Planning application · Enfield
20/03003/FUL.
50 Slades Hill Enfield EN2 7EE
Full / Other Planning at 50 Slades Hill Enfield EN2 7EE — decided.
ApprovedRefusedOther
At a glance · this applicationEnfield profile →
Decided
Outcome
no decision date
—
Decision time
submission → decision
—
Conditions
not captured
41
Documents
41 linked
0
Objections
0 in support
No
Appeal
none recorded
Record from the Enfield planning register as captured; documents link to the council's own files. Nearby applications are context, not part of this application.
Application
What is it?
The council record carries no proposal text.
Reference
20/03003/FUL
Type
Full
Applicant
Not recorded
Agent / consultant
None recorded
Case officer
Not recorded
Postcode
EN2 7EE
Ward
Council
Received
—
Decision date
—
Decision route
Not recorded
Status
Decided
Council register
Reference
20/03003/FUL
Type
Full
Show all 14 rows
Applicant
Not recorded
Agent / consultant
None recorded
Case officer
Not recorded
Postcode
EN2 7EE
Ward
Council
Received
—
Decision date
—
Decision route
Not recorded
Status
Decided
Council register
Documents
What was filed?
Document
Published
View
Documents open on the Enfield portal (the portal needs its documents tab opened first — the link handles that). View the application page ↗
Decision
What happened?
Status: Decided. No decision is recorded yet.
Timeline
No dated events are recorded.
Why it was refused
Reason
As stated on the decision notice
1
The proposal, by virtue of its excessive scale, inappropriate design and overall appearance,
would result in an out of keeping development in the streetscene and prevailing character in
the location. As such, the development is contrary to the high quality design aspirations of the
National Planning Policy Framework (2019), policies 7.4 and 7.6 of The London Plan (2016),
Policy CP30 of the Enfield Plan Core Strategy (2010), Policies DMD 6, DMD 8 and DMD37 of
the Development Management Document (2014).
Dated: 24 February 2021
Authorised on behalf of:
Mr A Higham
Head of Development Management
Development Management,
London Borough Enfield,
PO Box 53, Civic Centre,
Silver Street, Enfield,
Middlesex, EN1 3XE
If you have any questions about this decision, please contact the planning officer
tendai.mutasa@enfield.gov.uk.
List of plans and documents referred to in this Notice:
Title/Number Version TYPE
98-101 REV P01 Drawing
98-200 REV P01 Drawing
98-201 REV P01 Drawing
98-210 REV P02 Drawing
98-211 REV P02 Drawing
98-212 REV P02 Drawing
98-215 REV P01 Drawing
00-202 REV P02 Drawing
00-203 REV P03 Drawing
00-204 REV P01 Drawing
00-213 REV P02 Drawing
00-220 REV P01 Drawing
70-601 REV P02 Drawing
Design and access statement Supporting Information
Tree Survey plan Supporting Information
Transport supporting note Supporting Information
Sustainable design and construction statement Supporting Information
Energy Statement Supporting Information
Planning statement Supporting Information
SUDS Statement Supporting Information
Walkover Survey and Inspection Survey for Bat Roost Potential Supporting Information
Daylight and Sunlight report Supporting Information
Basement Impact Assessment Supporting Information
Rights of Applicants Aggrieved by Decision of Local Planning Authority
1
The proposal, by virtue of its excessive scale, inappropriate design and overall appearance,
would result in an out of keeping development in the streetscene and prevailing character in
the location. As such, the development is contrary to the high quality design aspirations of the
National Planning Policy Framework (2019), policies 7.4 and 7.6 of The London Plan (2016),
Policy CP30 of the Enfield Plan Core Strategy (2010), Policies DMD 6, DMD 8 and DMD37 of
the Development Management Document (2014).
Dated: 24 February 2021
Authorised on behalf of:
Mr A Higham
Head of Development Management
Development Management,
London Borough Enfield,
PO Box 53, Civic Centre,
Silver Street, Enfield,
Middlesex, EN1 3XE
If you have any questions about this decision, please contact the planning officer
tendai.mutasa@enfield.gov.uk.
List of plans and documents referred to in this Notice:
Title/Number Version TYPE
98-101 REV P01 Drawing
98-200 REV P01 Drawing
98-201 REV P01 Drawing
98-210 REV P02 Drawing
98-211 REV P02 Drawing
98-212 REV P02 Drawing
98-215 REV P01 Drawing
00-202 REV P02 Drawing
00-203 REV P03 Drawing
00-204 REV P01 Drawing
00-213 REV P02 Drawing
00-220 REV P01 Drawing
70-601 REV P02 Drawing
Design and access statement Supporting Information
Tree Survey plan Supporting Information
Transport supporting note Supporting Information
Sustainable design and construction statement Supporting Information
Energy Statement Supporting Information
Planning statement Supporting Information
SUDS Statement Supporting Information
Walkover Survey and Inspection Survey for Bat Roost Potential Supporting Information
Daylight and Sunlight report Supporting Information
Basement Impact Assessment Supporting Information
Rights of Applicants Aggrieved by Decision of Local Planning Authority
Policies cited
London Plan 7.4London Plan 7.6CP30DMD6DMD8DMD37NPPF
Public response
Measure
Count
Objections
0
In support
0
Total comments
0
Objections
0
In support
0
Total comments
0
People
Who is involved?
Name
Role
Applicant not recorded
The council record carries no applicant name.
No agent recorded
Applied without an agent, or agent not recorded.
Case officer not recorded
No case officer is recorded.
Applicant not recorded
The council record carries no applicant name.
No agent recorded
Applied without an agent, or agent not recorded.
Case officer not recorded
No case officer is recorded.
Place
What affects it?
Context around the site — not part of this application. Designations over the site: use the map's designations filter (conservation areas, listed buildings, Article 4, flood risk …). Decisions within 250 metres of the site are listed below — context, not this application.
Other applications within 250 metres (context — nearby, not this application)
No other geocoded decision is recorded within 250 metres.