Planning application · Enfield
24/03550/FUL.
Car Park Rear Of 62 And 64 Fore Street N18
Full / Other Planning at Car Park Rear Of 62 And 64 Fore Street N18 — refused (delegated, Karolina Grebowiec-Hall).
ApprovedRefusedOther
At a glance · this applicationEnfield profile →
Refused
Outcome
no decision date
—
Decision time
submission → decision
—
Conditions
not captured
23
Documents
23 linked
—
Objections
not captured
No
Appeal
none recorded
Record from the Enfield planning register as captured; documents link to the council's own files. Nearby applications are context, not part of this application.
Application
What is it?
The council record carries no proposal text.
Reference
24/03550/FUL
Type
Full
Applicant
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Ward
Council
Received
—
Decision date
—
Decision route
Delegated (officer)
Status
Decided
Council register
Reference
24/03550/FUL
Type
Full
Show all 13 rows
Applicant
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Ward
Council
Received
—
Decision date
—
Decision route
Delegated (officer)
Status
Decided
Council register
Documents
What was filed?
Document
Published
View
Documents open on the Enfield portal (the portal needs its documents tab opened first — the link handles that). View the application page ↗
Decision
What happened?
Refused, delegated decision by Karolina Grebowiec-Hall.
Timeline
No dated events are recorded.
Why it was refused
Reason
As stated on the decision notice
1
The proposed development, by reason of its siting, design and visibility from the public realm
would fail to preserve or enhance the character and appearance of the Fore Street Conservation Area
and would be detrimental to the visual amenities of the street scene and surrounding area, being
contrary to Policies D3, D4, D8 and HC1 of the London Plan 2021; Policies CP30 and CP31 of the
Core Strategy 2010 and Policies DMD37, DMD39 and DMD44 of the Enfield Development
Management Document 2014.
2
The proposed change of use by reason of its siting in proximity to neighbouring residential
properties would give rise to an unacceptable increase in noise and disturbance that would detract
from the from the amenities of the occupiers of nearby residential properties, contrary to Policy D14 of
the London Plan 2021, Policy CP30 of the Enfield Core Strategy 2010 and Policies DMD37 and
DMD68 of the Enfield Development Management Document 2014.
3
The proposed change of use would fail to provide acceptable access and egress arrangements
to Alpha road and inadequate vehicle management to ensure that the use would not give rise to
conditions prejudicial to the free flow and safety of vehicular traffic and pedestrians. The proposed
development would therefore be contrary to Policies T5 of the London Plan 2021; Policies CP24 and
CP25 of the Core Strategy 2010; Policies DMD45 and DMD47 of the Enfield Development
Management Document 2014.
4
The proposed development, in the absence of adequate cycle storage, fails to provide a
secure, convenient and high quality facility for all types of bicycles and would fail to prioritise or
promote the use of sustainable modes of transport, contrary to Policies T2, T3, T4, T6, T6.1 and T7 of
the London Plan 2021, CP24 and CP25 of the Enfield Core Strategy (2010), DMD45, DMD46, DMD47
and DMD48 of the Enfield Development Management Document (2014.)
5
The proposed development, in the absence of an adequate sustainable drainage strategy and
acceptable arrangements for the disposal of commercial waste run-off water fails to demonstrate how
proposed measures manage the risk of flooding from surface water run-off and follow the drainage
hierarchy in the London Plan and would increase the risk of water pollution contrary to Policies SI 12
and SI 13 of the London Plan (2021), Policy CP28 of the Enfield Core Strategy 2010, Policies DMD59,
DMD60, DMD61, DMD62 and of the Enfield Development Management Document (2014).
Dated: 28 March 2025
Authorised on behalf of:
Karen Page
Head of Planning and Building Control
Housing, Regeneration and Development Department
Enfield Council
PO Box 53, Civic Centre
Silver Street, Enfield
EN1 3XE
If you have any questions about this decision, please contact the planning officer karolina.grebowiec-
hall@enfield.gov.uk.
