Planning application · Enfield
23/02275/FUL.
Commercial Premises 594 Green Lanes London N13 5RY
Full / Other Planning at Commercial Premises 594 Green Lanes London N13 5RY, received 12 Jul 2023 — refused on 1 Sep 2023 (delegated, Kate Vaggers).
ApprovedRefusedOther
At a glance · this applicationEnfield profile →
Refused
Outcome
1 Sep 2023
7 wks
Decision time
inside the 8-week target
—
Conditions
not captured
9
Documents
9 linked
0
Objections
0 in support
No
Appeal
none recorded
Record from the Enfield planning register as captured; documents link to the council's own files. Nearby applications are context, not part of this application.
Application
What is it?
Vehicular access.
Reference
23/02275/FUL
Type
Full
Applicant
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Postcode
N13 5RY
Ward
Council
Received
12 Jul 2023
Target date
6 Sep 2023
Decision date
1 Sep 2023
Decision route
Delegated (officer)
Status
Decided
Council register
Reference
23/02275/FUL
Type
Full
Show all 15 rows
Applicant
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Postcode
N13 5RY
Ward
Council
Received
12 Jul 2023
Target date
6 Sep 2023
Decision date
1 Sep 2023
Decision route
Delegated (officer)
Status
Decided
Council register
Documents
What was filed?
Document
Published
View
Documents open on the Enfield portal (the portal needs its documents tab opened first — the link handles that). View the application page ↗
Decision
What happened?
Refused on 1 Sep 2023, delegated decision by Kate Vaggers — 7 weeks from submission.
Timeline
Date
Event
12 Jul 2023
Application received
6 Sep 2023
Statutory target date
1 Sep 2023
Delegated decision: Refused · Kate Vaggers
12 Jul 2023
Application received
6 Sep 2023
Statutory target date
1 Sep 2023
Delegated decision: Refused · Kate Vaggers
Why it was refused
Reason
As stated on the decision notice
1
The proposed crossover will result in vehicles reversing from or into the Classified Road
leading to vehicles stopping or slowing on Green Lanes thus adversely affecting highway safety and
prejudicial to the free flow of traffic, including pedestrians, cyclists using the cycle lane and public
transport, on the Classified Road. In these respects, the proposal would be contrary to the Council's
Technical Footway Guidance 2013, Policy DMD 46 of the Development Management Document 2014,
and Core Strategy 2010 Policies 24 and 30, as well as the aims of the NPPF.
Dated: 1 September 2023
Authorised on behalf of:
Mr A Higham
Head of Development Management
Development Management,
London Borough Enfield,
PO Box 53, Civic Centre,
Silver Street, Enfield,
Middlesex, EN1 3XE
If you have any questions about this decision, please contact the planning officer
kate.vaggers@enfield.gov.uk.
List of plans and documents referred to in this Notice:
Title/Number Version TYPE
Location plan Drawing
Block plan Drawing
594GL/23/FP03 Drawing
Flood map for planning Supporting Information
Planning statement Supporting Information
Additional Information
APPEAL GUIDANCE:
Should you (an applicant or agent) feel aggrieved by the decision of the Council to either refuse
permission or to grant permission subject to conditions, you can
1
The proposed crossover will result in vehicles reversing from or into the Classified Road
leading to vehicles stopping or slowing on Green Lanes thus adversely affecting highway safety and
prejudicial to the free flow of traffic, including pedestrians, cyclists using the cycle lane and public
transport, on the Classified Road. In these respects, the proposal would be contrary to the Council's
Technical Footway Guidance 2013, Policy DMD 46 of the Development Management Document 2014,
and Core Strategy 2010 Policies 24 and 30, as well as the aims of the NPPF.
Dated: 1 September 2023
Authorised on behalf of:
Mr A Higham
Head of Development Management
Development Management,
London Borough Enfield,
PO Box 53, Civic Centre,
Silver Street, Enfield,
Middlesex, EN1 3XE
If you have any questions about this decision, please contact the planning officer
kate.vaggers@enfield.gov.uk.
List of plans and documents referred to in this Notice:
Title/Number Version TYPE
Location plan Drawing
Block plan Drawing
594GL/23/FP03 Drawing
Flood map for planning Supporting Information
Planning statement Supporting Information
Additional Information
APPEAL GUIDANCE:
Should you (an applicant or agent) feel aggrieved by the decision of the Council to either refuse
permission or to grant permission subject to conditions, you can
Policies cited
DMD46NPPF
Public response
Measure
Count
Objections
0
In support
0
Total comments
0
Objections
0
In support
0
Total comments
0
People
Who is involved?
Name
Role
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer — delegated decision
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer — delegated decision
Place
What affects it?
Context around the site — not part of this application. Designations over the site: use the map's designations filter (conservation areas, listed buildings, Article 4, flood risk …). Decisions within 250 metres of the site are listed below — context, not this application.
Other applications within 250 metres (context — nearby, not this application)
No other geocoded decision is recorded within 250 metres.