Planning Atlas
Planning AtlasEnfieldRidgeway wardEN2 8AL23/00713/HOU
Planning application · Enfield

23/00713/HOU.

261 The Ridgeway Enfield EN2 8AL

Householder at 261 The Ridgeway Enfield EN2 8AL, received 6 Mar 2023 — refused on 5 May 2023 (delegated, Amma Busia).

EnfieldRidgewayEN2 8AL23/00713/HOU
ApprovedRefusedOther
At a glance · this applicationEnfield profile →
Refused
Outcome
5 May 2023
9 wks
Decision time
1 wks over the 8-week target
Conditions
not captured
22
Documents
22 linked
0
Objections
0 in support
No
Appeal
none recorded
Record from the Enfield planning register as captured; documents link to the council's own files. Nearby applications are context, not part of this application.
Application

What is it?

First floor side/ rear extension together with roof extension.

Reference
23/00713/HOU
Type
Householder
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Postcode
Council
Received
6 Mar 2023
Validated
13 Mar 2023
Target date
8 May 2023
Decision date
5 May 2023
Decision route
Delegated (officer)
Status
Decided
Reference
23/00713/HOU
Type
Householder
Show all 16 rows
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Postcode
Council
Received
6 Mar 2023
Validated
13 Mar 2023
Target date
8 May 2023
Decision date
5 May 2023
Decision route
Delegated (officer)
Status
Decided
Documents

What was filed?

Document
Published
View
Decision Notice
5 May 2023
Report
5 May 2023
proposed section
14 Mar 2023
EXISTING section
14 Mar 2023
EXISTING LOFT PLAN
14 Mar 2023
PROPOSED LOFT PLAN
14 Mar 2023
EXISTING SIDE ELEVATION
14 Mar 2023
Proposal
6 Mar 2023
Application Form - Without Personal Data
6 Mar 2023
The location plan
6 Mar 2023
Decision Notice
5 May 2023
Report
5 May 2023
proposed section
14 Mar 2023
Show all 10 rows
EXISTING section
14 Mar 2023
EXISTING LOFT PLAN
14 Mar 2023
PROPOSED LOFT PLAN
14 Mar 2023
EXISTING SIDE ELEVATION
14 Mar 2023
Proposal
6 Mar 2023
Application Form - Without Personal Data
6 Mar 2023
The location plan
6 Mar 2023

Documents open on the Enfield portal (the portal needs its documents tab opened first — the link handles that). View the application page ↗

Decision

What happened?

Refused on 5 May 2023, delegated decision by Amma Busia — 9 weeks from submission (1 over the 8-week target).

Timeline

Date
Event
6 Mar 2023
Application received
13 Mar 2023
Application validated
8 May 2023
Statutory target date
5 May 2023
Delegated decision: Refused · Amma Busia
6 Mar 2023
Application received
13 Mar 2023
Application validated
8 May 2023
Statutory target date
Show all 4 rows
5 May 2023
Delegated decision: Refused · Amma Busia

Why it was refused

Reason
As stated on the decision notice
1
The proposed first floor side/ rear extension by virtue of its height, projection, width, detailed design, form, siting and bulk would appear visually intrusive, incongruous and out of keeping with the character and appearance of the host building and the surrounding area which it forms part, contrary to Section 12 of the National Planning Policy Framework (2021), Policies D3, D4 of the London Plan (2021), CP30 of the Enfield Core Strategy (2010), DMD6, DMD8, DMD13, DMD14 and DMD37 of the Enfield Development Management Document (2014). Dated: 5 May 2023 Authorised on behalf of: Mr A Higham Head of Development Management Development Management, London Borough Enfield, PO Box 53, Civic Centre, Silver Street, Enfield, Middlesex, EN1 3XE If you have any questions about this decision, please contact the planning officer amma.busia@enfield.gov.uk. List of plans and documents referred to in this Notice: Title/Number Version TYPE PL011 Drawing PL020 Drawing PL010 Drawing PL022 Drawing PL012 Drawing PL101 Drawing PL100 Drawing PL200 Drawing PL202 Drawing PL102 Drawing PL201 Drawing PL013 Drawing PL030 Drawing PL021 rev A Drawing PL103 Drawing PL300 Drawing P001 Drawing Additional Information APPEAL Should you (an applicant or agent) feel aggrieved by the decision of the Council to either refuse permission or to grant permission subject to conditions, you can
1
The proposed first floor side/ rear extension by virtue of its height, projection, width, detailed design, form, siting and bulk would appear visually intrusive, incongruous and out of keeping with the character and appearance of the host building and the surrounding area which it forms part, contrary to Section 12 of the National Planning Policy Framework (2021), Policies D3, D4 of the London Plan (2021), CP30 of the Enfield Core Strategy (2010), DMD6, DMD8, DMD13, DMD14 and DMD37 of the Enfield Development Management Document (2014). Dated: 5 May 2023 Authorised on behalf of: Mr A Higham Head of Development Management Development Management, London Borough Enfield, PO Box 53, Civic Centre, Silver Street, Enfield, Middlesex, EN1 3XE If you have any questions about this decision, please contact the planning officer amma.busia@enfield.gov.uk. List of plans and documents referred to in this Notice: Title/Number Version TYPE PL011 Drawing PL020 Drawing PL010 Drawing PL022 Drawing PL012 Drawing PL101 Drawing PL100 Drawing PL200 Drawing PL202 Drawing PL102 Drawing PL201 Drawing PL013 Drawing PL030 Drawing PL021 rev A Drawing PL103 Drawing PL300 Drawing P001 Drawing Additional Information APPEAL Should you (an applicant or agent) feel aggrieved by the decision of the Council to either refuse permission or to grant permission subject to conditions, you can
Policies cited
National Planning Policy Framework 12D3D4CP30DMD6DMD8DMD13DMD14DMD37NPPF

Public response

Measure
Count
Objections
0
In support
0
Total comments
0
Objections
0
In support
0
Total comments
0
People

Who is involved?

Name
Role
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer — delegated decision
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer — delegated decision
Place

What affects it?

Context around the site — not part of this application. Designations over the site: use the map's designations filter (conservation areas, listed buildings, Article 4, flood risk …). Decisions within 250 metres of the site are listed below — context, not this application.

Other applications within 250 metres (context — nearby, not this application)

No other geocoded decision is recorded within 250 metres.