Planning Atlas
Planning AtlasEnfieldLower Edmonton ward22/01739/FUL
Planning application · Enfield

22/01739/FUL.

272 St Marys Road London N9 8NP

Full / Other Planning at 272 St Marys Road London N9 8NP, received 17 May 2022 — refused on 24 Nov 2022 by committee.

EnfieldLower EdmontonN9 8NP22/01739/FUL
ApprovedRefusedOther
At a glance · this applicationEnfield profile →
Refused
Outcome
24 Nov 2022
27 wks
Decision time
19 wks over the 8-week target
Conditions
not captured
10
Documents
10 linked
1
Objections
0 in support
Yes
Appeal
Appeal Dismissed
Record from the Enfield planning register as captured; documents link to the council's own files. Nearby applications are context, not part of this application.
Application

What is it?

Conversion of roof space to create self-contained unit involving 1 rear dormer.

Reference
22/01739/FUL
Type
Full
Applicant
Case officer
Postcode
N9 8NP
Council
Received
17 May 2022
Validated
7 Jun 2022
Target date
2 Aug 2022
Decision date
24 Nov 2022
Decision route
Planning committee
Status
Decided
Reference
22/01739/FUL
Type
Full
Show all 16 rows
Applicant
Case officer
Postcode
N9 8NP
Council
Received
17 May 2022
Validated
7 Jun 2022
Target date
2 Aug 2022
Decision date
24 Nov 2022
Decision route
Planning committee
Status
Decided
Documents

What was filed?

Document
Published
View
Decision Notice
24 Nov 2022
Front elevation existing and proposed
17 Nov 2022
Flood Risk Assessment
17 Nov 2022
AMENDMENTAPPLICATION FORM - WITHOUT PERSONAL DATA
7 Jun 2022
COMMUNITY INFRASTRUCTURE LEVY - COMPLETED FORM
17 May 2022
EXISTING AND PROPOSED DRAWINGS
17 May 2022
Photographs and photomontages
17 May 2022
The location plan
17 May 2022
VELUX CABRIO BALCONY
17 May 2022
PLANNING AND DESIGN AND ACCESS STATEMENT
17 May 2022
Decision Notice
24 Nov 2022
Front elevation existing and proposed
17 Nov 2022
Flood Risk Assessment
17 Nov 2022
Show all 10 rows
AMENDMENTAPPLICATION FORM - WITHOUT PERSONAL DATA
7 Jun 2022
COMMUNITY INFRASTRUCTURE LEVY - COMPLETED FORM
17 May 2022
EXISTING AND PROPOSED DRAWINGS
17 May 2022
Photographs and photomontages
17 May 2022
The location plan
17 May 2022
VELUX CABRIO BALCONY
17 May 2022
PLANNING AND DESIGN AND ACCESS STATEMENT
17 May 2022

Documents open on the Enfield portal (the portal needs its documents tab opened first — the link handles that). View the application page ↗

Decision

What happened?

Refused on 24 Nov 2022, determined by the planning committee — 27 weeks from submission (19 over the 8-week target).

Timeline

Date
Event
17 May 2022
Application received
7 Jun 2022
Application validated
2 Aug 2022
Statutory target date
24 Nov 2022
Committee decision: Refused
Appeal
Appeal decided · Appeal Dismissed
17 May 2022
Application received
7 Jun 2022
Application validated
2 Aug 2022
Statutory target date
Show all 5 rows
24 Nov 2022
Committee decision: Refused
Appeal
Appeal decided · Appeal Dismissed

Why it was refused

Reason
As stated on the decision notice
1
The proposed development, by virtue of the ceiling heights and internal layouts, poor quality of outlook and the insufficient provision of private amenity space, would result in substandard accommodation and be harmful to the amenities of future occupiers, which having regard to housing need, the presumption in favour of approving sustainable development and the tilted balance, would not be outweighed by the public benefit of delivering new residential accommodation. The proposal is therefore contrary to the objectives as set out in the National Planning Policy Framework (2021) (in particular Section 12), policy D6 of the London Plan (2021), policies CP4 and CP30 of The Enfield Plan Core Strategy (2010) and to policies DMD5, DMD8, and DMD9 of the Development Management Document (2014). Dated: 24 November 2022 Authorised on behalf of: Mr A Higham Head of Development Management Development Management, London Borough Enfield, PO Box 53, Civic Centre, Silver Street, Enfield, Middlesex, EN1 3XE If you have any questions about this decision, please contact the planning officer david.maguire@enfield.gov.uk. List of plans and documents referred to in this Notice: Title/Number Version TYPE EX-STM272-2 Drawing EX-STM272-1 Drawing PR-STM272-1 Drawing Additional Information Rights of Applicants Aggrieved by Decision of Local Planning Authority
1
The proposed development, by virtue of the ceiling heights and internal layouts, poor quality of outlook and the insufficient provision of private amenity space, would result in substandard accommodation and be harmful to the amenities of future occupiers, which having regard to housing need, the presumption in favour of approving sustainable development and the tilted balance, would not be outweighed by the public benefit of delivering new residential accommodation. The proposal is therefore contrary to the objectives as set out in the National Planning Policy Framework (2021) (in particular Section 12), policy D6 of the London Plan (2021), policies CP4 and CP30 of The Enfield Plan Core Strategy (2010) and to policies DMD5, DMD8, and DMD9 of the Development Management Document (2014). Dated: 24 November 2022 Authorised on behalf of: Mr A Higham Head of Development Management Development Management, London Borough Enfield, PO Box 53, Civic Centre, Silver Street, Enfield, Middlesex, EN1 3XE If you have any questions about this decision, please contact the planning officer david.maguire@enfield.gov.uk. List of plans and documents referred to in this Notice: Title/Number Version TYPE EX-STM272-2 Drawing EX-STM272-1 Drawing PR-STM272-1 Drawing Additional Information Rights of Applicants Aggrieved by Decision of Local Planning Authority
Policies cited
D6CP4CP30DMD9NPPF

Appeal

Appeal
Outcome
Appeal decided
Outcome: Appeal Dismissed
Appeal decided
Outcome: Appeal Dismissed

Public response

Measure
Count
Objections
1
In support
0
Total comments
1
Objections
1
In support
0
Total comments
1
People

Who is involved?

Name
Role
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer (report to committee)
Determined at committee
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer (report to committee)
Show all 4 rows
Determined at committee
Place

What affects it?

Context around the site — not part of this application. Designations over the site: use the map's designations filter (conservation areas, listed buildings, Article 4, flood risk …). Decisions within 250 metres of the site are listed below — context, not this application.

Other applications within 250 metres (context — nearby, not this application)

No other geocoded decision is recorded within 250 metres.