Planning Atlas
Planning Atlas›Enfield›…Cockfosters ward›23/04066/HOU
Planning application · Enfield

23/04066/HOU.

55 De Bohun Avenue London N14 4PU

Householder at 55 De Bohun Avenue London N14 4PU — refused (delegated, Mahboubeh Bahrami-Jovein).

Enfield›Cockfosters›N14 4PU›23/04066/HOU
ApprovedRefusedOther
At a glance · this applicationEnfield profile →
Refused
Outcome
no decision date
—
Decision time
submission → decision
—
Conditions
not captured
21
Documents
21 linked
—
Objections
not captured
No
Appeal
none recorded
Record from the Enfield planning register as captured; documents link to the council's own files. Nearby applications are context, not part of this application.
Application

What is it?

The council record carries no proposal text.

Reference
23/04066/HOU
Type
Householder
Site
Applicant
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Postcode
N14 4PU
Ward
Council
Received
—
Decision date
—
Decision route
Delegated (officer)
Status
Decided
Council register
Reference
23/04066/HOU
Type
Householder
Site
Show all 14 rows
Applicant
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Postcode
N14 4PU
Ward
Council
Received
—
Decision date
—
Decision route
Delegated (officer)
Status
Decided
Council register
Documents

What was filed?

Document
Published
View
Report
16 Feb 2024
Decision Notice
8 Feb 2024
Application form redacted
15 Dec 2023
existing rear and side eleations
15 Dec 2023
The location plan
12 Dec 2023
Site Location GeoJson
12 Dec 2023
Block plan of the site
12 Dec 2023
LOCATION PLAN
12 Dec 2023
PROPOSED GROUND FLOOR PLAN
12 Dec 2023
PROPOSED FIRST FLOOR PLAN
12 Dec 2023
Report
16 Feb 2024
Decision Notice
8 Feb 2024
Application form redacted
15 Dec 2023
Show all 10 rows
existing rear and side eleations
15 Dec 2023
The location plan
12 Dec 2023
Site Location GeoJson
12 Dec 2023
Block plan of the site
12 Dec 2023
LOCATION PLAN
12 Dec 2023
PROPOSED GROUND FLOOR PLAN
12 Dec 2023
PROPOSED FIRST FLOOR PLAN
12 Dec 2023

Documents open on the Enfield portal (the portal needs its documents tab opened first — the link handles that). View the application page ↗

Decision

What happened?

Refused, delegated decision by Mahboubeh Bahrami-Jovein.

Timeline

No dated events are recorded.

