Planning Atlas
Planning AtlasEnfieldCockfosters ward24/02206/HOU
Planning application · Enfield

24/02206/HOU.

45 Crescent West Barnet EN4 0EQ

Householder at 45 Crescent West Barnet EN4 0EQ, received 2 Jul 2024 — refused on 17 Sep 2024 (delegated, Jeremiah Ayerh).

EnfieldCockfostersEN4 0EQ24/02206/HOU
ApprovedRefusedOther
At a glance · this applicationEnfield profile →
Refused
Outcome
17 Sep 2024
11 wks
Decision time
3 wks over the 8-week target
Conditions
not captured
14
Documents
14 linked
0
Objections
0 in support
Yes
Appeal
Appeal Dismissed
Record from the Enfield planning register as captured; documents link to the council's own files. Nearby applications are context, not part of this application.
Application

What is it?

First floor rear/side extension.

Reference
24/02206/HOU
Type
Householder
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Postcode
EN4 0EQ
Council
Received
2 Jul 2024
Validated
24 Jul 2024
Target date
18 Sep 2024
Decision date
17 Sep 2024
Decision route
Delegated (officer)
Status
Decided
Reference
24/02206/HOU
Type
Householder
Show all 16 rows
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Postcode
EN4 0EQ
Council
Received
2 Jul 2024
Validated
24 Jul 2024
Target date
18 Sep 2024
Decision date
17 Sep 2024
Decision route
Delegated (officer)
Status
Decided
Documents

What was filed?

Document
Published
View
Report
18 Sept 2024
Decision Notice
17 Sept 2024
Press Notice 14.8.24
19 Aug 2024
Heritage Statement.
24 Jul 2024
Section Plan
24 Jul 2024
Existing and Proposed Roof Plans.
24 Jul 2024
Application Form - Without Personal Data
2 Jul 2024
EXISTING AND PROPOSED SIDE ELEVATION
2 Jul 2024
EXISTING AND PROPOSED FRONT ELEVATION PLAN
2 Jul 2024
LOCATION AND BLOCK PLAN
2 Jul 2024
Report
18 Sept 2024
Decision Notice
17 Sept 2024
Press Notice 14.8.24
19 Aug 2024
Show all 10 rows
Heritage Statement.
24 Jul 2024
Section Plan
24 Jul 2024
Existing and Proposed Roof Plans.
24 Jul 2024
Application Form - Without Personal Data
2 Jul 2024
EXISTING AND PROPOSED SIDE ELEVATION
2 Jul 2024
EXISTING AND PROPOSED FRONT ELEVATION PLAN
2 Jul 2024
LOCATION AND BLOCK PLAN
2 Jul 2024

Documents open on the Enfield portal (the portal needs its documents tab opened first — the link handles that). View the application page ↗

Decision

What happened?

Refused on 17 Sep 2024, delegated decision by Jeremiah Ayerh — 11 weeks from submission (3 over the 8-week target).

Timeline

Date
Event
2 Jul 2024
Application received
24 Jul 2024
Application validated
18 Sep 2024
Statutory target date
17 Sep 2024
Delegated decision: Refused · Jeremiah Ayerh
Appeal
Appeal decided · Appeal Dismissed
2 Jul 2024
Application received
24 Jul 2024
Application validated
18 Sep 2024
Statutory target date
Show all 5 rows
17 Sep 2024
Delegated decision: Refused · Jeremiah Ayerh
Appeal
Appeal decided · Appeal Dismissed

Why it was refused

Reason
As stated on the decision notice
1
The proposed first floor side/rear extension by reason of its siting, design, size and bulk would result in an unduly prominent and incongruous form of development that would detract from the character and visual appearance of the existing property, the original mirrored design of this pair of semi-detached houses and would result in demonstrable harm to the setting of the Hadley Wood Conservation Area and the visual amenities of the street scene. The proposal is therefore contry to the National Planning Policy Framework, Policies D3, D8 and HC1 of the London Plan (2021); Policy HW-1 and HW-12 of the Hadley Wood Neighbourhood Plan, Policy CP30 of the Enfield Plan Core Strategy and Policies DMD13, DMD14, DMD37 and DMD44 of the Development Management Document (2014). Dated: 17 September 2024 Authorised on behalf of: Karen Page Head of Planning and Building Control Housing, Regeneration and Development Department Enfield Council PO Box 53, Civic Centre Silver Street, Enfield EN1 3XE If you have any questions about this decision, please contact the planning officer Jeremiah.ayerh@enfield.gov.uk. List of plans and documents referred to in this Notice: Title/Number Version TYPE 301 Drawing 304 Drawing 307 Drawing 302 Drawing 305 Drawing 303 Drawing 308 Drawing 306 Drawing Heritage Statement Additional Information APPEAL Should you (an applicant or agent) feel aggrieved by the decision of the Council to either refuse permission or to grant permission subject to conditions, you can
1
The proposed first floor side/rear extension by reason of its siting, design, size and bulk would result in an unduly prominent and incongruous form of development that would detract from the character and visual appearance of the existing property, the original mirrored design of this pair of semi-detached houses and would result in demonstrable harm to the setting of the Hadley Wood Conservation Area and the visual amenities of the street scene. The proposal is therefore contry to the National Planning Policy Framework, Policies D3, D8 and HC1 of the London Plan (2021); Policy HW-1 and HW-12 of the Hadley Wood Neighbourhood Plan, Policy CP30 of the Enfield Plan Core Strategy and Policies DMD13, DMD14, DMD37 and DMD44 of the Development Management Document (2014). Dated: 17 September 2024 Authorised on behalf of: Karen Page Head of Planning and Building Control Housing, Regeneration and Development Department Enfield Council PO Box 53, Civic Centre Silver Street, Enfield EN1 3XE If you have any questions about this decision, please contact the planning officer Jeremiah.ayerh@enfield.gov.uk. List of plans and documents referred to in this Notice: Title/Number Version TYPE 301 Drawing 304 Drawing 307 Drawing 302 Drawing 305 Drawing 303 Drawing 308 Drawing 306 Drawing Heritage Statement Additional Information APPEAL Should you (an applicant or agent) feel aggrieved by the decision of the Council to either refuse permission or to grant permission subject to conditions, you can
Policies cited
D3D8HC1Hadley Wood Neighbourhood Plan 12CP30DMD13DMD14DMD37DMD44NPPF

Appeal

Appeal
Outcome
Appeal decided
Outcome: Appeal Dismissed
Appeal decided
Outcome: Appeal Dismissed

Public response

Measure
Count
Objections
0
In support
0
Total comments
0
Objections
0
In support
0
Total comments
0
People

Who is involved?

Name
Role
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer — delegated decision
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer — delegated decision
Place

What affects it?

Context around the site — not part of this application. Designations over the site: use the map's designations filter (conservation areas, listed buildings, Article 4, flood risk …). Decisions within 250 metres of the site are listed below — context, not this application.

Other applications within 250 metres (context — nearby, not this application)

No other geocoded decision is recorded within 250 metres.