Planning application · Enfield
21/02592/FUL.
590 Hertford Road Enfield EN3 5SX
Full / Other Planning at 590 Hertford Road Enfield EN3 5SX, received 2 Jul 2021 — refused on 26 Apr 2022 (delegated, Misbah Uddin).
ApprovedRefusedOther
At a glance · this applicationEnfield profile →
Refused
Outcome
26 Apr 2022
43 wks
Decision time
35 wks over the 8-week target
—
Conditions
not captured
7
Documents
7 linked
0
Objections
0 in support
Yes
Appeal
Appeal Allowed Subject to Conditions
Record from the Enfield planning register as captured; documents link to the council's own files. Nearby applications are context, not part of this application.
Application
What is it?
Outbuilding at rear to be used as private gym.
Reference
21/02592/FUL
Type
Full
Applicant
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Postcode
EN3 5SX
Ward
Council
Received
2 Jul 2021
Validated
13 Jul 2021
Target date
7 Sep 2021
Decision date
26 Apr 2022
Decision route
Delegated (officer)
Status
Decided
Council register
Reference
21/02592/FUL
Type
Full
Show all 16 rows
Applicant
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Postcode
EN3 5SX
Ward
Council
Received
2 Jul 2021
Validated
13 Jul 2021
Target date
7 Sep 2021
Decision date
26 Apr 2022
Decision route
Delegated (officer)
Status
Decided
Council register
Documents
What was filed?
Document
Published
View
Documents open on the Enfield portal (the portal needs its documents tab opened first — the link handles that). View the application page ↗
Decision
What happened?
Refused on 26 Apr 2022, delegated decision by Misbah Uddin — 43 weeks from submission (35 over the 8-week target).
Timeline
Date
Event
2 Jul 2021
Application received
13 Jul 2021
Application validated
7 Sep 2021
Statutory target date
26 Apr 2022
Delegated decision: Refused · Misbah Uddin
Appeal
Appeal decided · Appeal Allowed Subject to Conditions
2 Jul 2021
Application received
13 Jul 2021
Application validated
7 Sep 2021
Statutory target date
Show all 5 rows
26 Apr 2022
Delegated decision: Refused · Misbah Uddin
Appeal
Appeal decided · Appeal Allowed Subject to Conditions
Why it was refused
Reason
As stated on the decision notice
1
The proposed development, by virtue of its size, footprint, siting, and design, would appear
visually intrusive, inappropriate and incongruous with the character and appearance of the surrounding
area, contrary to the National Planning Policy Framework (NPPF, 2021), Policies D4 of the London
Plan (2021), Policies DMD 7, DMD 25 and DMD 37 of the Development Management Document
(2014) and Policies CP4 and CP30 of the Core Strategy (2010).
Dated: 26 April 2022
Authorised on behalf of:
Mr A Higham
Head of Development Management
Development Management,
London Borough Enfield,
PO Box 53, Civic Centre,
Silver Street, Enfield,
Middlesex, EN1 3XE
If you have any questions about this decision, please contact the planning officer
misbah.uddin@enfield.gov.uk.
List of plans and documents referred to in this Notice:
Title/Number Version TYPE
Site Location Plan Drawing
Block Plan Drawing
FR1/ 300621/PL 1 Existing Plan Drawing
FR1 /300621/PL3 Proposed Elevation Drawing
FR1/ 300621/PL 2 Proposed Floor Plan Drawing
Additional Information
Rights of Applicants Aggrieved by Decision of Local Planning Authority
1
The proposed development, by virtue of its size, footprint, siting, and design, would appear
visually intrusive, inappropriate and incongruous with the character and appearance of the surrounding
area, contrary to the National Planning Policy Framework (NPPF, 2021), Policies D4 of the London
Plan (2021), Policies DMD 7, DMD 25 and DMD 37 of the Development Management Document
(2014) and Policies CP4 and CP30 of the Core Strategy (2010).
Dated: 26 April 2022
Authorised on behalf of:
Mr A Higham
Head of Development Management
Development Management,
London Borough Enfield,
PO Box 53, Civic Centre,
Silver Street, Enfield,
Middlesex, EN1 3XE
If you have any questions about this decision, please contact the planning officer
misbah.uddin@enfield.gov.uk.
List of plans and documents referred to in this Notice:
Title/Number Version TYPE
Site Location Plan Drawing
Block Plan Drawing
FR1/ 300621/PL 1 Existing Plan Drawing
FR1 /300621/PL3 Proposed Elevation Drawing
FR1/ 300621/PL 2 Proposed Floor Plan Drawing
Additional Information
Rights of Applicants Aggrieved by Decision of Local Planning Authority
Policies cited
D4DMD7DMD25DMD37CP4CP30NPPF
Appeal
Appeal
Outcome
Appeal decided
Outcome: Appeal Allowed Subject to Conditions
Appeal decided
Outcome: Appeal Allowed Subject to Conditions
Public response
Measure
Count
Objections
0
In support
0
Total comments
0
Objections
0
In support
0
Total comments
0
People
Who is involved?
Name
Role
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer — delegated decision
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer — delegated decision
Place
What affects it?
Context around the site — not part of this application. Designations over the site: use the map's designations filter (conservation areas, listed buildings, Article 4, flood risk …). Decisions within 250 metres of the site are listed below — context, not this application.
Other applications within 250 metres (context — nearby, not this application)
No other geocoded decision is recorded within 250 metres.