Planning Atlas
Planning AtlasEnfieldJubilee wardN9 8BD25/01556/FUL
Planning application · Enfield

25/01556/FUL.

221 Sandhurst Road London N9 8BD

Full / Other Planning at 221 Sandhurst Road London N9 8BD, received 28 Apr 2025 — refused on 20 Jun 2025 (delegated, Nurgul Kinli).

EnfieldJubileeN9 8BD25/01556/FUL
ApprovedRefusedOther
At a glance · this applicationEnfield profile →
Refused
Outcome
20 Jun 2025
8 wks
Decision time
inside the 8-week target
Conditions
not captured
21
Documents
21 linked
Objections
not captured
No
Appeal
none recorded
Record from the Enfield planning register as captured; documents link to the council's own files. Nearby applications are context, not part of this application.
Application

What is it?

Change of use from Use Class C3 (dwelling house) to Use Class C4 (HMO-house in multiple occupation).

Reference
25/01556/FUL
Type
Full
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Postcode
Council
Received
28 Apr 2025
Decision date
20 Jun 2025
Decision route
Delegated (officer)
Status
Decided
Reference
25/01556/FUL
Type
Full
Show all 14 rows
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Postcode
Council
Received
28 Apr 2025
Decision date
20 Jun 2025
Decision route
Delegated (officer)
Status
Decided
Documents

What was filed?

Document
Published
View
Officer Report
21 Aug 2025
Decision Notice
20 Jun 2025
Application Form - Without Personal Data
28 Apr 2025
EXISTING & PROPOSED GROUND FLOOR PLAN
28 Apr 2025
EXISTING & PROPOSED FIRST FLOOR PLAN
28 Apr 2025
EXISTING & PROPOSED LOFT PLAN
28 Apr 2025
ROOF PLAN - EXISTING & PROPOSED
28 Apr 2025
EXISTING & PROPOSED ELEVATIONS
28 Apr 2025
Elevation (Side) - Existing
28 Apr 2025
Section - Existing
28 Apr 2025
Officer Report
21 Aug 2025
Decision Notice
20 Jun 2025
Application Form - Without Personal Data
28 Apr 2025
Show all 10 rows
EXISTING & PROPOSED GROUND FLOOR PLAN
28 Apr 2025
EXISTING & PROPOSED FIRST FLOOR PLAN
28 Apr 2025
EXISTING & PROPOSED LOFT PLAN
28 Apr 2025
ROOF PLAN - EXISTING & PROPOSED
28 Apr 2025
EXISTING & PROPOSED ELEVATIONS
28 Apr 2025
Elevation (Side) - Existing
28 Apr 2025
Section - Existing
28 Apr 2025

Documents open on the Enfield portal (the portal needs its documents tab opened first — the link handles that). View the application page ↗

Decision

What happened?

Refused on 20 Jun 2025, delegated decision by Nurgul Kinli — 8 weeks from submission.

Timeline

Date
Event
28 Apr 2025
Application received
20 Jun 2025
Delegated decision: Refused · Nurgul Kinli
28 Apr 2025
Application received
20 Jun 2025
Delegated decision: Refused · Nurgul Kinli

Why it was refused

Reason
As stated on the decision notice
1
The development is located in Flood Zone 2 and 3 and is therefore subject to high risk of flooding. The flood depths in this area are considered too great to allow any bedrooms at ground floor level and due to an inadequate Flood Risk Assessment and source control SuDS measures the development fails to demonstrate that the proposed development would both be safe from flooding; will not increase flood risk elsewhere or demonstrate measures to manage the risk of flooding from surface water run-off and follow the drainage hierarchy in the London Plan. This is contrary to guidance in Section 14 of the National Planning Policy Framework (2021); Policies SI 12 and SI 13 of the London Plan (2021); Policy CP28 of the Core Strategy (2010) and Policies DMD59, DMD60 and DMD61 of the Development Management Document (2014). Dated: 20 June 2025 Authorised on behalf of: Karen Page Head of Planning and Building Control Housing, Regeneration and Development Department Enfield Council PO Box 53, Civic Centre Silver Street, Enfield EN1 3XE If you have any questions about this decision, please contact the planning officer Nurgul.kinli@enfield.gov.uk. List of plans and documents referred to in this Notice: Title/Number Version TYPE location plan Drawing Block Plan Drawing N.A/221SR/405 Drawing N.A/221SR/402 Drawing N.A/221SR/401 Drawing N.A/221SR/403 Drawing N.A/221SR/404 Drawing N.A/221SR/408 Drawing DESIGN AND ACCESS STATEMENT Supporting Information Flood risk assessment Supporting Information APPEAL GUIDANCE: Should you (an applicant or agent) feel aggrieved by the decision of the Council to either refuse permission or to grant permission subject to conditions, you can
1
The development is located in Flood Zone 2 and 3 and is therefore subject to high risk of flooding. The flood depths in this area are considered too great to allow any bedrooms at ground floor level and due to an inadequate Flood Risk Assessment and source control SuDS measures the development fails to demonstrate that the proposed development would both be safe from flooding; will not increase flood risk elsewhere or demonstrate measures to manage the risk of flooding from surface water run-off and follow the drainage hierarchy in the London Plan. This is contrary to guidance in Section 14 of the National Planning Policy Framework (2021); Policies SI 12 and SI 13 of the London Plan (2021); Policy CP28 of the Core Strategy (2010) and Policies DMD59, DMD60 and DMD61 of the Development Management Document (2014). Dated: 20 June 2025 Authorised on behalf of: Karen Page Head of Planning and Building Control Housing, Regeneration and Development Department Enfield Council PO Box 53, Civic Centre Silver Street, Enfield EN1 3XE If you have any questions about this decision, please contact the planning officer Nurgul.kinli@enfield.gov.uk. List of plans and documents referred to in this Notice: Title/Number Version TYPE location plan Drawing Block Plan Drawing N.A/221SR/405 Drawing N.A/221SR/402 Drawing N.A/221SR/401 Drawing N.A/221SR/403 Drawing N.A/221SR/404 Drawing N.A/221SR/408 Drawing DESIGN AND ACCESS STATEMENT Supporting Information Flood risk assessment Supporting Information APPEAL GUIDANCE: Should you (an applicant or agent) feel aggrieved by the decision of the Council to either refuse permission or to grant permission subject to conditions, you can
Policies cited
National Planning Policy Framework 14SI12SI13CP28DMD59DMD60DMD61NPPF

Public response

Comment counts were not captured for this application.

People

Who is involved?

Name
Role
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer — delegated decision
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer — delegated decision
Place

What affects it?

Context around the site — not part of this application. Designations over the site: use the map's designations filter (conservation areas, listed buildings, Article 4, flood risk …). Decisions within 250 metres of the site are listed below — context, not this application.

Other applications within 250 metres (context — nearby, not this application)

No other geocoded decision is recorded within 250 metres.