Planning application · Enfield
21/01248/FUL.
Public House 155 Percival Road Enfield EN1 1QT
Full / Other Planning at Public House 155 Percival Road Enfield EN1 1QT, received 6 Apr 2021 — refused on 11 Apr 2022 by committee.
ApprovedRefusedOther
At a glance · this applicationEnfield profile →
Refused
Outcome
11 Apr 2022
53 wks
Decision time
45 wks over the 8-week target
—
Conditions
not captured
46
Documents
46 linked
0
Objections
0 in support
Yes
Appeal
Appeal Allowed Subject to Conditions
Record from the Enfield planning register as captured; documents link to the council's own files. Nearby applications are context, not part of this application.
Application
What is it?
Demolition of existing public house (sui-generis) and construction of part 3, part 4, part 5 storey residential building (Class C3) with ground floor public house (Use Class E / Sui-generis) and associated cycle and car parking, refuse storage and external landscaping.
Reference
21/01248/FUL
Type
Full
Applicant
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Postcode
EN1 1QT
Ward
Council
Received
6 Apr 2021
Validated
20 Apr 2021
Target date
20 Jul 2021
Decision date
11 Apr 2022
Decision route
Planning committee
Status
Decided
Council register
Reference
21/01248/FUL
Type
Full
Show all 16 rows
Applicant
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Postcode
EN1 1QT
Ward
Council
Received
6 Apr 2021
Validated
20 Apr 2021
Target date
20 Jul 2021
Decision date
11 Apr 2022
Decision route
Planning committee
Status
Decided
Council register
Documents
What was filed?
Document
Published
View
Show all 10 rows
Documents open on the Enfield portal (the portal needs its documents tab opened first — the link handles that). View the application page ↗
Decision
What happened?
Refused on 11 Apr 2022, determined by the planning committee — 53 weeks from submission (45 over the 8-week target).
Timeline
Date
Event
6 Apr 2021
Application received
20 Apr 2021
Application validated
20 Jul 2021
Statutory target date
11 Apr 2022
Committee decision: Refused
Appeal
Appeal decided · Appeal Allowed Subject to Conditions
6 Apr 2021
Application received
20 Apr 2021
Application validated
20 Jul 2021
Statutory target date
Show all 5 rows
11 Apr 2022
Committee decision: Refused
Appeal
Appeal decided · Appeal Allowed Subject to Conditions
Why it was refused
Reason
As stated on the decision notice
1
The proposed development, by reason of its bulk, scale and appearance would represent an
insufficiently high quality, incongruous and overly dominant form of development that, having regard to
housing need, the presumption in favour of approving sustainable development and the tilted balance,
fails to satisfactorily integrate with its surroundings negatively impacting on the enjoyment, function
and safety of surrounding spaces, detrimental to and out of keeping with the character and
appearance of the surrounding area which would not be outweighed by the public benefits of delivering
new residential accommodation. The proposal is therefore contrary to the design objectives as set out
in the National Planning Policy Framework 2021 (in particular Section 12); Polices D3, D4 and D9 of
the London Plan (2021); Policy CP30 of the Enfield Core Strategy (2010); Policy DMD37 and DMD 43
of the Enfield Development Management Document (2014).
2
The proposed development, by reason existing low on-street parking availability, would provide
inadequate additional capacity to serve overspill parking need from the on-site parking demand, and
would increase existing on-street parking pressures, reducing available spaces used by vehicles to
give way, and negatively impacting on the free flow and safety of traffic in the surrounding roads. As
such and having regard to housing need, the presumption in favour of approving sustainable
development and the tilted balance, it is considered that the harm to the surrounding highway network
in terms of the safety of highway users would not be outweighed by the public benefits of delivering
new residential accommodation the development is contrary to Policy T6 and T6.1 of the London Plan
(2021), Policy CP24 of the Enfield Core Strategy (2010) and Policy DMD 45 of the Enfield
Development Management Document (2014).
Dated: 11 April 2022
Authorised on behalf of:
Mr A Higham
Head of Development Management
Development Management,
London Borough Enfield,
PO Box 53, Civic Centre,
Silver Street, Enfield,
Middlesex, EN1 3XE
If you have any questions about this decision, please contact the planning officer
james.clark@enfield.gov.uk.
