Planning Atlas
Planning AtlasEnfieldBush Hill Park ward24/03230/HOU
Planning application · Enfield

24/03230/HOU.

74 Firs Lane London N21 3HX

Householder at 74 Firs Lane London N21 3HX, received 26 Sep 2024 — refused on 20 Nov 2024 (delegated, Karim El-Houssami).

EnfieldBush Hill ParkN21 3HX24/03230/HOU
ApprovedRefusedOther
At a glance · this applicationEnfield profile →
Refused
Outcome
20 Nov 2024
8 wks
Decision time
inside the 8-week target
Conditions
not captured
12
Documents
12 linked
1
Objections
0 in support
No
Appeal
none recorded
Record from the Enfield planning register as captured; documents link to the council's own files. Nearby applications are context, not part of this application.
Application

What is it?

First floor rear extension.

Reference
24/03230/HOU
Type
Householder
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Postcode
N21 3HX
Council
Received
26 Sep 2024
Validated
30 Sep 2024
Target date
25 Nov 2024
Decision date
20 Nov 2024
Decision route
Delegated (officer)
Status
Decided
Reference
24/03230/HOU
Type
Householder
Show all 16 rows
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Postcode
N21 3HX
Council
Received
26 Sep 2024
Validated
30 Sep 2024
Target date
25 Nov 2024
Decision date
20 Nov 2024
Decision route
Delegated (officer)
Status
Decided
Documents

What was filed?

Document
Published
View
Decision Notice
20 Nov 2024
REPORT
20 Nov 2024
EXISTING AND PROPOSED SECTIONS
30 Sept 2024
Application Form - Without Personal Data
26 Sept 2024
The location plan
26 Sept 2024
EXISTING AND PROPOSED FIRST FLOOR PLANS
26 Sept 2024
EXISTING AND PROPOSED FRONT ELEVATIONS
26 Sept 2024
EXISTING AND PROPOSED REAR ELEVATIONS
26 Sept 2024
EXISTING AND PROPOSED ROOF PLANS
26 Sept 2024
EXISTING AND PROPOSED SIDE ELEVATIONS
26 Sept 2024
Decision Notice
20 Nov 2024
REPORT
20 Nov 2024
EXISTING AND PROPOSED SECTIONS
30 Sept 2024
Show all 10 rows
Application Form - Without Personal Data
26 Sept 2024
The location plan
26 Sept 2024
EXISTING AND PROPOSED FIRST FLOOR PLANS
26 Sept 2024
EXISTING AND PROPOSED FRONT ELEVATIONS
26 Sept 2024
EXISTING AND PROPOSED REAR ELEVATIONS
26 Sept 2024
EXISTING AND PROPOSED ROOF PLANS
26 Sept 2024
EXISTING AND PROPOSED SIDE ELEVATIONS
26 Sept 2024

Documents open on the Enfield portal (the portal needs its documents tab opened first — the link handles that). View the application page ↗

Decision

What happened?

Refused on 20 Nov 2024, delegated decision by Karim El-Houssami — 8 weeks from submission.

Timeline

Date
Event
26 Sep 2024
Application received
30 Sep 2024
Application validated
25 Nov 2024
Statutory target date
20 Nov 2024
Delegated decision: Refused · Karim El-Houssami
26 Sep 2024
Application received
30 Sep 2024
Application validated
25 Nov 2024
Statutory target date
Show all 4 rows
20 Nov 2024
Delegated decision: Refused · Karim El-Houssami

Why it was refused

Reason
As stated on the decision notice
1
The proposed first floor rear together with the existing rear dormer extension, by virtue of its design, size and siting, would appear excessively large, visually intrusive, incongruous, overly dominant and out of keeping with the character and appearance of the original building, the row of terrace properties, and the surrounding area of which it forms part, contrary to Section 12 of the National Planning Policy Framework (2023), Policies D3, D4, D5, D8 of the London Plan (2021), CP30 of the Enfield Core Strategy (2010) and DMD6, DMD8, DMD11, DMD13 and DMD37 of the Enfield Development Management Document (2014). Dated: 20 November 2024 Authorised on behalf of: Karen Page Head of Planning and Building Control Housing, Regeneration and Development Department Enfield Council PO Box 53, Civic Centre Silver Street, Enfield EN1 3XE If you have any questions about this decision, please contact the planning officer karim.el- houssami@enfield.gov.uk. List of plans and documents referred to in this Notice: Title/Number Version TYPE Location Plan - PP-13432938v1 Drawing Block Plan Drawing Existing and Proposed First Floor Plans - ku-firslane01 Drawing Existing and Proposed Front Elevation - ku-firslane02 Drawing Existing and Proposed Rear Elevations - ku-firslane03 Drawing Existing and Proposed Side Elevation - ku-firslane05 Drawing Existing and Proposed Sections - ku-firslane06 Drawing Existing and Proposed Roof Plans - ku-firslane04 Drawing Additional Information APPEAL Should you (an applicant or agent) feel aggrieved by the decision of the Council to either refuse permission or to grant permission subject to conditions, you can
1
The proposed first floor rear together with the existing rear dormer extension, by virtue of its design, size and siting, would appear excessively large, visually intrusive, incongruous, overly dominant and out of keeping with the character and appearance of the original building, the row of terrace properties, and the surrounding area of which it forms part, contrary to Section 12 of the National Planning Policy Framework (2023), Policies D3, D4, D5, D8 of the London Plan (2021), CP30 of the Enfield Core Strategy (2010) and DMD6, DMD8, DMD11, DMD13 and DMD37 of the Enfield Development Management Document (2014). Dated: 20 November 2024 Authorised on behalf of: Karen Page Head of Planning and Building Control Housing, Regeneration and Development Department Enfield Council PO Box 53, Civic Centre Silver Street, Enfield EN1 3XE If you have any questions about this decision, please contact the planning officer karim.el- houssami@enfield.gov.uk. List of plans and documents referred to in this Notice: Title/Number Version TYPE Location Plan - PP-13432938v1 Drawing Block Plan Drawing Existing and Proposed First Floor Plans - ku-firslane01 Drawing Existing and Proposed Front Elevation - ku-firslane02 Drawing Existing and Proposed Rear Elevations - ku-firslane03 Drawing Existing and Proposed Side Elevation - ku-firslane05 Drawing Existing and Proposed Sections - ku-firslane06 Drawing Existing and Proposed Roof Plans - ku-firslane04 Drawing Additional Information APPEAL Should you (an applicant or agent) feel aggrieved by the decision of the Council to either refuse permission or to grant permission subject to conditions, you can
Policies cited
National Planning Policy Framework 12D3D4D5D8CP30DMD6DMD8DMD11DMD13DMD37NPPF

Public response

Measure
Count
Objections
1
In support
0
Total comments
1
Objections
1
In support
0
Total comments
1
People

Who is involved?

Name
Role
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer — delegated decision
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer — delegated decision
Place

What affects it?

Context around the site — not part of this application. Designations over the site: use the map's designations filter (conservation areas, listed buildings, Article 4, flood risk …). Decisions within 250 metres of the site are listed below — context, not this application.

Other applications within 250 metres (context — nearby, not this application)

No other geocoded decision is recorded within 250 metres.