Planning application · Enfield
24/00260/HOU.
11 The Vineries Enfield EN1 3DQ
Householder at 11 The Vineries Enfield EN1 3DQ, received 29 Jan 2024 — refused on 8 Mar 2024 (delegated, Jeremiah Ayerh).
ApprovedRefusedOther
At a glance · this applicationEnfield profile →
Refused
Outcome
8 Mar 2024
6 wks
Decision time
inside the 8-week target
—
Conditions
not captured
10
Documents
10 linked
0
Objections
0 in support
No
Appeal
none recorded
Record from the Enfield planning register as captured; documents link to the council's own files. Nearby applications are context, not part of this application.
Application
What is it?
Part single storey, part two storey side to rear extension.
Reference
24/00260/HOU
Type
Householder
Applicant
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Postcode
Ward
Council
Received
29 Jan 2024
Target date
25 Mar 2024
Decision date
8 Mar 2024
Decision route
Delegated (officer)
Status
Decided
Premises record
Council register
Reference
24/00260/HOU
Type
Householder
Show all 16 rows
Applicant
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Postcode
Ward
Council
Received
29 Jan 2024
Target date
25 Mar 2024
Decision date
8 Mar 2024
Decision route
Delegated (officer)
Status
Decided
Premises record
Council register
Documents
What was filed?
Document
Published
View
Show all 10 rows
Documents open on the Enfield portal (the portal needs its documents tab opened first — the link handles that). View the application page ↗
Decision
What happened?
Refused on 8 Mar 2024, delegated decision by Jeremiah Ayerh — 6 weeks from submission.
Timeline
Date
Event
29 Jan 2024
Application received
25 Mar 2024
Statutory target date
8 Mar 2024
Delegated decision: Refused · Jeremiah Ayerh
29 Jan 2024
Application received
25 Mar 2024
Statutory target date
8 Mar 2024
Delegated decision: Refused · Jeremiah Ayerh
Why it was refused
Reason
As stated on the decision notice
1
The proposed two storey side extension, by reason of its flat roof design, would appear out of
keeping with the host property, visually intrusive and would have a detrimental impact on the character
of the immediate area. The proposal is therefore contrary to Policy D3 of the London Plan (2021), Policy
CP30 of the Enfield Core Strategy (2010), and Policies DMD13, DMD14 and DMD37 of the Enfield
Development Management Document (2014).
Dated: 8 March 2024
Authorised on behalf of:
Karen Page
Head of Planning and Building Control
Housing, Regeneration and Development Department
Enfield Council
PO Box 53, Civic Centre
Silver Street, Enfield
EN1 3XE
If you have any questions about this decision, please contact the planning officer
Jeremiah.ayerh@enfield.gov.uk.
List of plans and documents referred to in this Notice:
Title/Number Version TYPE
location plan Drawing
A100 Drawing
A101 Drawing
A102 Drawing
A103 Rev A Drawing
A104 Rev A Drawing
A105 Rev A Drawing
A106 Rev A Drawing
A107 Rev A Drawing
A108 Rev A Drawing
A109 Drawing
A110 Drawing
APPEAL
Should you (an applicant or agent) feel aggrieved by the decision of the Council to either refuse
permission or to grant permission subject to conditions, you can
1
The proposed two storey side extension, by reason of its flat roof design, would appear out of
keeping with the host property, visually intrusive and would have a detrimental impact on the character
of the immediate area. The proposal is therefore contrary to Policy D3 of the London Plan (2021), Policy
CP30 of the Enfield Core Strategy (2010), and Policies DMD13, DMD14 and DMD37 of the Enfield
Development Management Document (2014).
Dated: 8 March 2024
Authorised on behalf of:
Karen Page
Head of Planning and Building Control
Housing, Regeneration and Development Department
Enfield Council
PO Box 53, Civic Centre
Silver Street, Enfield
EN1 3XE
If you have any questions about this decision, please contact the planning officer
Jeremiah.ayerh@enfield.gov.uk.
List of plans and documents referred to in this Notice:
Title/Number Version TYPE
location plan Drawing
A100 Drawing
A101 Drawing
A102 Drawing
A103 Rev A Drawing
A104 Rev A Drawing
A105 Rev A Drawing
A106 Rev A Drawing
A107 Rev A Drawing
A108 Rev A Drawing
A109 Drawing
A110 Drawing
APPEAL
Should you (an applicant or agent) feel aggrieved by the decision of the Council to either refuse
permission or to grant permission subject to conditions, you can
Policies cited
D3CP30DMD13DMD14DMD37
Public response
Measure
Count
Objections
0
In support
0
Total comments
0
Objections
0
In support
0
Total comments
0
People
Who is involved?
Name
Role
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer — delegated decision
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer — delegated decision
Place
What affects it?
Context around the site — not part of this application. Designations over the site: use the map's designations filter (conservation areas, listed buildings, Article 4, flood risk …). Decisions within 250 metres of the site are listed below — context, not this application.
Other applications within 250 metres (context — nearby, not this application)
No other geocoded decision is recorded within 250 metres.