Planning Atlas
Planning AtlasEnfieldArnos Grove ward23/04178/HOU
Planning application · Enfield

23/04178/HOU.

20 Brycedale Crescent London N14 7EY

Householder at 20 Brycedale Crescent London N14 7EY, received 27 Dec 2023 — refused on 1 Mar 2024 (delegated, Kate Vaggers).

EnfieldArnos GroveN14 7EY23/04178/HOU
ApprovedRefusedOther
At a glance · this applicationEnfield profile →
Refused
Outcome
1 Mar 2024
9 wks
Decision time
1 wks over the 8-week target
Conditions
not captured
35
Documents
35 linked
0
Objections
0 in support
No
Appeal
none recorded
Record from the Enfield planning register as captured; documents link to the council's own files. Nearby applications are context, not part of this application.
Application

What is it?

Extension to roof at side to form gable end, rear dormer and 1x roof light.

Reference
23/04178/HOU
Type
Householder
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Postcode
N14 7EY
Council
Received
27 Dec 2023
Validated
8 Jan 2024
Target date
4 Mar 2024
Decision date
1 Mar 2024
Decision route
Delegated (officer)
Status
Decided
Reference
23/04178/HOU
Type
Householder
Show all 16 rows
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Postcode
N14 7EY
Council
Received
27 Dec 2023
Validated
8 Jan 2024
Target date
4 Mar 2024
Decision date
1 Mar 2024
Decision route
Delegated (officer)
Status
Decided
Documents

What was filed?

Document
Published
View
Officer Report
6 Mar 2024
Decision Notice
1 Mar 2024
Officer report
1 Mar 2024
PROPOSED SIDE ELEVATION
8 Jan 2024
PROPOSED FRONT ELEVATION
8 Jan 2024
RENDERED FRONT ELEVATION
8 Jan 2024
RENDERED SIDE ELEVATION
8 Jan 2024
Existing Section A
8 Jan 2024
Existing Section B
8 Jan 2024
Proposed Section B
8 Jan 2024
Officer Report
6 Mar 2024
Decision Notice
1 Mar 2024
Officer report
1 Mar 2024
Show all 10 rows
PROPOSED SIDE ELEVATION
8 Jan 2024
PROPOSED FRONT ELEVATION
8 Jan 2024
RENDERED FRONT ELEVATION
8 Jan 2024
RENDERED SIDE ELEVATION
8 Jan 2024
Existing Section A
8 Jan 2024
Existing Section B
8 Jan 2024
Proposed Section B
8 Jan 2024

Documents open on the Enfield portal (the portal needs its documents tab opened first — the link handles that). View the application page ↗

Decision

What happened?

Refused on 1 Mar 2024, delegated decision by Kate Vaggers — 9 weeks from submission (1 over the 8-week target).

Timeline

Date
Event
27 Dec 2023
Application received
8 Jan 2024
Application validated
4 Mar 2024
Statutory target date
1 Mar 2024
Delegated decision: Refused · Kate Vaggers
27 Dec 2023
Application received
8 Jan 2024
Application validated
4 Mar 2024
Statutory target date
Show all 4 rows
1 Mar 2024
Delegated decision: Refused · Kate Vaggers

Why it was refused

Reason
As stated on the decision notice
1
The proposed roof extensions by reason of size, siting and design would represent an overly dominant, incongruous, and visually intrusive form of development, out of keeping and character with, and detrimental to, the appearance and character of the property and surrounding area. This would be contrary to Core Strategy (2010) Policies CP30, Development Management Document (2014) Polices DMD13 and DMD37, London Plan (2021) Policy D4 and National Planning Policy Framework (2023). Dated: 1 March 2024 Authorised on behalf of: Karen Page Head of Planning and Building Control Housing, Regeneration and Development Department Enfield Council PO Box 53, Civic Centre Silver Street, Enfield EN1 3XE If you have any questions about this decision, please contact the planning officer kate.vaggers@enfield.gov.uk. List of plans and documents referred to in this Notice: Title/Number Version TYPE Location Plan Drawing 281_3_000 Drawing 281_3_001 Drawing 281_3_002 Drawing 281_3_100 Drawing 281_3_105 Drawing 281_3_130 Drawing 281_3_131 Drawing 281_3_200 Drawing 281_3_205 Drawing 281_3_210 Drawing 281_3_215 Drawing 281_3_330 Drawing 281_3_331 Drawing 281_3_350 Drawing 281_3_351 Drawing 281_3_352 Drawing 281_3_900 Drawing 281_3_901 Drawing APPEAL Should you (an applicant or agent) feel aggrieved by the decision of the Council to either refuse permission or to grant permission subject to conditions, you can
1
The proposed roof extensions by reason of size, siting and design would represent an overly dominant, incongruous, and visually intrusive form of development, out of keeping and character with, and detrimental to, the appearance and character of the property and surrounding area. This would be contrary to Core Strategy (2010) Policies CP30, Development Management Document (2014) Polices DMD13 and DMD37, London Plan (2021) Policy D4 and National Planning Policy Framework (2023). Dated: 1 March 2024 Authorised on behalf of: Karen Page Head of Planning and Building Control Housing, Regeneration and Development Department Enfield Council PO Box 53, Civic Centre Silver Street, Enfield EN1 3XE If you have any questions about this decision, please contact the planning officer kate.vaggers@enfield.gov.uk. List of plans and documents referred to in this Notice: Title/Number Version TYPE Location Plan Drawing 281_3_000 Drawing 281_3_001 Drawing 281_3_002 Drawing 281_3_100 Drawing 281_3_105 Drawing 281_3_130 Drawing 281_3_131 Drawing 281_3_200 Drawing 281_3_205 Drawing 281_3_210 Drawing 281_3_215 Drawing 281_3_330 Drawing 281_3_331 Drawing 281_3_350 Drawing 281_3_351 Drawing 281_3_352 Drawing 281_3_900 Drawing 281_3_901 Drawing APPEAL Should you (an applicant or agent) feel aggrieved by the decision of the Council to either refuse permission or to grant permission subject to conditions, you can
Policies cited
CP30D4NPPF

Public response

Measure
Count
Objections
0
In support
0
Total comments
0
Objections
0
In support
0
Total comments
0
People

Who is involved?

Name
Role
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer — delegated decision
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer — delegated decision
Place

What affects it?

Context around the site — not part of this application. Designations over the site: use the map's designations filter (conservation areas, listed buildings, Article 4, flood risk …). Decisions within 250 metres of the site are listed below — context, not this application.

Other applications within 250 metres (context — nearby, not this application)

No other geocoded decision is recorded within 250 metres.