Planning application · Enfield
24/00303/FUL.
225A Ordnance Road Enfield EN3 6AA
Full / Other Planning at 225A Ordnance Road Enfield EN3 6AA, received 1 Feb 2024 — refused on 26 Mar 2024 (delegated, Jeremiah Ayerh).
ApprovedRefusedOther
At a glance · this applicationEnfield profile →
Refused
Outcome
26 Mar 2024
8 wks
Decision time
inside the 8-week target
—
Conditions
not captured
4
Documents
4 linked
0
Objections
0 in support
No
Appeal
none recorded
Record from the Enfield planning register as captured; documents link to the council's own files. Nearby applications are context, not part of this application.
Application
What is it?
First floor rear extension with side and rear rooflights.
Reference
24/00303/FUL
Type
Full
Applicant
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Postcode
EN3 6AA
Ward
Council
Received
1 Feb 2024
Validated
13 Feb 2024
Target date
9 Apr 2024
Decision date
26 Mar 2024
Decision route
Delegated (officer)
Status
Decided
Council register
Reference
24/00303/FUL
Type
Full
Show all 16 rows
Applicant
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Postcode
EN3 6AA
Ward
Council
Received
1 Feb 2024
Validated
13 Feb 2024
Target date
9 Apr 2024
Decision date
26 Mar 2024
Decision route
Delegated (officer)
Status
Decided
Council register
Documents
What was filed?
Document
Published
View
Documents open on the Enfield portal (the portal needs its documents tab opened first — the link handles that). View the application page ↗
Decision
What happened?
Refused on 26 Mar 2024, delegated decision by Jeremiah Ayerh — 8 weeks from submission.
Timeline
Date
Event
1 Feb 2024
Application received
13 Feb 2024
Application validated
9 Apr 2024
Statutory target date
26 Mar 2024
Delegated decision: Refused · Jeremiah Ayerh
1 Feb 2024
Application received
13 Feb 2024
Application validated
9 Apr 2024
Statutory target date
Show all 4 rows
26 Mar 2024
Delegated decision: Refused · Jeremiah Ayerh
Why it was refused
Reason
As stated on the decision notice
1
The proposed first floor rear extension, by virtue of its depth, width, detailed design, form and
bulk, when viewed in conjunction with the existing rear roof dormer would appear visually intrusive,
incongruous, overly dominant and out of keeping with the character and appearance of the host
building and the surrounding area of which it forms part. The proposal is therefore contrary to Section
12 of the National Planning Policy Framework (2023), Policies D3 and D4 of the London Plan (2021),
CP30 of the Enfield Core Strategy (2010), DMD6, DMD8, DMD11, DMD13 and DMD37 of the Enfield
Development Management Document (2014).
2
The proposed first floor rear extension, by virtue of its height, depth, form and proximity to the
site boundary would give rise to an unneighbourly loss of sunlight, daylight and outlook, and a
perceived loss of privacy, for the occupiers of the neighbouring property at No. 223 Ordnance Road.
The proposal is therefore contrary to Section 12 of the National Planning Policy Framework (2023),
Policies D3 and D4 of the London Plan (2021), CP4 and CP30 of the Enfield Core Strategy (2010),
DMD6, DMD8, DMD11 and DMD37 of the Enfield Development Management Document (2014) and
the London Housing Supplementary Planning Guidance (2016).
3
The proposed development, by virtue of its insufficient provision of private/communal amenity
space for the proposed dwelling, would result in substandard and inappropriate accommodation
incapable of meeting the reasonable needs of occupiers. The proposal is therefore contrary to Section
12 of the National Planning Policy Framework (2023), Policies D3 and D4 of the London Plan (2021),
CP30 of the Enfield Core Strategy (2010), DMD6, DMD8, DMD9 and DMD37 of the Enfield
Development Management Document (2014) and the London Housing Supplementary Planning
Guidance (2016).
