Planning application · Enfield
22/01022/FUL.
Brownlow Lodge Brownlow Road London N11 2BL
Full / Other Planning at Brownlow Lodge Brownlow Road London N11 2BL, received 22 Mar 2022 — refused on 12 May 2022 (delegated, Ronny Ferley).
ApprovedRefusedOther
At a glance · this applicationEnfield profile →
Refused
Outcome
12 May 2022
7 wks
Decision time
inside the 8-week target
—
Conditions
not captured
16
Documents
16 linked
0
Objections
0 in support
Yes
Appeal
Appeal Dismissed
Record from the Enfield planning register as captured; documents link to the council's own files. Nearby applications are context, not part of this application.
Application
What is it?
Creation of additional third floor roof extension to provide 2Nos. 1 bedroom self contained flats
Reference
22/01022/FUL
Type
Full
Applicant
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Postcode
N11 2BL
Ward
Council
Received
22 Mar 2022
Validated
29 Mar 2022
Target date
24 May 2022
Decision date
12 May 2022
Decision route
Delegated (officer)
Status
Decided
Council register
Reference
22/01022/FUL
Type
Full
Show all 16 rows
Applicant
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Postcode
N11 2BL
Ward
Council
Received
22 Mar 2022
Validated
29 Mar 2022
Target date
24 May 2022
Decision date
12 May 2022
Decision route
Delegated (officer)
Status
Decided
Council register
Documents
What was filed?
Document
Published
View
Documents open on the Enfield portal (the portal needs its documents tab opened first — the link handles that). View the application page ↗
Decision
What happened?
Refused on 12 May 2022, delegated decision by Ronny Ferley — 7 weeks from submission.
Timeline
Date
Event
22 Mar 2022
Application received
29 Mar 2022
Application validated
24 May 2022
Statutory target date
12 May 2022
Delegated decision: Refused · Ronny Ferley
Appeal
Appeal decided · Appeal Dismissed
22 Mar 2022
Application received
29 Mar 2022
Application validated
24 May 2022
Statutory target date
Show all 5 rows
12 May 2022
Delegated decision: Refused · Ronny Ferley
Appeal
Appeal decided · Appeal Dismissed
Why it was refused
Reason
As stated on the decision notice
1
The proposal by reason of its inappropriate height, siting and scale, as well as obtrusive form
and significant occupation of the host roof would constitute an intrusive, incongruous and dominant
form of overdevelopment of the host roof. This would give rise to a protuberant, top heavy and
conspicuous roof form visually at odds with the surrounding vertical emphasis and associated
roofscape along the street, to stand out negatively and appear as unwieldy, stark and discordant to the
character of the vertical built form and rhythm of the roofscape, in a visually jarring manner to the
context. As such, the proposed scheme is contrary to the National Planning Policy Framework (NPPF,
2021), Policy D4 of the London Plan (2021), DMD 6, DMD 8, DMD 13, DMD 37 and DMD 38 of the
Development Management Document (2014) and Policy CP30 of the Core Strategy (2010).
Dated: 12 May 2022
Authorised on behalf of:
Mr A Higham
Head of Development Management
Development Management,
London Borough Enfield,
PO Box 53, Civic Centre,
Silver Street, Enfield,
Middlesex, EN1 3XE
If you have any questions about this decision, please contact the planning officer
ronny.ferley@enfield.gov.uk.
List of plans and documents referred to in this Notice:
Title/Number Version TYPE
MB/BL/P01 Drawing
MB BL P02 Drawing
MB BL P03 Drawing
MB BL P04 Drawing
MB BL P05 Drawing
MB BL P06 Drawing
Site Location Plan Drawing
Block Plan Drawing
Sustainability and Energy Statement by Melin (Not Dated) Supporting Information
Daylight and Sunlight Assessment BRE Report (Mar 2022) Ref: P122740- Supporting Information
Design & Access Statement by Altaras Architecture 1000 Supporting Information
Additional Information
Rights of Applicants Aggrieved by Decision of Local Planning Authority
1
The proposal by reason of its inappropriate height, siting and scale, as well as obtrusive form
and significant occupation of the host roof would constitute an intrusive, incongruous and dominant
form of overdevelopment of the host roof. This would give rise to a protuberant, top heavy and
conspicuous roof form visually at odds with the surrounding vertical emphasis and associated
roofscape along the street, to stand out negatively and appear as unwieldy, stark and discordant to the
character of the vertical built form and rhythm of the roofscape, in a visually jarring manner to the
context. As such, the proposed scheme is contrary to the National Planning Policy Framework (NPPF,
2021), Policy D4 of the London Plan (2021), DMD 6, DMD 8, DMD 13, DMD 37 and DMD 38 of the
Development Management Document (2014) and Policy CP30 of the Core Strategy (2010).
Dated: 12 May 2022
Authorised on behalf of:
Mr A Higham
Head of Development Management
Development Management,
London Borough Enfield,
PO Box 53, Civic Centre,
Silver Street, Enfield,
Middlesex, EN1 3XE
If you have any questions about this decision, please contact the planning officer
ronny.ferley@enfield.gov.uk.
List of plans and documents referred to in this Notice:
Title/Number Version TYPE
MB/BL/P01 Drawing
MB BL P02 Drawing
MB BL P03 Drawing
MB BL P04 Drawing
MB BL P05 Drawing
MB BL P06 Drawing
Site Location Plan Drawing
Block Plan Drawing
Sustainability and Energy Statement by Melin (Not Dated) Supporting Information
Daylight and Sunlight Assessment BRE Report (Mar 2022) Ref: P122740- Supporting Information
Design & Access Statement by Altaras Architecture 1000 Supporting Information
Additional Information
Rights of Applicants Aggrieved by Decision of Local Planning Authority
Policies cited
D4DMD6DMD8DMD13DMD37DMD38CP30NPPF
Appeal
Appeal
Outcome
Appeal decided
Outcome: Appeal Dismissed
Appeal decided
Outcome: Appeal Dismissed
Public response
Measure
Count
Objections
0
In support
0
Total comments
0
Objections
0
In support
0
Total comments
0
People
Who is involved?
Name
Role
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer — delegated decision
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer — delegated decision
Place
What affects it?
Context around the site — not part of this application. Designations over the site: use the map's designations filter (conservation areas, listed buildings, Article 4, flood risk …). Decisions within 250 metres of the site are listed below — context, not this application.
Other applications within 250 metres (context — nearby, not this application)
No other geocoded decision is recorded within 250 metres.