscaping, parking and access arrangements; OUTLINE planning application (wit

Reference
20/00788/OUT
Type
Outline
Site
Applicant
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Postcode
EN1 3FD
Ward
Council
Received
4 Mar 2020
Validated
18 Mar 2020
Target date
8 Jul 2020
Decision date
30 Jul 2021
Decision route
Planning committee
Status
Decided
Council register
Reference
20/00788/OUT
Type
Outline
Site
Show all 16 rows
Applicant
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Postcode
EN1 3FD
Ward
Council
Received
4 Mar 2020
Validated
18 Mar 2020
Target date
8 Jul 2020
Decision date
30 Jul 2021
Decision route
Planning committee
Status
Decided
Council register
Documents

What was filed?

Document
Published
View
LBE-SV-PRN-002_PR-ECCBL-2YM07954-iRADV C5840_0761_001
1 Sept 2021
LBE-SV-PRN-002_PR-ECCBL-2YM07954-iRADV C5840_0762_001
1 Sept 2021
LBE-SV-PRN-002_PR-ECCBL-2YM07954-iRADV C5840_0763_001
1 Sept 2021
LBE-SV-PRN-002_PR-ECCBL-2YM07954-iRADV C5840_0764_001
1 Sept 2021
LBE-SV-PRN-002_PR-ECCBL-2YM07954-iRADV C5840_0765_001
1 Sept 2021
Decision Notice
30 Jul 2021
20.09.08 - CRP ES Review - Response to Turley_Final for Subm
29 Sept 2020
CRP Breakeven Financial Appraisal 17.09.2020
29 Sept 2020
DRE - Colosseum Retail Park - Viability Review Report Update
29 Sept 2020
DRE - CRP - REview of Viability Update - September 2020
29 Sept 2020
LBE-SV-PRN-002_PR-ECCBL-2YM07954-iRADV C5840_0761_001
1 Sept 2021
LBE-SV-PRN-002_PR-ECCBL-2YM07954-iRADV C5840_0762_001
1 Sept 2021
LBE-SV-PRN-002_PR-ECCBL-2YM07954-iRADV C5840_0763_001
1 Sept 2021
Show all 10 rows
LBE-SV-PRN-002_PR-ECCBL-2YM07954-iRADV C5840_0764_001
1 Sept 2021
LBE-SV-PRN-002_PR-ECCBL-2YM07954-iRADV C5840_0765_001
1 Sept 2021
Decision Notice
30 Jul 2021
20.09.08 - CRP ES Review - Response to Turley_Final for Subm
29 Sept 2020
CRP Breakeven Financial Appraisal 17.09.2020
29 Sept 2020
DRE - Colosseum Retail Park - Viability Review Report Update
29 Sept 2020
DRE - CRP - REview of Viability Update - September 2020
29 Sept 2020

458 documents on the council file; the first 200 are listed here.

Documents open on the Enfield portal (the portal needs its documents tab opened first — the link handles that). View the application page ↗

Decision

What happened?

Approved on 30 Jul 2021, determined by the planning committee — 73 weeks from submission (65 over the 8-week target).

Timeline

Date
Event
4 Mar 2020
Application received
18 Mar 2020
Application validated
8 Jul 2020
Statutory target date
30 Jul 2021
Committee decision: Approved
4 Mar 2020
Application received
18 Mar 2020
Application validated
8 Jul 2020
Statutory target date
Show all 4 rows
30 Jul 2021
Committee decision: Approved

Public response

Measure
Count
Objections
0
In support
0
Total comments
0
Objections
0
In support
0
Total comments
0
People

Who is involved?

Name
Role
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer (report to committee)
Determined at committee
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer (report to committee)
Show all 4 rows
Determined at committee
Place

What affects it?

Context around the site — not part of this application. Designations over the site: use the map's designations filter (conservation areas, listed buildings, Article 4, flood risk …). Decisions within 250 metres of the site are listed below — context, not this application.

Other applications within 250 metres (context — nearby, not this application)

No other geocoded decision is recorded within 250 metres.