Planning application · Enfield
23/01774/FUL.
Enfield Golf Club Old Park Road South Enfield EN2 7DA
Full / Other Planning at Enfield Golf Club Old Park Road South Enfield EN2 7DA, received 31 May 2023 — refused on 2 Aug 2023 (delegated, Dino Ustic).
ApprovedRefusedOther
At a glance · this applicationEnfield profile →
Refused
Outcome
2 Aug 2023
9 wks
Decision time
1 wks over the 8-week target
—
Conditions
not captured
14
Documents
14 linked
0
Objections
0 in support
No
Appeal
none recorded
Record from the Enfield planning register as captured; documents link to the council's own files. Nearby applications are context, not part of this application.
Application
What is it?
Single storey rear extension to pro shop , with part 1st floor rear/side infill extension, together with change of use of 1st floor from residential (Class C3) to offices (Class E) involving removal of rear dormer changing the flat roof to a pitched roof, canopy roof over entrance, balustrade, relocation of entrance to side, access ramps, relocation of golf buggy parking area, and internal alterations to club house.
Reference
23/01774/FUL
Type
Full
Applicant
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Postcode
EN2 7DA
Ward
Council
Received
31 May 2023
Validated
8 Jun 2023
Target date
3 Aug 2023
Decision date
2 Aug 2023
Decision route
Delegated (officer)
Status
Decided
Council register
Reference
23/01774/FUL
Type
Full
Show all 16 rows
Applicant
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Postcode
EN2 7DA
Ward
Council
Received
31 May 2023
Validated
8 Jun 2023
Target date
3 Aug 2023
Decision date
2 Aug 2023
Decision route
Delegated (officer)
Status
Decided
Council register
Documents
What was filed?
Document
Published
View
Show all 10 rows
Documents open on the Enfield portal (the portal needs its documents tab opened first — the link handles that). View the application page ↗
Decision
What happened?
Refused on 2 Aug 2023, delegated decision by Dino Ustic — 9 weeks from submission (1 over the 8-week target).
Timeline
Date
Event
31 May 2023
Application received
8 Jun 2023
Application validated
3 Aug 2023
Statutory target date
2 Aug 2023
Delegated decision: Refused · Dino Ustic
31 May 2023
Application received
8 Jun 2023
Application validated
3 Aug 2023
Statutory target date
Show all 4 rows
2 Aug 2023
Delegated decision: Refused · Dino Ustic
Why it was refused
Reason
As stated on the decision notice
1
The proposed development, by reason of the change of use of the first floor and part ground
floor from residential (Class C3) to offices (Class E), would result in the loss of a self-contained 3
bedroom family unit for which there is an identified need in the borough. No evidence has been
submitted to justify the loss of the existing residential unit; to demonstrate that the existing residential
use is unsatisfactory; or to demonstrate that the development would provide a community for which
there is an identified need which may outweigh the loss of the existing residential unit. The proposal is
therefore contrary to Policy CP2 and CP30 of the Core Strategy (2010) and Policy DMD 4 of the
Development Management Document (2014).
Dated: 2 August 2023
Authorised on behalf of:
Mr A Higham
Head of Development Management
Development Management,
London Borough Enfield,
PO Box 53, Civic Centre,
Silver Street, Enfield,
Middlesex, EN1 3XE
If you have any questions about this decision, please contact the planning officer
dino.ustic@enfield.gov.uk.
List of plans and documents referred to in this Notice:
Title/Number Version TYPE
Drw No: 3387/1 Drawing
Drw No: 3387/2 Drawing
Drw No: 3387/3 Drawing
Drw No: 3387/7 Drawing
Drw No: 3387/8 Drawing
Drw No: 3387/9 Drawing
Drw No: S1 Drawing
Drw No: B1 (Existing) Drawing
Drw No: B1 (Proposed) Drawing
Design and Access Statement Drawing
APPEAL GUIDANCE:
Should you (an applicant or agent) feel aggrieved by the decision of the Council to either refuse
permission or to grant permission subject to conditions, you can
1
The proposed development, by reason of the change of use of the first floor and part ground
floor from residential (Class C3) to offices (Class E), would result in the loss of a self-contained 3
bedroom family unit for which there is an identified need in the borough. No evidence has been
submitted to justify the loss of the existing residential unit; to demonstrate that the existing residential
use is unsatisfactory; or to demonstrate that the development would provide a community for which
there is an identified need which may outweigh the loss of the existing residential unit. The proposal is
therefore contrary to Policy CP2 and CP30 of the Core Strategy (2010) and Policy DMD 4 of the
Development Management Document (2014).
Dated: 2 August 2023
Authorised on behalf of:
Mr A Higham
Head of Development Management
Development Management,
London Borough Enfield,
PO Box 53, Civic Centre,
Silver Street, Enfield,
Middlesex, EN1 3XE
If you have any questions about this decision, please contact the planning officer
dino.ustic@enfield.gov.uk.
List of plans and documents referred to in this Notice:
Title/Number Version TYPE
Drw No: 3387/1 Drawing
Drw No: 3387/2 Drawing
Drw No: 3387/3 Drawing
Drw No: 3387/7 Drawing
Drw No: 3387/8 Drawing
Drw No: 3387/9 Drawing
Drw No: S1 Drawing
Drw No: B1 (Existing) Drawing
Drw No: B1 (Proposed) Drawing
Design and Access Statement Drawing
APPEAL GUIDANCE:
Should you (an applicant or agent) feel aggrieved by the decision of the Council to either refuse
permission or to grant permission subject to conditions, you can
Policies cited
CP2CP30DMD4
Public response
Measure
Count
Objections
0
In support
0
Total comments
0
Objections
0
In support
0
Total comments
0
People
Who is involved?
Name
Role
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer — delegated decision
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer — delegated decision
Place
What affects it?
Context around the site — not part of this application. Designations over the site: use the map's designations filter (conservation areas, listed buildings, Article 4, flood risk …). Decisions within 250 metres of the site are listed below — context, not this application.
Other applications within 250 metres (context — nearby, not this application)
No other geocoded decision is recorded within 250 metres.