Planning Atlas
Planning AtlasEnfieldChase ward20/01685/FUL
Planning application · Enfield

20/01685/FUL.

109 Lancaster Road Enfield EN2 0JN

Full / Other Planning at 109 Lancaster Road Enfield EN2 0JN, received 3 Jun 2020 — approved on 29 Sep 2020 (delegated, Sana Akram).

EnfieldChaseEN2 0JN20/01685/FUL
ApprovedRefusedOther
At a glance · this applicationEnfield profile →
Approved
Outcome
29 Sep 2020
17 wks
Decision time
9 wks over the 8-week target
Conditions
not captured
4
Documents
4 linked
0
Objections
0 in support
No
Appeal
none recorded
Record from the Enfield planning register as captured; documents link to the council's own files. Nearby applications are context, not part of this application.
Application

What is it?

Single storey rear extension to retail unit.

Reference
20/01685/FUL
Type
Full
Case officer
Postcode
EN2 0JN
Ward
Council
Received
3 Jun 2020
Target date
29 Jul 2020
Decision date
29 Sep 2020
Decision route
Delegated (officer)
Status
Decided
Reference
20/01685/FUL
Type
Full
Show all 15 rows
Case officer
Postcode
EN2 0JN
Ward
Council
Received
3 Jun 2020
Target date
29 Jul 2020
Decision date
29 Sep 2020
Decision route
Delegated (officer)
Status
Decided
Documents

What was filed?

Document
Published
View
Decision Notice
29 Sept 2020
LOCATION AND BLOCK PLANS
3 Jun 2020
CIL questions
3 Jun 2020
Application Form - Without Personal Data
3 Jun 2020
Decision Notice
29 Sept 2020
LOCATION AND BLOCK PLANS
3 Jun 2020
CIL questions
3 Jun 2020
Show all 4 rows
Application Form - Without Personal Data
3 Jun 2020

Documents open on the Enfield portal (the portal needs its documents tab opened first — the link handles that). View the application page ↗

Decision

What happened?

Approved on 29 Sep 2020, delegated decision by Sana Akram — 17 weeks from submission (9 over the 8-week target).

Timeline

Date
Event
3 Jun 2020
Application received
29 Jul 2020
Statutory target date
29 Sep 2020
Delegated decision: Approved · Sana Akram
3 Jun 2020
Application received
29 Jul 2020
Statutory target date
29 Sep 2020
Delegated decision: Approved · Sana Akram

Public response

Measure
Count
Objections
0
In support
0
Total comments
0
Objections
0
In support
0
Total comments
0
People

Who is involved?

Name
Role
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer — delegated decision
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer — delegated decision
Place

What affects it?

Context around the site — not part of this application. Designations over the site: use the map's designations filter (conservation areas, listed buildings, Article 4, flood risk …). Decisions within 250 metres of the site are listed below — context, not this application.

Other applications within 250 metres (context — nearby, not this application)

No other geocoded decision is recorded within 250 metres.