Planning Atlas
Planning AtlasEnfieldGrange Park ward25/00347/HOU
Planning application · Enfield

25/00347/HOU.

2 Clarendon Way London N21 2LX

Householder at 2 Clarendon Way London N21 2LX, received 29 Jan 2025 — refused on 26 Mar 2025 (delegated, Jeremiah Ayerh).

EnfieldGrange ParkN21 2LX25/00347/HOU
ApprovedRefusedOther
At a glance · this applicationEnfield profile →
Refused
Outcome
26 Mar 2025
8 wks
Decision time
inside the 8-week target
Conditions
not captured
41
Documents
41 linked
0
Objections
0 in support
Yes
Appeal
Appeal Dismissed
Record from the Enfield planning register as captured; documents link to the council's own files. Nearby applications are context, not part of this application.
Application

What is it?

Single storey side extension, conversion of garage into habitable room and single storey rear extension with a raised rear patio.

Reference
25/00347/HOU
Type
Householder
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Postcode
N21 2LX
Council
Received
29 Jan 2025
Validated
24 Feb 2025
Target date
21 Apr 2025
Decision date
26 Mar 2025
Decision route
Delegated (officer)
Status
Decided
Reference
25/00347/HOU
Type
Householder
Show all 16 rows
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Postcode
N21 2LX
Council
Received
29 Jan 2025
Validated
24 Feb 2025
Target date
21 Apr 2025
Decision date
26 Mar 2025
Decision route
Delegated (officer)
Status
Decided
Documents

What was filed?

Document
Published
View
Decision Notice
26 Mar 2025
Report
26 Mar 2025
Officer Report
26 Mar 2025
AMENDMENT : Proposal
25 Feb 2025
AMENDMENT : Application Form
25 Feb 2025
AMENDMENT : Application Form - Without Personal Data
25 Feb 2025
AMENDMENT : How the fee was calculated
25 Feb 2025
AMENDMENT : A summary of the attachments in the proposal
25 Feb 2025
AMENDMENT : Delta Summary
25 Feb 2025
AMENDMENT : The location plan
25 Feb 2025
Decision Notice
26 Mar 2025
Report
26 Mar 2025
Officer Report
26 Mar 2025
Show all 10 rows
AMENDMENT : Proposal
25 Feb 2025
AMENDMENT : Application Form
25 Feb 2025
AMENDMENT : Application Form - Without Personal Data
25 Feb 2025
AMENDMENT : How the fee was calculated
25 Feb 2025
AMENDMENT : A summary of the attachments in the proposal
25 Feb 2025
AMENDMENT : Delta Summary
25 Feb 2025
AMENDMENT : The location plan
25 Feb 2025

Documents open on the Enfield portal (the portal needs its documents tab opened first — the link handles that). View the application page ↗

Decision

What happened?

Refused on 26 Mar 2025, delegated decision by Jeremiah Ayerh — 8 weeks from submission.

Timeline

Date
Event
29 Jan 2025
Application received
24 Feb 2025
Application validated
21 Apr 2025
Statutory target date
26 Mar 2025
Delegated decision: Refused · Jeremiah Ayerh
Appeal
Appeal decided · Appeal Dismissed
29 Jan 2025
Application received
24 Feb 2025
Application validated
21 Apr 2025
Statutory target date
Show all 5 rows
26 Mar 2025
Delegated decision: Refused · Jeremiah Ayerh
Appeal
Appeal decided · Appeal Dismissed

Why it was refused

Reason
As stated on the decision notice
1
The proposed development, in the absence of a sufficient SuDs strategy and Flood Risk Assessment, fails to demonstrate how proposed measures manage the risk of flooding and utilise Sustainable Urban Drainage Systems (SuDS) following the drainage hierarchy in the London Plan. The proposal is therefore contrary to Section 14 of the National Planning Policy Framework (2024), to policies SI12 and SI 13 of the London Plan (2021), to policies CP21 and CP28 of the Enfield Core Strategy (2010), to policies DMD59, DMD60 and DMD61 of the Enfield Development Management Document (2014), and the Enfield Strategic Flood Risk Assessment. Dated: 26 March 2025 Authorised on behalf of: Karen Page Head of Planning and Building Control Housing, Regeneration and Development Department Enfield Council PO Box 53, Civic Centre Silver Street, Enfield EN1 3XE If you have any questions about this decision, please contact the planning officer Jeremiah.ayerh@enfield.gov.uk. List of plans and documents referred to in this Notice: Title/Number Version TYPE 390/02 C Drawing 390/01 D Drawing 390/52 E Drawing 390/51 E Drawing 390/53 A Drawing Location Plan Drawing 390/10B Drawing Flood Risk Assessment Supporting Information Additional Information APPEAL Should you (an applicant or agent) feel aggrieved by the decision of the Council to either refuse permission or to grant permission subject to conditions, you can
1
The proposed development, in the absence of a sufficient SuDs strategy and Flood Risk Assessment, fails to demonstrate how proposed measures manage the risk of flooding and utilise Sustainable Urban Drainage Systems (SuDS) following the drainage hierarchy in the London Plan. The proposal is therefore contrary to Section 14 of the National Planning Policy Framework (2024), to policies SI12 and SI 13 of the London Plan (2021), to policies CP21 and CP28 of the Enfield Core Strategy (2010), to policies DMD59, DMD60 and DMD61 of the Enfield Development Management Document (2014), and the Enfield Strategic Flood Risk Assessment. Dated: 26 March 2025 Authorised on behalf of: Karen Page Head of Planning and Building Control Housing, Regeneration and Development Department Enfield Council PO Box 53, Civic Centre Silver Street, Enfield EN1 3XE If you have any questions about this decision, please contact the planning officer Jeremiah.ayerh@enfield.gov.uk. List of plans and documents referred to in this Notice: Title/Number Version TYPE 390/02 C Drawing 390/01 D Drawing 390/52 E Drawing 390/51 E Drawing 390/53 A Drawing Location Plan Drawing 390/10B Drawing Flood Risk Assessment Supporting Information Additional Information APPEAL Should you (an applicant or agent) feel aggrieved by the decision of the Council to either refuse permission or to grant permission subject to conditions, you can
Policies cited
National Planning Policy Framework 14SI12SI13CP21CP28DMD59DMD60DMD61NPPF

Appeal

Appeal
Outcome
Appeal decided
Outcome: Appeal Dismissed
Appeal decided
Outcome: Appeal Dismissed

Public response

Measure
Count
Objections
0
In support
0
Total comments
0
Objections
0
In support
0
Total comments
0
People

Who is involved?

Name
Role
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer — delegated decision
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer — delegated decision
Place

What affects it?

Context around the site — not part of this application. Designations over the site: use the map's designations filter (conservation areas, listed buildings, Article 4, flood risk …). Decisions within 250 metres of the site are listed below — context, not this application.

Other applications within 250 metres (context — nearby, not this application)

No other geocoded decision is recorded within 250 metres.