Planning Atlas
Planning AtlasEnfieldTown ward24/03328/FUL
Planning application · Enfield

24/03328/FUL.

St Pauls Community Centre Church Street Enfield EN2 6AR

Full / Other Planning at St Pauls Community Centre Church Street Enfield EN2 6AR, received 7 Oct 2024 — refused on 5 Dec 2024 (delegated, Aaron Hawkins).

EnfieldTownEN2 6AR24/03328/FUL
ApprovedRefusedOther
At a glance · this applicationEnfield profile →
Refused
Outcome
5 Dec 2024
8 wks
Decision time
inside the 8-week target
Conditions
not captured
12
Documents
12 linked
Objections
not captured
No
Appeal
none recorded
Record from the Enfield planning register as captured; documents link to the council's own files. Nearby applications are context, not part of this application.
Application

What is it?

Replacement of window with doors and juliette balcony.

Reference
24/03328/FUL
Type
Full
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Postcode
EN2 6AR
Ward
Council
Received
7 Oct 2024
Validated
22 Oct 2024
Target date
17 Dec 2024
Decision date
5 Dec 2024
Decision route
Delegated (officer)
Status
Decided
Reference
24/03328/FUL
Type
Full
Show all 16 rows
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Postcode
EN2 6AR
Ward
Council
Received
7 Oct 2024
Validated
22 Oct 2024
Target date
17 Dec 2024
Decision date
5 Dec 2024
Decision route
Delegated (officer)
Status
Decided
Documents

What was filed?

Document
Published
View
Decision Notice
5 Dec 2024
Officer Report
5 Dec 2024
APPLICATION FORM - WITHOUT PERSONAL DATA
22 Oct 2024
proposed elevations and sections
22 Oct 2024
cover letter
22 Oct 2024
location plan
22 Oct 2024
location plan
22 Oct 2024
existing elevations
22 Oct 2024
proposed elevations
22 Oct 2024
DESIGN AND ACCESS STATEMENT
7 Oct 2024
Decision Notice
5 Dec 2024
Officer Report
5 Dec 2024
APPLICATION FORM - WITHOUT PERSONAL DATA
22 Oct 2024
Show all 10 rows
proposed elevations and sections
22 Oct 2024
cover letter
22 Oct 2024
location plan
22 Oct 2024
location plan
22 Oct 2024
existing elevations
22 Oct 2024
proposed elevations
22 Oct 2024
DESIGN AND ACCESS STATEMENT
7 Oct 2024

Documents open on the Enfield portal (the portal needs its documents tab opened first — the link handles that). View the application page ↗

Decision

What happened?

Refused on 5 Dec 2024, delegated decision by Aaron Hawkins — 8 weeks from submission.

Timeline

Date
Event
7 Oct 2024
Application received
22 Oct 2024
Application validated
17 Dec 2024
Statutory target date
5 Dec 2024
Delegated decision: Refused · Aaron Hawkins
7 Oct 2024
Application received
22 Oct 2024
Application validated
17 Dec 2024
Statutory target date
Show all 4 rows
5 Dec 2024
Delegated decision: Refused · Aaron Hawkins

Why it was refused

Reason
As stated on the decision notice
1
The Juliet balcony, by virtue of its design and proportions, would create a visually intrusive form of development that would be out of keeping with the character and appearance of the host property and would be detrimental to the character of the surrounding Enfield Town Conservation Area. The proposal is therefore contrary to policies CP30 and CP31 of the Core Strategy (2010), Policies DMD37 and DMD44 of the Development Management Document (2014), Policies HC1 and D4 of The London Plan (2021) and guidance contained within the National Planning Policy Framework. Dated: 5 December 2024 Authorised on behalf of: Karen Page Head of Planning and Building Control Housing, Regeneration and Development Department Enfield Council PO Box 53, Civic Centre Silver Street, Enfield EN1 3XE If you have any questions about this decision, please contact the planning officer aaron.hawkins@enfield.gov.uk. List of plans and documents referred to in this Notice: Title/Number Version TYPE PP-GG-01 Drawing PP-GG-010 Drawing PP-GG-02 Drawing PP-GG-021 Drawing PP-GG-022 Drawing PP-GG-011 Drawing Heritage Statement Supporting Information Cover Letter Supporting Information Desgin and Access Statement Supporting Information APPEAL GUIDANCE: Should you (an applicant or agent) feel aggrieved by the decision of the Council to either refuse permission or to grant permission subject to conditions, you can
1
The Juliet balcony, by virtue of its design and proportions, would create a visually intrusive form of development that would be out of keeping with the character and appearance of the host property and would be detrimental to the character of the surrounding Enfield Town Conservation Area. The proposal is therefore contrary to policies CP30 and CP31 of the Core Strategy (2010), Policies DMD37 and DMD44 of the Development Management Document (2014), Policies HC1 and D4 of The London Plan (2021) and guidance contained within the National Planning Policy Framework. Dated: 5 December 2024 Authorised on behalf of: Karen Page Head of Planning and Building Control Housing, Regeneration and Development Department Enfield Council PO Box 53, Civic Centre Silver Street, Enfield EN1 3XE If you have any questions about this decision, please contact the planning officer aaron.hawkins@enfield.gov.uk. List of plans and documents referred to in this Notice: Title/Number Version TYPE PP-GG-01 Drawing PP-GG-010 Drawing PP-GG-02 Drawing PP-GG-021 Drawing PP-GG-022 Drawing PP-GG-011 Drawing Heritage Statement Supporting Information Cover Letter Supporting Information Desgin and Access Statement Supporting Information APPEAL GUIDANCE: Should you (an applicant or agent) feel aggrieved by the decision of the Council to either refuse permission or to grant permission subject to conditions, you can
Policies cited
CP30CP31DMD37DMD44HC1D4NPPF

Public response

Comment counts were not captured for this application.

People

Who is involved?

Name
Role
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer — delegated decision
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer — delegated decision
Place

What affects it?

Context around the site — not part of this application. Designations over the site: use the map's designations filter (conservation areas, listed buildings, Article 4, flood risk …). Decisions within 250 metres of the site are listed below — context, not this application.

Other applications within 250 metres (context — nearby, not this application)

No other geocoded decision is recorded within 250 metres.