Planning application · Enfield
23/03505/HOU.
66 Raynham Avenue London N18 2BS
Householder at 66 Raynham Avenue London N18 2BS, received 26 Oct 2023 — refused on 10 Jan 2024 (delegated, Mahboubeh Bahrami-Jovein).
ApprovedRefusedOther
At a glance · this applicationEnfield profile →
Refused
Outcome
10 Jan 2024
11 wks
Decision time
3 wks over the 8-week target
—
Conditions
not captured
9
Documents
9 linked
0
Objections
0 in support
Yes
Appeal
Appeal Dismissed
Record from the Enfield planning register as captured; documents link to the council's own files. Nearby applications are context, not part of this application.
Application
What is it?
First floor side and rear extension.
Reference
23/03505/HOU
Type
Householder
Applicant
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Postcode
N18 2BS
Ward
Council
Received
26 Oct 2023
Validated
16 Nov 2023
Target date
11 Jan 2024
Decision date
10 Jan 2024
Decision route
Delegated (officer)
Status
Decided
Council register
Reference
23/03505/HOU
Type
Householder
Show all 16 rows
Applicant
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Postcode
N18 2BS
Ward
Council
Received
26 Oct 2023
Validated
16 Nov 2023
Target date
11 Jan 2024
Decision date
10 Jan 2024
Decision route
Delegated (officer)
Status
Decided
Council register
Documents
What was filed?
Document
Published
View
Show all 9 rows
Documents open on the Enfield portal (the portal needs its documents tab opened first — the link handles that). View the application page ↗
Decision
What happened?
Refused on 10 Jan 2024, delegated decision by Mahboubeh Bahrami-Jovein — 11 weeks from submission (3 over the 8-week target).
Timeline
Date
Event
26 Oct 2023
Application received
16 Nov 2023
Application validated
11 Jan 2024
Statutory target date
10 Jan 2024
Delegated decision: Refused · Mahboubeh Bahrami-Jovein
Appeal
Appeal decided · Appeal Dismissed
26 Oct 2023
Application received
16 Nov 2023
Application validated
11 Jan 2024
Statutory target date
Show all 5 rows
10 Jan 2024
Delegated decision: Refused · Mahboubeh Bahrami-Jovein
Appeal
Appeal decided · Appeal Dismissed
Why it was refused
Reason
As stated on the decision notice
1
The proposed first-floor extension by virtue of its design, scale, siting, and projection would
represent an awkward and incongruous addition which would fail to relate to the surrounding character,
form and pattern of development. Furthermore, the proposals would create an awkward juxtaposition of
roof forms and poor relationship to the original outrigger to the rear elevation, which are highly visible
from the prominent corner junction location, detrimental to the visual amenities of the area. The
proposals are thereby contrary to policies DMD6, DMD8, DMD11 and DMD37 of the Development
Management Document and CP30 of the Core Strategy and D4 of the London Plan.
Dated: 10 January 2024
Authorised on behalf of:
Karen Page
Head of Planning and Building Control
Housing, Regeneration and Development Department
Enfield Council
PO Box 53, Civic Centre
Silver Street, Enfield
EN1 3XE
If you have any questions about this decision, please contact the planning officer mahboubeh.bahrami-
jovein@enfield.gov.uk.
List of plans and documents referred to in this Notice:
Title/Number Version TYPE
EXISTING FLOOR, ROOF, ELEVATION AND SECTION PLANS RA66-02-1001 Drawing
PROPOSED FLOOR, ROOF, ELEVATION AND SECTION RA66-02- Drawing
PLANS 1002B Drawing
SITE LOCATION PLAN
Additional Information
APPEAL
Should you (an applicant or agent) feel aggrieved by the decision of the Council to either refuse
permission or to grant permission subject to conditions, you can
1
The proposed first-floor extension by virtue of its design, scale, siting, and projection would
represent an awkward and incongruous addition which would fail to relate to the surrounding character,
form and pattern of development. Furthermore, the proposals would create an awkward juxtaposition of
roof forms and poor relationship to the original outrigger to the rear elevation, which are highly visible
from the prominent corner junction location, detrimental to the visual amenities of the area. The
proposals are thereby contrary to policies DMD6, DMD8, DMD11 and DMD37 of the Development
Management Document and CP30 of the Core Strategy and D4 of the London Plan.
Dated: 10 January 2024
Authorised on behalf of:
Karen Page
Head of Planning and Building Control
Housing, Regeneration and Development Department
Enfield Council
PO Box 53, Civic Centre
Silver Street, Enfield
EN1 3XE
If you have any questions about this decision, please contact the planning officer mahboubeh.bahrami-
jovein@enfield.gov.uk.
List of plans and documents referred to in this Notice:
Title/Number Version TYPE
EXISTING FLOOR, ROOF, ELEVATION AND SECTION PLANS RA66-02-1001 Drawing
PROPOSED FLOOR, ROOF, ELEVATION AND SECTION RA66-02- Drawing
PLANS 1002B Drawing
SITE LOCATION PLAN
Additional Information
APPEAL
Should you (an applicant or agent) feel aggrieved by the decision of the Council to either refuse
permission or to grant permission subject to conditions, you can
Policies cited
DMD6DMD8DMD11DMD37CP30D4
Appeal
Appeal
Outcome
Appeal decided
Outcome: Appeal Dismissed
Appeal decided
Outcome: Appeal Dismissed
Public response
Measure
Count
Objections
0
In support
0
Total comments
0
Objections
0
In support
0
Total comments
0
People
Who is involved?
Name
Role
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer — delegated decision
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer — delegated decision
Place
What affects it?
Context around the site — not part of this application. Designations over the site: use the map's designations filter (conservation areas, listed buildings, Article 4, flood risk …). Decisions within 250 metres of the site are listed below — context, not this application.
Other applications within 250 metres (context — nearby, not this application)
No other geocoded decision is recorded within 250 metres.