List of plans and documents referred to in this Notice:
Title/Number Version TYPE
Foul and Surface Water Drainage Strategy Supporting Information
Proposed Front Elevation Side Elevation FR64/23/07 Drawing
Proposed Rear Elevation Side Elevation FR64/23/08 Drawing
Proposed Roof Plan FR64/23/10 Drawing
Location Plan Drawing
Proposed Site Plan FR64/23/06 Drawing
Proposed Site Plan FR64/23/05 Drawing
Car Wash Management Plan Supporting Information
Noise Impact Assessment Issue 1 Supporting Information
Energy Statement Supporting Information
Additional Information
APPEAL GUIDANCE:
Should you (an applicant or agent) feel aggrieved by the decision of the Council to either refuse
permission or to grant permission subject to conditions, you can
1
The proposed development, by reason of its siting, design and visibility from the public realm
would fail to preserve or enhance the character and appearance of the Fore Street Conservation Area
and would be detrimental to the visual amenities of the street scene and surrounding area, being
contrary to Policies D3, D4, D8 and HC1 of the London Plan 2021; Policies CP30 and CP31 of the
Core Strategy 2010 and Policies DMD37, DMD39 and DMD44 of the Enfield Development
Management Document 2014.
2
The proposed change of use by reason of its siting in proximity to neighbouring residential
properties would give rise to an unacceptable increase in noise and disturbance that would detract
from the from the amenities of the occupiers of nearby residential properties, contrary to Policy D14 of
the London Plan 2021, Policy CP30 of the Enfield Core Strategy 2010 and Policies DMD37 and
DMD68 of the Enfield Development Management Document 2014.
3
The proposed change of use would fail to provide acceptable access and egress arrangements
to Alpha road and inadequate vehicle management to ensure that the use would not give rise to
conditions prejudicial to the free flow and safety of vehicular traffic and pedestrians. The proposed
development would therefore be contrary to Policies T5 of the London Plan 2021; Policies CP24 and
CP25 of the Core Strategy 2010; Policies DMD45 and DMD47 of the Enfield Development
Management Document 2014.
Show all 5 rows
4
The proposed development, in the absence of adequate cycle storage, fails to provide a
secure, convenient and high quality facility for all types of bicycles and would fail to prioritise or
promote the use of sustainable modes of transport, contrary to Policies T2, T3, T4, T6, T6.1 and T7 of
the London Plan 2021, CP24 and CP25 of the Enfield Core Strategy (2010), DMD45, DMD46, DMD47
and DMD48 of the Enfield Development Management Document (2014.)
5
The proposed development, in the absence of an adequate sustainable drainage strategy and
acceptable arrangements for the disposal of commercial waste run-off water fails to demonstrate how
proposed measures manage the risk of flooding from surface water run-off and follow the drainage
hierarchy in the London Plan and would increase the risk of water pollution contrary to Policies SI 12
and SI 13 of the London Plan (2021), Policy CP28 of the Enfield Core Strategy 2010, Policies DMD59,
DMD60, DMD61, DMD62 and of the Enfield Development Management Document (2014).
Dated: 28 March 2025
Authorised on behalf of:
Karen Page
Head of Planning and Building Control
Housing, Regeneration and Development Department
Enfield Council
PO Box 53, Civic Centre
Silver Street, Enfield
EN1 3XE
If you have any questions about this decision, please contact the planning officer karolina.grebowiec-
hall@enfield.gov.uk.
List of plans and documents referred to in this Notice:
Title/Number Version TYPE
Foul and Surface Water Drainage Strategy Supporting Information
Proposed Front Elevation Side Elevation FR64/23/07 Drawing
Proposed Rear Elevation Side Elevation FR64/23/08 Drawing
Proposed Roof Plan FR64/23/10 Drawing
Location Plan Drawing
Proposed Site Plan FR64/23/06 Drawing
Proposed Site Plan FR64/23/05 Drawing
Car Wash Management Plan Supporting Information
Noise Impact Assessment Issue 1 Supporting Information
Energy Statement Supporting Information
Additional Information
APPEAL GUIDANCE:
Should you (an applicant or agent) feel aggrieved by the decision of the Council to either refuse
permission or to grant permission subject to conditions, you can
Policies cited
D3D4D8HC1CP30CP31DMD37DMD39DMD44D14DMD68T5CP24CP25DMD45DMD47T2T3T4T6T6.1T7DMD46DMD48SI12SI13CP28
Public response
Comment counts were not captured for this application.
People
Who is involved?
Name
Role
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer — delegated decision
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer — delegated decision
Place
What affects it?
Context around the site — not part of this application. Designations over the site: use the map's designations filter (conservation areas, listed buildings, Article 4, flood risk …). Decisions within 250 metres of the site are listed below — context, not this application.
Other applications within 250 metres (context — nearby, not this application)
No other geocoded decision is recorded within 250 metres.