Planning application · Enfield
24/00570/HOU.
Householder at 197 Bury Street London N9 9JE, received 22 Feb 2024 — refused on 4 Jun 2025 by committee.
ApprovedRefusedOther
At a glance · this applicationEnfield profile →
Refused
Outcome
4 Jun 2025
67 wks
Decision time
59 wks over the 8-week target
—
Conditions
not captured
9
Documents
9 linked
0
Objections
0 in support
Yes
Appeal
Appeal Dismissed
Record from the Enfield planning register as captured; documents link to the council's own files. Nearby applications are context, not part of this application.
Application
What is it?
Vehicular access and associated hardstanding.
Reference
24/00570/HOU
Type
Householder
Applicant
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Postcode
N9 9JE
Ward
Council
Received
22 Feb 2024
Validated
28 Feb 2024
Target date
24 Apr 2024
Decision date
4 Jun 2025
Decision route
Planning committee
Status
Decided
Council register
Reference
24/00570/HOU
Type
Householder
Show all 16 rows
Applicant
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Postcode
N9 9JE
Ward
Council
Received
22 Feb 2024
Validated
28 Feb 2024
Target date
24 Apr 2024
Decision date
4 Jun 2025
Decision route
Planning committee
Status
Decided
Council register
Documents
What was filed?
Document
Published
View
Documents open on the Enfield portal (the portal needs its documents tab opened first — the link handles that). View the application page ↗
Decision
What happened?
Refused on 4 Jun 2025, determined by the planning committee — 67 weeks from submission (59 over the 8-week target).
Timeline
Date
Event
22 Feb 2024
Application received
28 Feb 2024
Application validated
24 Apr 2024
Statutory target date
4 Jun 2025
Committee decision: Refused
Appeal
Appeal decided · Appeal Dismissed
22 Feb 2024
Application received
28 Feb 2024
Application validated
24 Apr 2024
Statutory target date
Show all 5 rows
4 Jun 2025
Committee decision: Refused
Appeal
Appeal decided · Appeal Dismissed
Why it was refused
Reason
As stated on the decision notice
1
The proposed crossover will result in the intensity of vehicle movements, vehicles reversing from
or into the Classified Road leading to vehicles stopping, slowing and turning from or onto Bury Street
prejudicial to the free flow of traffic on the classified road and to the detriment of road safety, including
pedestrians and public transport, as well as resulting in a loss of on-street car parking in an area of high
demand. Therefore, the proposal would be contrary to, London Plan Policies LP Policies T1, T2 and T6,
Core Strategy (2010) Policies CP24 and CP30, Policy DMD 46 of the Development Management
Document (2014), the Council's Technical Footway Guidance (2013) as well as the aims of the NPPF
(2024) which seeks to create places that are safe and minimise the scope for conflicts between
pedestrians, cyclists and vehicles.
Dated: 4 June 2025
Authorised on behalf of:
Karen Page
Head of Planning and Building Control
Housing, Regeneration and Development Department
Enfield Council
PO Box 53, Civic Centre
Silver Street, Enfield
EN1 3XE
If you have any questions about this decision, please contact the planning officer
jennie.rebairo@enfield.gov.uk.
List of plans and documents referred to in this Notice:
Title/Number Version TYPE
Location Plan Drawing
Block Plan PL02 A Drawing
PL01 A Drawing
PL03 A Drawing
Additional Information
APPEAL
Should you (an applicant or agent) feel aggrieved by the decision of the Council to either refuse
permission or to grant permission subject to conditions, you can
1
The proposed crossover will result in the intensity of vehicle movements, vehicles reversing from
or into the Classified Road leading to vehicles stopping, slowing and turning from or onto Bury Street
prejudicial to the free flow of traffic on the classified road and to the detriment of road safety, including
pedestrians and public transport, as well as resulting in a loss of on-street car parking in an area of high
demand. Therefore, the proposal would be contrary to, London Plan Policies LP Policies T1, T2 and T6,
Core Strategy (2010) Policies CP24 and CP30, Policy DMD 46 of the Development Management
Document (2014), the Council's Technical Footway Guidance (2013) as well as the aims of the NPPF
(2024) which seeks to create places that are safe and minimise the scope for conflicts between
pedestrians, cyclists and vehicles.
Dated: 4 June 2025
Authorised on behalf of:
Karen Page
Head of Planning and Building Control
Housing, Regeneration and Development Department
Enfield Council
PO Box 53, Civic Centre
Silver Street, Enfield
EN1 3XE
If you have any questions about this decision, please contact the planning officer
jennie.rebairo@enfield.gov.uk.
List of plans and documents referred to in this Notice:
Title/Number Version TYPE
Location Plan Drawing
Block Plan PL02 A Drawing
PL01 A Drawing
PL03 A Drawing
Additional Information
APPEAL
Should you (an applicant or agent) feel aggrieved by the decision of the Council to either refuse
permission or to grant permission subject to conditions, you can
Policies cited
DMD46CP24CP30NPPF
Appeal
Appeal
Outcome
Appeal decided
Outcome: Appeal Dismissed
Appeal decided
Outcome: Appeal Dismissed
Public response
Measure
Count
Objections
0
In support
0
Total comments
0
Objections
0
In support
0
Total comments
0
People
Who is involved?
Name
Role
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer (report to committee)
Determined at committee
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer (report to committee)
Show all 4 rows
Determined at committee
Place
What affects it?
Context around the site — not part of this application. Designations over the site: use the map's designations filter (conservation areas, listed buildings, Article 4, flood risk …). Decisions within 250 metres of the site are listed below — context, not this application.
Other applications within 250 metres (context — nearby, not this application)
No other geocoded decision is recorded within 250 metres.