Planning Atlas
Planning AtlasEnfieldPonders End ward24/01395/FUL
Planning application · Enfield

24/01395/FUL.

128 High Street Enfield EN3 4ES

Full / Other Planning at 128 High Street Enfield EN3 4ES, received 29 Apr 2024 — refused on 11 Jul 2024 (delegated, Aaron Hawkins).

EnfieldPonders EndEN3 4ES24/01395/FUL
ApprovedRefusedOther
At a glance · this applicationEnfield profile →
Refused
Outcome
11 Jul 2024
10 wks
Decision time
2 wks over the 8-week target
Conditions
not captured
18
Documents
18 linked
0
Objections
0 in support
No
Appeal
none recorded
Record from the Enfield planning register as captured; documents link to the council's own files. Nearby applications are context, not part of this application.
Application

What is it?

First floor new Alfresco Dining Area featuring a guillotine glass balcony system and retractable aluminium roof.

Reference
24/01395/FUL
Type
Full
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Postcode
EN3 4ES
Council
Received
29 Apr 2024
Validated
16 May 2024
Target date
11 Jul 2024
Decision date
11 Jul 2024
Decision route
Delegated (officer)
Status
Decided
Reference
24/01395/FUL
Type
Full
Show all 16 rows
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Postcode
EN3 4ES
Council
Received
29 Apr 2024
Validated
16 May 2024
Target date
11 Jul 2024
Decision date
11 Jul 2024
Decision route
Delegated (officer)
Status
Decided
Documents

What was filed?

Document
Published
View
Officer report
24 Jul 2024
Decision Notice
11 Jul 2024
noise impact assessment
22 May 2024
HIGHWAY impact PROFORMA
22 May 2024
HERITAGE STATEMENT
22 May 2024
HERITAGE STATEMENT
22 May 2024
d & A STATEMENT
22 May 2024
Application Form - Without Personal Data
29 Apr 2024
FIRE STATEMENT
29 Apr 2024
BIODIVERSITY STATEMENT
29 Apr 2024
Officer report
24 Jul 2024
Decision Notice
11 Jul 2024
noise impact assessment
22 May 2024
Show all 10 rows
HIGHWAY impact PROFORMA
22 May 2024
HERITAGE STATEMENT
22 May 2024
HERITAGE STATEMENT
22 May 2024
d & A STATEMENT
22 May 2024
Application Form - Without Personal Data
29 Apr 2024
FIRE STATEMENT
29 Apr 2024
BIODIVERSITY STATEMENT
29 Apr 2024

Documents open on the Enfield portal (the portal needs its documents tab opened first — the link handles that). View the application page ↗

Decision

What happened?

Refused on 11 Jul 2024, delegated decision by Aaron Hawkins — 10 weeks from submission (2 over the 8-week target).

Timeline

Date
Event
29 Apr 2024
Application received
16 May 2024
Application validated
11 Jul 2024
Statutory target date
11 Jul 2024
Delegated decision: Refused · Aaron Hawkins
29 Apr 2024
Application received
16 May 2024
Application validated
11 Jul 2024
Statutory target date
Show all 4 rows
11 Jul 2024
Delegated decision: Refused · Aaron Hawkins

Why it was refused

Reason
As stated on the decision notice
1
The proposal would fail to create a high-quality design and would fail to preserve or enhance the character, appearance and significance of the non-designated heritage asset. The harm caused is not outweighed by public benefits and therefore the proposal fails to accord with Sections 12 and 16 of the National Planning Policy Framework (2023); Policies D3 and HC1 of the London Plan (2021); Policies DMD37, DMD39 and DMD44 of the Development Management Document (2014); and Policies CP30 and CP31 of the Core Strategy (2010). Dated: 11 July 2024 Authorised on behalf of: Karen Page Head of Planning and Building Control Housing, Regeneration and Development Department Enfield Council PO Box 53, Civic Centre Silver Street, Enfield EN1 3XE If you have any questions about this decision, please contact the planning officer aaron.hawkins@enfield.gov.uk. List of plans and documents referred to in this Notice: Title/Number Version TYPE 210902-21 P1 Drawing 210902-23 P1 Drawing 210902 - 24 P1 Drawing 210902 - 22 P1 Drawing Design and Access Statement Supporting Information Heritage Statement Supporting Information Biodiversity Statement Supporting Information Fire Statement Supporting Information Noise Impact Assessment Supporting Information Highway Impact Proforma Supporting Information 210902-20 PO Drawing APPEAL GUIDANCE: Should you (an applicant or agent) feel aggrieved by the decision of the Council to either refuse permission or to grant permission subject to conditions, you can
1
The proposal would fail to create a high-quality design and would fail to preserve or enhance the character, appearance and significance of the non-designated heritage asset. The harm caused is not outweighed by public benefits and therefore the proposal fails to accord with Sections 12 and 16 of the National Planning Policy Framework (2023); Policies D3 and HC1 of the London Plan (2021); Policies DMD37, DMD39 and DMD44 of the Development Management Document (2014); and Policies CP30 and CP31 of the Core Strategy (2010). Dated: 11 July 2024 Authorised on behalf of: Karen Page Head of Planning and Building Control Housing, Regeneration and Development Department Enfield Council PO Box 53, Civic Centre Silver Street, Enfield EN1 3XE If you have any questions about this decision, please contact the planning officer aaron.hawkins@enfield.gov.uk. List of plans and documents referred to in this Notice: Title/Number Version TYPE 210902-21 P1 Drawing 210902-23 P1 Drawing 210902 - 24 P1 Drawing 210902 - 22 P1 Drawing Design and Access Statement Supporting Information Heritage Statement Supporting Information Biodiversity Statement Supporting Information Fire Statement Supporting Information Noise Impact Assessment Supporting Information Highway Impact Proforma Supporting Information 210902-20 PO Drawing APPEAL GUIDANCE: Should you (an applicant or agent) feel aggrieved by the decision of the Council to either refuse permission or to grant permission subject to conditions, you can
Policies cited
National Planning Policy Framework 12National Planning Policy Framework 16D3HC1DMD37DMD39DMD44CP30CP31NPPF

Public response

Measure
Count
Objections
0
In support
0
Total comments
0
Objections
0
In support
0
Total comments
0
People

Who is involved?

Name
Role
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer — delegated decision
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer — delegated decision
Place

What affects it?

Context around the site — not part of this application. Designations over the site: use the map's designations filter (conservation areas, listed buildings, Article 4, flood risk …). Decisions within 250 metres of the site are listed below — context, not this application.

Other applications within 250 metres (context — nearby, not this application)

No other geocoded decision is recorded within 250 metres.