Why it was refused

Reason
As stated on the decision notice
1
The proposals, by virtue of their design, excessive size, scale and siting would give rise to a contrived, dominant and bulky form of development that would be detrimental to the visual amenities of De Bohun Avenue and result in demonstrable harm to the character and appearance of the application dwelling and the area,. In particular, the proposed rear dormer would fail to meet the required insets and sit comfortably within the roofslope to represent a bulky and dominant addition, and coupled with the increased ridge height would appear as an excessive and incongruous roof alteration. Additionally, the excessive projection to the two storey front gable would be dominant and visually intrusive within the street scene thereby both unbalancing and detracting from the established character, including building line and symmetry of the prevailing built form within the street scene. The proposals are thereby contrary to Policies D1, D3, D6 and D8 of the London Plan (2021), CP30 of the Core Strategy (2010), DMD6, DMD8, DMD11, DMD13 and DMD37 of the Development Management Document (2014) and the advice contained within the NPPF (2021 Dated: 8 February 2024 Authorised on behalf of: Karen Page Head of Planning and Building Control Housing, Regeneration and Development Department Enfield Council PO Box 53, Civic Centre Silver Street, Enfield EN1 3XE If you have any questions about this decision, please contact the planning officer mahboubeh.bahrami- jovein@enfield.gov.uk. List of plans and documents referred to in this Notice: Title/Number Version TYPE ELEVATION (FRONT & RIGHT) - EXISTING 410 Drawing ELEVATION (FRONT & RIGHT) - PROPOSED 400-PA03 Drawing ELEVATION (REAR) - PROPOSED 401-PA03 Drawing ELEVATION (REAR) - PROPOSED 401 Drawing EXISTING FIRST FLOOR PLAN 211 Drawing EXISTING GROUND FLOOR PLAN 210 Drawing EXISTING ROOF PLAN 212 Drawing PROPOSED FIRST FLOOR PLAN 201-PA03 Drawing PROPOSED GROUND FLOOR PLAN 200-PA03 Drawing PROPOSED LOFT PLAN 203-PA03 Drawing PROPOSED ROOF PLAN 202-PA03 Drawing SECTION - EXISTING & PROPOSED 300-PA03 Drawing Existing Rear and Side Elevations 411 Drawing Site Location plan Drawing Additional Information APPEAL Should you (an applicant or agent) feel aggrieved by the decision of the Council to either refuse permission or to grant permission subject to conditions, you can
1
The proposals, by virtue of their design, excessive size, scale and siting would give rise to a contrived, dominant and bulky form of development that would be detrimental to the visual amenities of De Bohun Avenue and result in demonstrable harm to the character and appearance of the application dwelling and the area,. In particular, the proposed rear dormer would fail to meet the required insets and sit comfortably within the roofslope to represent a bulky and dominant addition, and coupled with the increased ridge height would appear as an excessive and incongruous roof alteration. Additionally, the excessive projection to the two storey front gable would be dominant and visually intrusive within the street scene thereby both unbalancing and detracting from the established character, including building line and symmetry of the prevailing built form within the street scene. The proposals are thereby contrary to Policies D1, D3, D6 and D8 of the London Plan (2021), CP30 of the Core Strategy (2010), DMD6, DMD8, DMD11, DMD13 and DMD37 of the Development Management Document (2014) and the advice contained within the NPPF (2021 Dated: 8 February 2024 Authorised on behalf of: Karen Page Head of Planning and Building Control Housing, Regeneration and Development Department Enfield Council PO Box 53, Civic Centre Silver Street, Enfield EN1 3XE If you have any questions about this decision, please contact the planning officer mahboubeh.bahrami- jovein@enfield.gov.uk. List of plans and documents referred to in this Notice: Title/Number Version TYPE ELEVATION (FRONT & RIGHT) - EXISTING 410 Drawing ELEVATION (FRONT & RIGHT) - PROPOSED 400-PA03 Drawing ELEVATION (REAR) - PROPOSED 401-PA03 Drawing ELEVATION (REAR) - PROPOSED 401 Drawing EXISTING FIRST FLOOR PLAN 211 Drawing EXISTING GROUND FLOOR PLAN 210 Drawing EXISTING ROOF PLAN 212 Drawing PROPOSED FIRST FLOOR PLAN 201-PA03 Drawing PROPOSED GROUND FLOOR PLAN 200-PA03 Drawing PROPOSED LOFT PLAN 203-PA03 Drawing PROPOSED ROOF PLAN 202-PA03 Drawing SECTION - EXISTING & PROPOSED 300-PA03 Drawing Existing Rear and Side Elevations 411 Drawing Site Location plan Drawing Additional Information APPEAL Should you (an applicant or agent) feel aggrieved by the decision of the Council to either refuse permission or to grant permission subject to conditions, you can
Policies cited
D1D3D6D8CP30DMD6DMD8DMD11DMD13DMD37NPPF

Public response

Comment counts were not captured for this application.

People

Who is involved?

Name
Role
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer — delegated decision
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer — delegated decision
Place

What affects it?

Context around the site — not part of this application. Designations over the site: use the map's designations filter (conservation areas, listed buildings, Article 4, flood risk …). Decisions within 250 metres of the site are listed below — context, not this application.

Other applications within 250 metres (context — nearby, not this application)

No other geocoded decision is recorded within 250 metres.