Dated: 26 March 2024
Authorised on behalf of:
Karen Page
Head of Planning and Building Control
Housing, Regeneration and Development Department
Enfield Council
PO Box 53, Civic Centre
Silver Street, Enfield
EN1 3XE
If you have any questions about this decision, please contact the planning officer
Jeremiah.ayerh@enfield.gov.uk.
List of plans and documents referred to in this Notice:
Title/Number Version TYPE
gla-1L Rev B Drawing
gla-2L Rev B Drawing
gla-3L Rev B Drawing
gla-4L Rev B Drawing
gla-7L Rev B Drawing
gla-6L Rev B Drawing
gla-5L Rev B Drawing
APPEAL GUIDANCE:
Should you (an applicant or agent) feel aggrieved by the decision of the Council to either refuse
permission or to grant permission subject to conditions, you can
1
The proposed first floor rear extension, by virtue of its depth, width, detailed design, form and
bulk, when viewed in conjunction with the existing rear roof dormer would appear visually intrusive,
incongruous, overly dominant and out of keeping with the character and appearance of the host
building and the surrounding area of which it forms part. The proposal is therefore contrary to Section
12 of the National Planning Policy Framework (2023), Policies D3 and D4 of the London Plan (2021),
CP30 of the Enfield Core Strategy (2010), DMD6, DMD8, DMD11, DMD13 and DMD37 of the Enfield
Development Management Document (2014).
2
The proposed first floor rear extension, by virtue of its height, depth, form and proximity to the
site boundary would give rise to an unneighbourly loss of sunlight, daylight and outlook, and a
perceived loss of privacy, for the occupiers of the neighbouring property at No. 223 Ordnance Road.
The proposal is therefore contrary to Section 12 of the National Planning Policy Framework (2023),
Policies D3 and D4 of the London Plan (2021), CP4 and CP30 of the Enfield Core Strategy (2010),
DMD6, DMD8, DMD11 and DMD37 of the Enfield Development Management Document (2014) and
the London Housing Supplementary Planning Guidance (2016).
3
The proposed development, by virtue of its insufficient provision of private/communal amenity
space for the proposed dwelling, would result in substandard and inappropriate accommodation
incapable of meeting the reasonable needs of occupiers. The proposal is therefore contrary to Section
12 of the National Planning Policy Framework (2023), Policies D3 and D4 of the London Plan (2021),
CP30 of the Enfield Core Strategy (2010), DMD6, DMD8, DMD9 and DMD37 of the Enfield
Development Management Document (2014) and the London Housing Supplementary Planning
Guidance (2016).
Dated: 26 March 2024
Authorised on behalf of:
Karen Page
Head of Planning and Building Control
Housing, Regeneration and Development Department
Enfield Council
PO Box 53, Civic Centre
Silver Street, Enfield
EN1 3XE
If you have any questions about this decision, please contact the planning officer
Jeremiah.ayerh@enfield.gov.uk.
List of plans and documents referred to in this Notice:
Title/Number Version TYPE
gla-1L Rev B Drawing
gla-2L Rev B Drawing
gla-3L Rev B Drawing
gla-4L Rev B Drawing
gla-7L Rev B Drawing
gla-6L Rev B Drawing
gla-5L Rev B Drawing
APPEAL GUIDANCE:
Should you (an applicant or agent) feel aggrieved by the decision of the Council to either refuse
permission or to grant permission subject to conditions, you can
Policies cited
National Planning Policy Framework 12D3D4CP30DMD6DMD8DMD11DMD13DMD37NPPFCP4DMD9
Public response
Measure
Count
Objections
0
In support
0
Total comments
0
Objections
0
In support
0
Total comments
0
People
Who is involved?
Name
Role
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer — delegated decision
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer — delegated decision
Place
What affects it?
Context around the site — not part of this application. Designations over the site: use the map's designations filter (conservation areas, listed buildings, Article 4, flood risk …). Decisions within 250 metres of the site are listed below — context, not this application.
Other applications within 250 metres (context — nearby, not this application)
No other geocoded decision is recorded within 250 metres.