Planning application · Enfield
25/01608/HOU.
117 Conway Road London N14 7BH
Householder at 117 Conway Road London N14 7BH, received 1 May 2025 — refused on 23 Jun 2025 (delegated, Kate Vaggers).
ApprovedRefusedOther
At a glance · this applicationEnfield profile →
Refused
Outcome
23 Jun 2025
8 wks
Decision time
inside the 8-week target
—
Conditions
not captured
16
Documents
16 linked
1
Objections
0 in support
No
Appeal
none recorded
Record from the Enfield planning register as captured; documents link to the council's own files. Nearby applications are context, not part of this application.
Application
What is it?
Single storey rear extension, extension to roof at side to form gable end with rear dormer and 2x rooflights.
Reference
25/01608/HOU
Type
Householder
Applicant
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Postcode
N14 7BH
Ward
Council
Received
1 May 2025
Validated
8 May 2025
Target date
3 Jul 2025
Decision date
23 Jun 2025
Decision route
Delegated (officer)
Status
Decided
Council register
Reference
25/01608/HOU
Type
Householder
Show all 16 rows
Applicant
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Postcode
N14 7BH
Ward
Council
Received
1 May 2025
Validated
8 May 2025
Target date
3 Jul 2025
Decision date
23 Jun 2025
Decision route
Delegated (officer)
Status
Decided
Council register
Documents
What was filed?
Document
Published
View
Show all 10 rows
Documents open on the Enfield portal (the portal needs its documents tab opened first — the link handles that). View the application page ↗
Decision
What happened?
Refused on 23 Jun 2025, delegated decision by Kate Vaggers — 8 weeks from submission.
Timeline
Date
Event
1 May 2025
Application received
8 May 2025
Application validated
3 Jul 2025
Statutory target date
23 Jun 2025
Delegated decision: Refused · Kate Vaggers
1 May 2025
Application received
8 May 2025
Application validated
3 Jul 2025
Statutory target date
Show all 4 rows
23 Jun 2025
Delegated decision: Refused · Kate Vaggers
Why it was refused
Reason
As stated on the decision notice
1
The proposed hip to gable roof extension, dormer and front rooflight by reason of size, siting and
design would appear bulky and incongruous, and would represent an overly dominant, incongruous and
visually intrusive form of roof addition, unbalancing the appearance of the semi-detached pair and
would be out of keeping and character with, and detrimental to, the appearance and character of the
property and Lakes Estate Conservation Area, contrary to London Plan (2021) Policies D3, D4 and
HC1, Core Strategy (2010) Policies CP30 and CP31, Development Management Document (2014)
Policies DMD13, DMD37 and DMD44, National Planning Policy Framework (2024), as well as having
regards to the Lakes Estate Conservation Area Character Appraisal.
Dated: 23 June 2025
Authorised on behalf of:
Karen Page
Head of Planning and Building Control
Housing, Regeneration and Development Department
Enfield Council
PO Box 53, Civic Centre
Silver Street, Enfield
EN1 3XE
If you have any questions about this decision, please contact the planning officer
kate.vaggers@enfield.gov.uk.
List of plans and documents referred to in this Notice:
Title/Number Version TYPE
Location Plan A_EX_001 00 Drawing
A_PR_100 01 Drawing
A_PR_101 00 Drawing
A_PR_300 00 Drawing
A_EX_101 00 Drawing
A_EX_100 00 Drawing
A_EX_300 00 Drawing
A_PR_010 01 Drawing
Design Access Statement Drawing
Heritage Design Access Statement Drawing
Additional Information
APPEAL
Should you (an applicant or agent) feel aggrieved by the decision of the Council to either refuse
permission or to grant permission subject to conditions, you can
1
The proposed hip to gable roof extension, dormer and front rooflight by reason of size, siting and
design would appear bulky and incongruous, and would represent an overly dominant, incongruous and
visually intrusive form of roof addition, unbalancing the appearance of the semi-detached pair and
would be out of keeping and character with, and detrimental to, the appearance and character of the
property and Lakes Estate Conservation Area, contrary to London Plan (2021) Policies D3, D4 and
HC1, Core Strategy (2010) Policies CP30 and CP31, Development Management Document (2014)
Policies DMD13, DMD37 and DMD44, National Planning Policy Framework (2024), as well as having
regards to the Lakes Estate Conservation Area Character Appraisal.
Dated: 23 June 2025
Authorised on behalf of:
Karen Page
Head of Planning and Building Control
Housing, Regeneration and Development Department
Enfield Council
PO Box 53, Civic Centre
Silver Street, Enfield
EN1 3XE
If you have any questions about this decision, please contact the planning officer
kate.vaggers@enfield.gov.uk.
List of plans and documents referred to in this Notice:
Title/Number Version TYPE
Location Plan A_EX_001 00 Drawing
A_PR_100 01 Drawing
A_PR_101 00 Drawing
A_PR_300 00 Drawing
A_EX_101 00 Drawing
A_EX_100 00 Drawing
A_EX_300 00 Drawing
A_PR_010 01 Drawing
Design Access Statement Drawing
Heritage Design Access Statement Drawing
Additional Information
APPEAL
Should you (an applicant or agent) feel aggrieved by the decision of the Council to either refuse
permission or to grant permission subject to conditions, you can
Policies cited
D3D4HC1CP30CP31NPPF
Public response
Measure
Count
Objections
1
In support
0
Total comments
1
Objections
1
In support
0
Total comments
1
People
Who is involved?
Name
Role
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer — delegated decision
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer — delegated decision
Place
What affects it?
Context around the site — not part of this application. Designations over the site: use the map's designations filter (conservation areas, listed buildings, Article 4, flood risk …). Decisions within 250 metres of the site are listed below — context, not this application.
Other applications within 250 metres (context — nearby, not this application)
No other geocoded decision is recorded within 250 metres.