Planning application · Enfield
20/02862/FUL.
Pathway House 80 Green Street Enfield EN3 7HP
Full / Other Planning at Pathway House 80 Green Street Enfield EN3 7HP, received 7 Sep 2020 — refused on 23 Jul 2021 (delegated, Tendai Mutasa).
ApprovedRefusedOther
At a glance · this applicationEnfield profile →
Refused
Outcome
23 Jul 2021
46 wks
Decision time
38 wks over the 8-week target
—
Conditions
not captured
6
Documents
6 linked
0
Objections
0 in support
No
Appeal
none recorded
Record from the Enfield planning register as captured; documents link to the council's own files. Nearby applications are context, not part of this application.
Application
What is it?
2-storey side extension, providing additional supported living accommodation.
Reference
20/02862/FUL
Type
Full
Applicant
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Postcode
EN3 7HP
Ward
Council
Received
7 Sep 2020
Validated
17 Sep 2020
Target date
12 Nov 2020
Decision date
23 Jul 2021
Decision route
Delegated (officer)
Status
Decided
Council register
Reference
20/02862/FUL
Type
Full
Show all 16 rows
Applicant
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Postcode
EN3 7HP
Ward
Council
Received
7 Sep 2020
Validated
17 Sep 2020
Target date
12 Nov 2020
Decision date
23 Jul 2021
Decision route
Delegated (officer)
Status
Decided
Council register
Documents
What was filed?
Document
Published
View
Documents open on the Enfield portal (the portal needs its documents tab opened first — the link handles that). View the application page ↗
Decision
What happened?
Refused on 23 Jul 2021, delegated decision by Tendai Mutasa — 46 weeks from submission (38 over the 8-week target).
Timeline
Date
Event
7 Sep 2020
Application received
17 Sep 2020
Application validated
12 Nov 2020
Statutory target date
23 Jul 2021
Delegated decision: Refused · Tendai Mutasa
7 Sep 2020
Application received
17 Sep 2020
Application validated
12 Nov 2020
Statutory target date
Show all 4 rows
23 Jul 2021
Delegated decision: Refused · Tendai Mutasa
Why it was refused
Reason
As stated on the decision notice
1
The proposed two storey side/rear extension, by reason of excessive bulk, width, depth and
overall excessive size would give rise to disproportionate and incongruous addition that would
dominate and subsume the character and appearance of the existing property and would fail to
respect the scale of the surrounding neighbouring dwellinghouses and pattern of development in the
surrounding area. Further to this, insufficient information has been provided to demonstrate that the
extended use of the proposed would not give rise to excessive activity, noise or general disturbance
associated with the use and would therefore fail to safeguard the residential amenities of the adjoining
occupiers. The proposals would be contrary to the National Planning Policy Framework (2019),
Policies D3 and D4 of the London Plan (2021), Policy CP 30 of the Enfield Core Strategy (2010), and
Policies DMD 14 and DMD 37 of the Enfield Development Management Document (2014)
Dated: 23 July 2021
Authorised on behalf of:
Mr A Higham
Head of Development Management
Development Management,
London Borough Enfield,
PO Box 53, Civic Centre,
Silver Street, Enfield,
Middlesex, EN1 3XE
If you have any questions about this decision, please contact the planning officer
tendai.mutasa@enfield.gov.uk.
List of plans and documents referred to in this Notice:
Title/Number Version TYPE
102/20- 2 Drawing
102/20- 3A Drawing
102/20 -4A Drawing
Additional Information
Rights of Applicants Aggrieved by Decision of Local Planning Authority
1
The proposed two storey side/rear extension, by reason of excessive bulk, width, depth and
overall excessive size would give rise to disproportionate and incongruous addition that would
dominate and subsume the character and appearance of the existing property and would fail to
respect the scale of the surrounding neighbouring dwellinghouses and pattern of development in the
surrounding area. Further to this, insufficient information has been provided to demonstrate that the
extended use of the proposed would not give rise to excessive activity, noise or general disturbance
associated with the use and would therefore fail to safeguard the residential amenities of the adjoining
occupiers. The proposals would be contrary to the National Planning Policy Framework (2019),
Policies D3 and D4 of the London Plan (2021), Policy CP 30 of the Enfield Core Strategy (2010), and
Policies DMD 14 and DMD 37 of the Enfield Development Management Document (2014)
Dated: 23 July 2021
Authorised on behalf of:
Mr A Higham
Head of Development Management
Development Management,
London Borough Enfield,
PO Box 53, Civic Centre,
Silver Street, Enfield,
Middlesex, EN1 3XE
If you have any questions about this decision, please contact the planning officer
tendai.mutasa@enfield.gov.uk.
List of plans and documents referred to in this Notice:
Title/Number Version TYPE
102/20- 2 Drawing
102/20- 3A Drawing
102/20 -4A Drawing
Additional Information
Rights of Applicants Aggrieved by Decision of Local Planning Authority
Policies cited
D3D4CP30DMD14DMD37NPPF
Public response
Measure
Count
Objections
0
In support
0
Total comments
0
Objections
0
In support
0
Total comments
0
People
Who is involved?
Name
Role
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer — delegated decision
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer — delegated decision
Place
What affects it?
Context around the site — not part of this application. Designations over the site: use the map's designations filter (conservation areas, listed buildings, Article 4, flood risk …). Decisions within 250 metres of the site are listed below — context, not this application.
Other applications within 250 metres (context — nearby, not this application)
No other geocoded decision is recorded within 250 metres.