Planning application · Enfield
24/01779/HOU.
20 Brycedale Crescent London N14 7EY
Householder at 20 Brycedale Crescent London N14 7EY, received 31 May 2024 — refused on 8 Aug 2024 (delegated, Karim El-Houssami).
ApprovedRefusedOther
At a glance · this applicationEnfield profile →
Refused
Outcome
8 Aug 2024
10 wks
Decision time
2 wks over the 8-week target
—
Conditions
not captured
28
Documents
28 linked
0
Objections
0 in support
No
Appeal
none recorded
Record from the Enfield planning register as captured; documents link to the council's own files. Nearby applications are context, not part of this application.
Application
What is it?
Part single, part 2 storey front extension, extension to roof at side to form gable end with rear dormer and pitched roof to front porch.
Reference
24/01779/HOU
Type
Householder
Applicant
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Postcode
N14 7EY
Ward
Council
Received
31 May 2024
Validated
13 Jun 2024
Target date
8 Aug 2024
Decision date
8 Aug 2024
Decision route
Delegated (officer)
Status
Decided
Council register
Reference
24/01779/HOU
Type
Householder
Show all 16 rows
Applicant
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Postcode
N14 7EY
Ward
Council
Received
31 May 2024
Validated
13 Jun 2024
Target date
8 Aug 2024
Decision date
8 Aug 2024
Decision route
Delegated (officer)
Status
Decided
Council register
Documents
What was filed?
Document
Published
View
Show all 10 rows
Documents open on the Enfield portal (the portal needs its documents tab opened first — the link handles that). View the application page ↗
Decision
What happened?
Refused on 8 Aug 2024, delegated decision by Karim El-Houssami — 10 weeks from submission (2 over the 8-week target).
Timeline
Date
Event
31 May 2024
Application received
13 Jun 2024
Application validated
8 Aug 2024
Statutory target date
8 Aug 2024
Delegated decision: Refused · Karim El-Houssami
31 May 2024
Application received
13 Jun 2024
Application validated
8 Aug 2024
Statutory target date
Show all 4 rows
8 Aug 2024
Delegated decision: Refused · Karim El-Houssami
Why it was refused
Reason
As stated on the decision notice
1
The proposed rear dormer by reason of design and external finishing materials would represent
an incongruous, and visually intrusive form of development, out of keeping and character with,
and detrimental to, the appearance and character of the property and surrounding area. This
would be contrary to Core Strategy (2010) Policies CP30, Development Management Document
(2014) Polices DMD13 and DMD37, London Plan (2021) Policy D4 and National Planning Policy
Framework (2023)
Dated: 7 August 2024
Authorised on behalf of:
Karen Page
Head of Planning and Building Control
Housing, Regeneration and Development Department
Enfield Council
PO Box 53, Civic Centre
Silver Street, Enfield
EN1 3XE
If you have any questions about this decision, please contact the planning officer karim.el-
houssami@enfield.gov.uk.
List of plans and documents referred to in this Notice:
Title/Number Version TYPE
Design and Access Statement - 281_PL_800 Supporting Information
Location Plan Drawing
Existing Block Plan - 281_PL_000 Drawing
Existing Site Plan - 281_PL_002 Drawing
Existing Ground Floor Plan - 281_PL_100 Drawing
Existing First Floor Plan - 281_PL_105 Drawing
Existing Roof Plan - 281_PL_115 Drawing
Existing North Elevation - 281_PL_152 Drawing
Existing South Elevation - 281_PL_150 Drawing
Existing West Elevation - 281_PL_151 Drawing
Existing Section - 281_PL_132 Drawing
Proposed Block Plan - 281_PL_001 Drawing
Proposed Ground Floor Plan - 281_PL_200 Drawing
Proposed First Floor Plan - 281_PL_205 Drawing
Proposed Attic Plan - 281_PL_210 Drawing
Proposed Roof Plan - 281_PL_215 Drawing
Proposed North Elevation - 281_PL_352 Drawing
Proposed South Elevation - 281_PL_350 Drawing
Proposed West Elevation - 281_PL_351 Drawing
Proposed Rendered North Elevation - 281_PL_902 Drawing
Proposed Rendered South Elevation - 281_PL_900 Drawing
Proposed Rendered West Elevation - 281_PL_901 Drawing
Proposed Section - 281_PL_331 Drawing
APPEAL
Should you (an applicant or agent) feel aggrieved by the decision of the Council to either refuse
permission or to grant permission subject to conditions, you can
1
The proposed rear dormer by reason of design and external finishing materials would represent
an incongruous, and visually intrusive form of development, out of keeping and character with,
and detrimental to, the appearance and character of the property and surrounding area. This
would be contrary to Core Strategy (2010) Policies CP30, Development Management Document
(2014) Polices DMD13 and DMD37, London Plan (2021) Policy D4 and National Planning Policy
Framework (2023)
Dated: 7 August 2024
Authorised on behalf of:
Karen Page
Head of Planning and Building Control
Housing, Regeneration and Development Department
Enfield Council
PO Box 53, Civic Centre
Silver Street, Enfield
EN1 3XE
If you have any questions about this decision, please contact the planning officer karim.el-
houssami@enfield.gov.uk.
List of plans and documents referred to in this Notice:
Title/Number Version TYPE
Design and Access Statement - 281_PL_800 Supporting Information
Location Plan Drawing
Existing Block Plan - 281_PL_000 Drawing
Existing Site Plan - 281_PL_002 Drawing
Existing Ground Floor Plan - 281_PL_100 Drawing
Existing First Floor Plan - 281_PL_105 Drawing
Existing Roof Plan - 281_PL_115 Drawing
Existing North Elevation - 281_PL_152 Drawing
Existing South Elevation - 281_PL_150 Drawing
Existing West Elevation - 281_PL_151 Drawing
Existing Section - 281_PL_132 Drawing
Proposed Block Plan - 281_PL_001 Drawing
Proposed Ground Floor Plan - 281_PL_200 Drawing
Proposed First Floor Plan - 281_PL_205 Drawing
Proposed Attic Plan - 281_PL_210 Drawing
Proposed Roof Plan - 281_PL_215 Drawing
Proposed North Elevation - 281_PL_352 Drawing
Proposed South Elevation - 281_PL_350 Drawing
Proposed West Elevation - 281_PL_351 Drawing
Proposed Rendered North Elevation - 281_PL_902 Drawing
Proposed Rendered South Elevation - 281_PL_900 Drawing
Proposed Rendered West Elevation - 281_PL_901 Drawing
Proposed Section - 281_PL_331 Drawing
APPEAL
Should you (an applicant or agent) feel aggrieved by the decision of the Council to either refuse
permission or to grant permission subject to conditions, you can
Policies cited
CP30D4NPPF
Public response
Measure
Count
Objections
0
In support
0
Total comments
0
Objections
0
In support
0
Total comments
0
People
Who is involved?
Name
Role
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer — delegated decision
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer — delegated decision
Place
What affects it?
Context around the site — not part of this application. Designations over the site: use the map's designations filter (conservation areas, listed buildings, Article 4, flood risk …). Decisions within 250 metres of the site are listed below — context, not this application.
Other applications within 250 metres (context — nearby, not this application)
No other geocoded decision is recorded within 250 metres.