List of plans and documents referred to in this Notice:
Title/Number Version TYPE
Proposed Fourth Floor (Ref 2003 Rev a) Drawing
Proposed East elevation (Ref 3001 Rev a) Drawing
Proposed First & second floor (Ref 2001 Rev a) Drawing
Proposed Ground floor (Ref 2000 Rev a) Drawing
Proposed North elevation (Ref 3003 Rev a) Drawing
Proposed Roof floor (Ref 2005 Rev a) Drawing
Proposed Section AA (Ref 4000 Rev a) Drawing
Proposed Section BB (Ref 4001 Rev a) Drawing
Proposed section CC (Ref 4002 Rev a) Drawing
Proposed site and Location Plan (Ref 1500 Rev a) Drawing
Proposed south elevation (Ref 3000 Rev a) Drawing
Proposed Third floor (Ref 2002 Rev a) Drawing
Proposed West elevation (Ref 3002 Rev a) Drawing
Acoustic report (Ref 16000-NEA-01 Rev C) Prepared by Supporting Information
Clement acoustics dated August 2021 Supporting Information
DAS Planning Brochure-RevA_Part1 Supporting Information
DAS Planning Brochure-RevA_Part2 Supporting Information
Daylight & Sunlight Study (Prepared by Point March 2021) Supporting Information
Daylight and sunlight technical note (Prepared by 2 point - Supporting Information
August 2021) Supporting Information
Internal Daylight Report (Ref P2686 Version 2 Dated March Supporting Information
2021) Supporting Information
Energy Assessment (Prepared by Eight Associates Sept 2021) Supporting Information
Overheating (Prepared By eight associates Sept 2021) Supporting Information
SUDs Addendum Letter (Sept 2021) Supporting Information
SUDs strategy (Ref 5075 - prepared by eight associates) Dated Supporting Information
September 2021 Supporting Information
Transport Statement (Prepared by Patrick Parsons) Dated Supporting Information
August 2021 Version 3 Supporting Information
Travel plan (Prepared by Patrick Parsons) dated September Supporting Information
2021 - Version 3 Supporting Information
Arboricultural appraisal Report (Ref DEV200702-471 Rev 04 - Supporting Information
Dated 06-08-21) Supporting Information
Arboricultural Note (Tree T6) (Ref DEV200702-471 Rev 01 -
Dated 30-07-2021)
Tree plan (Ref MWA TPP 04)
Tree Survey Schedule (Ref MWA TSS 001)
Contamination DS (Ref 251956585 Dated 11-08-2020)
Parking Stress Survey Report (Prepared by Patrick Parsons Ref
A20176 Dated January 2021)
Biodiversity Appraisal (Eight associates Dated March 2021)
Health Impact Assessment
Additional Information
Rights of Applicants Aggrieved by Decision of Local Planning Authority
1
The proposed development, by reason of its bulk, scale and appearance would represent an
insufficiently high quality, incongruous and overly dominant form of development that, having regard to
housing need, the presumption in favour of approving sustainable development and the tilted balance,
fails to satisfactorily integrate with its surroundings negatively impacting on the enjoyment, function
and safety of surrounding spaces, detrimental to and out of keeping with the character and
appearance of the surrounding area which would not be outweighed by the public benefits of delivering
new residential accommodation. The proposal is therefore contrary to the design objectives as set out
in the National Planning Policy Framework 2021 (in particular Section 12); Polices D3, D4 and D9 of
the London Plan (2021); Policy CP30 of the Enfield Core Strategy (2010); Policy DMD37 and DMD 43
of the Enfield Development Management Document (2014).
2
The proposed development, by reason existing low on-street parking availability, would provide
inadequate additional capacity to serve overspill parking need from the on-site parking demand, and
would increase existing on-street parking pressures, reducing available spaces used by vehicles to
give way, and negatively impacting on the free flow and safety of traffic in the surrounding roads. As
such and having regard to housing need, the presumption in favour of approving sustainable
development and the tilted balance, it is considered that the harm to the surrounding highway network
in terms of the safety of highway users would not be outweighed by the public benefits of delivering
new residential accommodation the development is contrary to Policy T6 and T6.1 of the London Plan
(2021), Policy CP24 of the Enfield Core Strategy (2010) and Policy DMD 45 of the Enfield
Development Management Document (2014).
