Planning application · Enfield
24/00254/HOU.
43 Turkey Street Enfield EN3 5TT
Householder at 43 Turkey Street Enfield EN3 5TT, received 29 Jan 2024 — refused on 10 Apr 2024 (delegated, Samuel Wong).
ApprovedRefusedOther
At a glance · this applicationEnfield profile →
Refused
Outcome
10 Apr 2024
10 wks
Decision time
2 wks over the 8-week target
—
Conditions
not captured
26
Documents
26 linked
0
Objections
0 in support
Yes
Appeal
Appeal Allowed Subject to Conditions
Record from the Enfield planning register as captured; documents link to the council's own files. Nearby applications are context, not part of this application.
Application
What is it?
Single storey rear extension, installation of 2 x windows to flank wall elevation, new door to rear on ground floor level and retaining wall to the rear of the house, demolition of toilet block, alterations to the gate entrance to the east of the site
Reference
24/00254/HOU
Type
Householder
Applicant
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Postcode
Ward
Council
Received
29 Jan 2024
Validated
14 Feb 2024
Target date
10 Apr 2024
Decision date
10 Apr 2024
Decision route
Delegated (officer)
Status
Decided
Premises record
Council register
Reference
24/00254/HOU
Type
Householder
Show all 17 rows
Applicant
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Postcode
Ward
Council
Received
29 Jan 2024
Validated
14 Feb 2024
Target date
10 Apr 2024
Decision date
10 Apr 2024
Decision route
Delegated (officer)
Status
Decided
Premises record
Council register
Documents
What was filed?
Document
Published
View
Show all 10 rows
Documents open on the Enfield portal (the portal needs its documents tab opened first — the link handles that). View the application page ↗
Decision
What happened?
Refused on 10 Apr 2024, delegated decision by Samuel Wong — 10 weeks from submission (2 over the 8-week target).
Timeline
Date
Event
29 Jan 2024
Application received
14 Feb 2024
Application validated
10 Apr 2024
Statutory target date
10 Apr 2024
Delegated decision: Refused · Samuel Wong
Appeal
Appeal decided · Appeal Allowed Subject to Conditions
29 Jan 2024
Application received
14 Feb 2024
Application validated
10 Apr 2024
Statutory target date
Show all 5 rows
10 Apr 2024
Delegated decision: Refused · Samuel Wong
Appeal
Appeal decided · Appeal Allowed Subject to Conditions
Why it was refused
Reason
As stated on the decision notice
1
REFUSED for the following reason:
The proposed rear extension, flank windows, and rear door, by virtue of their design, materiality and
positioning, would form an incongruous addition to the existing property and would cause adverse harm
to the special character and appearance of the locally listed building and the Conservation Area, and
would provide negligible public benefit. Therefore, the proposal is contrary to Policies D3, D4, and HC1
of the London Plan (2021), to Policies CP30 and CP31 of the Enfield Core Strategy (2010), to Policies
DMD6, DMD37 and DMD44 of the Enfield Development Management Document (2014), and it fails to
accord with Section 16 of the National Planning Policy Framework (2023).
Dated: 10 April 2024
Authorised on behalf of:
Karen Page
Head of Planning and Building Control
Housing, Regeneration and Development Department
Enfield Council
PO Box 53, Civic Centre
Silver Street, Enfield
EN1 3XE
If you have any questions about this decision, please contact the planning officer
samuel.wong@enfield.gov.uk.
List of plans and documents referred to in this Notice:
Title/Number Version TYPE
Flood Zone 3 Assessment
Design and Access Statement
Heritage Statement
Arboricultural Report and Impact Assessment dated 5/12/2023
Site location plan
03 Rev B
04 Rev B
05
06
07 Rev A
08 Rev B
09 Rev A
13 Rev A
23476-23-01
23476-23-03
26476-23-03
WELL/FHH/01
Additional Information
APPEAL
Should you (an applicant or agent) feel aggrieved by the decision of the Council to either refuse
permission or to grant permission subject to conditions, you can
1
REFUSED for the following reason:
The proposed rear extension, flank windows, and rear door, by virtue of their design, materiality and
positioning, would form an incongruous addition to the existing property and would cause adverse harm
to the special character and appearance of the locally listed building and the Conservation Area, and
would provide negligible public benefit. Therefore, the proposal is contrary to Policies D3, D4, and HC1
of the London Plan (2021), to Policies CP30 and CP31 of the Enfield Core Strategy (2010), to Policies
DMD6, DMD37 and DMD44 of the Enfield Development Management Document (2014), and it fails to
accord with Section 16 of the National Planning Policy Framework (2023).
Dated: 10 April 2024
Authorised on behalf of:
Karen Page
Head of Planning and Building Control
Housing, Regeneration and Development Department
Enfield Council
PO Box 53, Civic Centre
Silver Street, Enfield
EN1 3XE
If you have any questions about this decision, please contact the planning officer
samuel.wong@enfield.gov.uk.
List of plans and documents referred to in this Notice:
Title/Number Version TYPE
Flood Zone 3 Assessment
Design and Access Statement
Heritage Statement
Arboricultural Report and Impact Assessment dated 5/12/2023
Site location plan
03 Rev B
04 Rev B
05
06
07 Rev A
08 Rev B
09 Rev A
13 Rev A
23476-23-01
23476-23-03
26476-23-03
WELL/FHH/01
Additional Information
APPEAL
Should you (an applicant or agent) feel aggrieved by the decision of the Council to either refuse
permission or to grant permission subject to conditions, you can
Policies cited
HC1CP30CP31DMD6DMD37DMD44National Planning Policy Framework 16NPPF
Appeal
Appeal
Outcome
Appeal decided
Outcome: Appeal Allowed Subject to Conditions
Appeal decided
Outcome: Appeal Allowed Subject to Conditions
Public response
Measure
Count
Objections
0
In support
0
Total comments
0
Objections
0
In support
0
Total comments
0
People
Who is involved?
Name
Role
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer — delegated decision
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer — delegated decision
Place
What affects it?
Context around the site — not part of this application. Designations over the site: use the map's designations filter (conservation areas, listed buildings, Article 4, flood risk …). Decisions within 250 metres of the site are listed below — context, not this application.
Other applications within 250 metres (context — nearby, not this application)
No other geocoded decision is recorded within 250 metres.