Planning application · Enfield
24/01179/HOU.
17 Grovelands Road London N13 4RJ
Householder at 17 Grovelands Road London N13 4RJ, received 10 Apr 2024 — refused on 17 Jun 2024 (delegated, Andrew Pommells).
ApprovedRefusedOther
At a glance · this applicationEnfield profile →
Refused
Outcome
17 Jun 2024
10 wks
Decision time
2 wks over the 8-week target
—
Conditions
not captured
21
Documents
21 linked
0
Objections
0 in support
No
Appeal
none recorded
Record from the Enfield planning register as captured; documents link to the council's own files. Nearby applications are context, not part of this application.
Application
What is it?
Demolition of existing lean-to single storey rear and side infill extension and rear dormer with patio doors and Juliette balcony
Reference
24/01179/HOU
Type
Householder
Applicant
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Postcode
N13 4RJ
Ward
Council
Received
10 Apr 2024
Validated
22 Apr 2024
Target date
17 Jun 2024
Decision date
17 Jun 2024
Decision route
Delegated (officer)
Status
Decided
Council register
Reference
24/01179/HOU
Type
Householder
Show all 16 rows
Applicant
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Postcode
N13 4RJ
Ward
Council
Received
10 Apr 2024
Validated
22 Apr 2024
Target date
17 Jun 2024
Decision date
17 Jun 2024
Decision route
Delegated (officer)
Status
Decided
Council register
Documents
What was filed?
Document
Published
View
Show all 10 rows
Documents open on the Enfield portal (the portal needs its documents tab opened first — the link handles that). View the application page ↗
Decision
What happened?
Refused on 17 Jun 2024, delegated decision by Andrew Pommells — 10 weeks from submission (2 over the 8-week target).
Timeline
Date
Event
10 Apr 2024
Application received
22 Apr 2024
Application validated
17 Jun 2024
Statutory target date
17 Jun 2024
Delegated decision: Refused · Andrew Pommells
10 Apr 2024
Application received
22 Apr 2024
Application validated
17 Jun 2024
Statutory target date
Show all 4 rows
17 Jun 2024
Delegated decision: Refused · Andrew Pommells
Why it was refused
Reason
As stated on the decision notice
1
The proposed dormer by reason of size, siting, design and materials used would represent an
overly dominant, incongruous and visually intrusive form of roof addition, out of keeping and character
with, and detrimental to, the appearance and character of the property and the Lakes Estate
Conservation Area. The proposal would be contrary to the London Plan Policies D4 and HC1, Core
Strategy Policies CP30 and CP31 and Development Management Document DMD 6, DMD 8, DMD13,
DMD37 and DMD44 as well as having regards to the Lakes Estate Conservation Area Character
Appraisal.
Dated: 17 June 2024
Authorised on behalf of:
Karen Page
Head of Planning and Building Control
Housing, Regeneration and Development Department
Enfield Council
PO Box 53, Civic Centre
Silver Street, Enfield
EN1 3XE
If you have any questions about this decision, please contact the planning officer
Andrew.Pommells@enfield.gov.uk.
List of plans and documents referred to in this Notice:
Title/Number Version TYPE
Application form Supporting Information
Press Notice Supporting Information
Flood map for planning Supporting Information
Location Map Drawing
GRIP-140-01 Drawing
GRIP-140-07 Drawing
GRIP-140-06 Drawing
Design and access statement Supporting Information
GRIP-140-05 Drawing
E01 01 Drawing
E03 01 Drawing
E02 01 Drawing
P02 01 Drawing
P01 01 Drawing
GRIP-140-04 Drawing
GRIP-140-03 Drawing
P01 2 0F 2 Drawing
P03 01 Drawing
GRIP-140-02 Drawing
Additional Information
APPEAL
Should you (an applicant or agent) feel aggrieved by the decision of the Council to either refuse
permission or to grant permission subject to conditions, you can
1
The proposed dormer by reason of size, siting, design and materials used would represent an
overly dominant, incongruous and visually intrusive form of roof addition, out of keeping and character
with, and detrimental to, the appearance and character of the property and the Lakes Estate
Conservation Area. The proposal would be contrary to the London Plan Policies D4 and HC1, Core
Strategy Policies CP30 and CP31 and Development Management Document DMD 6, DMD 8, DMD13,
DMD37 and DMD44 as well as having regards to the Lakes Estate Conservation Area Character
Appraisal.
Dated: 17 June 2024
Authorised on behalf of:
Karen Page
Head of Planning and Building Control
Housing, Regeneration and Development Department
Enfield Council
PO Box 53, Civic Centre
Silver Street, Enfield
EN1 3XE
If you have any questions about this decision, please contact the planning officer
Andrew.Pommells@enfield.gov.uk.
List of plans and documents referred to in this Notice:
Title/Number Version TYPE
Application form Supporting Information
Press Notice Supporting Information
Flood map for planning Supporting Information
Location Map Drawing
GRIP-140-01 Drawing
GRIP-140-07 Drawing
GRIP-140-06 Drawing
Design and access statement Supporting Information
GRIP-140-05 Drawing
E01 01 Drawing
E03 01 Drawing
E02 01 Drawing
P02 01 Drawing
P01 01 Drawing
GRIP-140-04 Drawing
GRIP-140-03 Drawing
P01 2 0F 2 Drawing
P03 01 Drawing
GRIP-140-02 Drawing
Additional Information
APPEAL
Should you (an applicant or agent) feel aggrieved by the decision of the Council to either refuse
permission or to grant permission subject to conditions, you can
Policies cited
D4HC1CP30CP31
Public response
Measure
Count
Objections
0
In support
0
Total comments
0
Objections
0
In support
0
Total comments
0
People
Who is involved?
Name
Role
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer — delegated decision
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer — delegated decision
Place
What affects it?
Context around the site — not part of this application. Designations over the site: use the map's designations filter (conservation areas, listed buildings, Article 4, flood risk …). Decisions within 250 metres of the site are listed below — context, not this application.
Other applications within 250 metres (context — nearby, not this application)
No other geocoded decision is recorded within 250 metres.