Planning application · Enfield
23/02478/HOU.
127 St Josephs Road London N9 8NX
Householder at 127 St Josephs Road London N9 8NX, received 28 Jul 2023 — refused on 6 Oct 2023 (delegated, Kate Vaggers).
ApprovedRefusedOther
At a glance · this applicationEnfield profile →
Refused
Outcome
6 Oct 2023
10 wks
Decision time
2 wks over the 8-week target
—
Conditions
not captured
21
Documents
21 linked
0
Objections
0 in support
No
Appeal
none recorded
Record from the Enfield planning register as captured; documents link to the council's own files. Nearby applications are context, not part of this application.
Application
What is it?
Construction of hard standing in connection with vehicular access.
Reference
23/02478/HOU
Type
Householder
Applicant
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Postcode
N9 8NX
Ward
Council
Received
28 Jul 2023
Validated
15 Aug 2023
Target date
10 Oct 2023
Decision date
6 Oct 2023
Decision route
Delegated (officer)
Status
Decided
Council register
Reference
23/02478/HOU
Type
Householder
Show all 16 rows
Applicant
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Postcode
N9 8NX
Ward
Council
Received
28 Jul 2023
Validated
15 Aug 2023
Target date
10 Oct 2023
Decision date
6 Oct 2023
Decision route
Delegated (officer)
Status
Decided
Council register
Documents
What was filed?
Document
Published
View
Show all 10 rows
Documents open on the Enfield portal (the portal needs its documents tab opened first — the link handles that). View the application page ↗
Decision
What happened?
Refused on 6 Oct 2023, delegated decision by Kate Vaggers — 10 weeks from submission (2 over the 8-week target).
Timeline
Date
Event
28 Jul 2023
Application received
15 Aug 2023
Application validated
10 Oct 2023
Statutory target date
6 Oct 2023
Delegated decision: Refused · Kate Vaggers
28 Jul 2023
Application received
15 Aug 2023
Application validated
10 Oct 2023
Statutory target date
Show all 4 rows
6 Oct 2023
Delegated decision: Refused · Kate Vaggers
Why it was refused
Reason
As stated on the decision notice
1
The proposed vehicular access would by reason of it's proximity to the existing street tree could
have potential negative impact to health and viability of the existing street tree which would have a
negative aesthetic impact on the character of the street scene causing visual harm, and in this respect
the proposal would therefore be contrary to Core Strategy Policy CP25 and CP30 and Development
Management Document Policies DMD37, DMD46 and DMD80 as well as the Council's Technical
Footway Guidance 2013, and the aims of the NPPF.
Dated: 6 October 2023
Authorised on behalf of:
Karen Page
Head of Planning and Building Control
Housing, Regeneration and Development Department
Enfield Council
PO Box 53, Civic Centre
Silver Street, Enfield
EN1 3XE
If you have any questions about this decision, please contact the planning officer
kate.vaggers@enfield.gov.uk.
List of plans and documents referred to in this Notice:
Title/Number Version TYPE
Location plan Drawing
Block plan Drawing
Existing and proposed 001 Drawing
Reasonable exception statement Supporting Information
Flood map for planning Supporting Information
Additional Information
Planning permission has been refused. However, you are advised that Cadent Gas Ltd own and
operate the gas infrastructure within the area of your development. Prior to carrying out works, please
register on www.linesearchbeforeudig.co.uk to submit details of the planned works for review, ensuring
requirements are adhered to.
Vehicle crossovers require Highway Approval which can only be granted when a crossover and parking
area meets the Council's Technical Footway Guidance 2013. As set out in the crossover team’s
consultation response, due to the proximity of the street tree works would not comply with the Technical
Standards.
APPEAL
Should you (an applicant or agent) feel aggrieved by the decision of the Council to either refuse
permission or to grant permission subject to conditions, you can
1
The proposed vehicular access would by reason of it's proximity to the existing street tree could
have potential negative impact to health and viability of the existing street tree which would have a
negative aesthetic impact on the character of the street scene causing visual harm, and in this respect
the proposal would therefore be contrary to Core Strategy Policy CP25 and CP30 and Development
Management Document Policies DMD37, DMD46 and DMD80 as well as the Council's Technical
Footway Guidance 2013, and the aims of the NPPF.
Dated: 6 October 2023
Authorised on behalf of:
Karen Page
Head of Planning and Building Control
Housing, Regeneration and Development Department
Enfield Council
PO Box 53, Civic Centre
Silver Street, Enfield
EN1 3XE
If you have any questions about this decision, please contact the planning officer
kate.vaggers@enfield.gov.uk.
List of plans and documents referred to in this Notice:
Title/Number Version TYPE
Location plan Drawing
Block plan Drawing
Existing and proposed 001 Drawing
Reasonable exception statement Supporting Information
Flood map for planning Supporting Information
Additional Information
Planning permission has been refused. However, you are advised that Cadent Gas Ltd own and
operate the gas infrastructure within the area of your development. Prior to carrying out works, please
register on www.linesearchbeforeudig.co.uk to submit details of the planned works for review, ensuring
requirements are adhered to.
Vehicle crossovers require Highway Approval which can only be granted when a crossover and parking
area meets the Council's Technical Footway Guidance 2013. As set out in the crossover team’s
consultation response, due to the proximity of the street tree works would not comply with the Technical
Standards.
APPEAL
Should you (an applicant or agent) feel aggrieved by the decision of the Council to either refuse
permission or to grant permission subject to conditions, you can
Policies cited
CP25CP30NPPF
Public response
Measure
Count
Objections
0
In support
0
Total comments
0
Objections
0
In support
0
Total comments
0
People
Who is involved?
Name
Role
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer — delegated decision
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer — delegated decision
Place
What affects it?
Context around the site — not part of this application. Designations over the site: use the map's designations filter (conservation areas, listed buildings, Article 4, flood risk …). Decisions within 250 metres of the site are listed below — context, not this application.
Other applications within 250 metres (context — nearby, not this application)
No other geocoded decision is recorded within 250 metres.