Dated: 11 April 2022
Authorised on behalf of:
Mr A Higham
Head of Development Management
Development Management,
London Borough Enfield,
PO Box 53, Civic Centre,
Silver Street, Enfield,
Middlesex, EN1 3XE
If you have any questions about this decision, please contact the planning officer
james.clark@enfield.gov.uk.
List of plans and documents referred to in this Notice:
Title/Number Version TYPE
Proposed Fourth Floor (Ref 2003 Rev a) Drawing
Proposed East elevation (Ref 3001 Rev a) Drawing
Proposed First & second floor (Ref 2001 Rev a) Drawing
Proposed Ground floor (Ref 2000 Rev a) Drawing
Proposed North elevation (Ref 3003 Rev a) Drawing
Proposed Roof floor (Ref 2005 Rev a) Drawing
Proposed Section AA (Ref 4000 Rev a) Drawing
Proposed Section BB (Ref 4001 Rev a) Drawing
Proposed section CC (Ref 4002 Rev a) Drawing
Proposed site and Location Plan (Ref 1500 Rev a) Drawing
Proposed south elevation (Ref 3000 Rev a) Drawing
Proposed Third floor (Ref 2002 Rev a) Drawing
Proposed West elevation (Ref 3002 Rev a) Drawing
Acoustic report (Ref 16000-NEA-01 Rev C) Prepared by Supporting Information
Clement acoustics dated August 2021 Supporting Information
DAS Planning Brochure-RevA_Part1 Supporting Information
DAS Planning Brochure-RevA_Part2 Supporting Information
Daylight & Sunlight Study (Prepared by Point March 2021) Supporting Information
Daylight and sunlight technical note (Prepared by 2 point - Supporting Information
August 2021) Supporting Information
Internal Daylight Report (Ref P2686 Version 2 Dated March Supporting Information
2021) Supporting Information
Energy Assessment (Prepared by Eight Associates Sept 2021) Supporting Information
Overheating (Prepared By eight associates Sept 2021) Supporting Information
SUDs Addendum Letter (Sept 2021) Supporting Information
SUDs strategy (Ref 5075 - prepared by eight associates) Dated Supporting Information
September 2021 Supporting Information
Transport Statement (Prepared by Patrick Parsons) Dated Supporting Information
August 2021 Version 3 Supporting Information
Travel plan (Prepared by Patrick Parsons) dated September Supporting Information
2021 - Version 3 Supporting Information
Arboricultural appraisal Report (Ref DEV200702-471 Rev 04 - Supporting Information
Dated 06-08-21) Supporting Information
Arboricultural Note (Tree T6) (Ref DEV200702-471 Rev 01 -
Dated 30-07-2021)
Tree plan (Ref MWA TPP 04)
Tree Survey Schedule (Ref MWA TSS 001)
Contamination DS (Ref 251956585 Dated 11-08-2020)
Parking Stress Survey Report (Prepared by Patrick Parsons Ref
A20176 Dated January 2021)
Biodiversity Appraisal (Eight associates Dated March 2021)
Health Impact Assessment
Additional Information
Rights of Applicants Aggrieved by Decision of Local Planning Authority
Policies cited
D3D4D9CP30DMD37DMD43NPPFT6T6.1CP24DMD45
Appeal
Appeal
Outcome
Appeal decided
Outcome: Appeal Allowed Subject to Conditions
Appeal decided
Outcome: Appeal Allowed Subject to Conditions
Public response
Measure
Count
Objections
0
In support
0
Total comments
0
Objections
0
In support
0
Total comments
0
People
Who is involved?
Name
Role
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer (report to committee)
Determined at committee
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer (report to committee)
Show all 4 rows
Determined at committee
Place
What affects it?
Context around the site — not part of this application. Designations over the site: use the map's designations filter (conservation areas, listed buildings, Article 4, flood risk …). Decisions within 250 metres of the site are listed below — context, not this application.
Other applications within 250 metres (context — nearby, not this application)
No other geocoded decision is recorded within 250 metres.