Planning Atlas
Planning AtlasEnfieldBullsmoor ward25/01692/HOU
Planning application · Enfield

25/01692/HOU.

16 Larches Avenue Enfield EN1 4QZ

Householder at 16 Larches Avenue Enfield EN1 4QZ, received 12 May 2025 — refused on 11 Jul 2025 (delegated, Jennie Rebairo).

EnfieldBullsmoorEN1 4QZ25/01692/HOU
ApprovedRefusedOther
At a glance · this applicationEnfield profile →
Refused
Outcome
11 Jul 2025
9 wks
Decision time
1 wks over the 8-week target
Conditions
not captured
12
Documents
12 linked
0
Objections
0 in support
No
Appeal
none recorded
Record from the Enfield planning register as captured; documents link to the council's own files. Nearby applications are context, not part of this application.
Application

What is it?

Part single storey, part two storey rear extension, two storey side extension and rear dormer with Juliette balcony and front roof lights.

Reference
25/01692/HOU
Type
Householder
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Postcode
EN1 4QZ
Council
Received
12 May 2025
Validated
28 May 2025
Target date
23 Jul 2025
Decision date
11 Jul 2025
Decision route
Delegated (officer)
Status
Decided
Reference
25/01692/HOU
Type
Householder
Show all 16 rows
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Postcode
EN1 4QZ
Council
Received
12 May 2025
Validated
28 May 2025
Target date
23 Jul 2025
Decision date
11 Jul 2025
Decision route
Delegated (officer)
Status
Decided
Documents

What was filed?

Document
Published
View
report
11 Jul 2025
Decision Notice
11 Jul 2025
proposed block plan
29 May 2025
location plan
28 May 2025
existing & proposed section
28 May 2025
location plan
28 May 2025
proposed plans
28 May 2025
suds pro forma
28 May 2025
Application Form - Without Personal Data
12 May 2025
PROPOSED FLOOR PLAN AND ELEVATIONS
12 May 2025
report
11 Jul 2025
Decision Notice
11 Jul 2025
proposed block plan
29 May 2025
Show all 10 rows
location plan
28 May 2025
existing & proposed section
28 May 2025
location plan
28 May 2025
proposed plans
28 May 2025
suds pro forma
28 May 2025
Application Form - Without Personal Data
12 May 2025
PROPOSED FLOOR PLAN AND ELEVATIONS
12 May 2025

Documents open on the Enfield portal (the portal needs its documents tab opened first — the link handles that). View the application page ↗

Decision

What happened?

Refused on 11 Jul 2025, delegated decision by Jennie Rebairo — 9 weeks from submission (1 over the 8-week target).

Timeline

Date
Event
12 May 2025
Application received
28 May 2025
Application validated
23 Jul 2025
Statutory target date
11 Jul 2025
Delegated decision: Refused · Jennie Rebairo
12 May 2025
Application received
28 May 2025
Application validated
23 Jul 2025
Statutory target date
Show all 4 rows
11 Jul 2025
Delegated decision: Refused · Jennie Rebairo

Why it was refused

Reason
As stated on the decision notice
1
The proposed extensions, by virtue of design, form, bulk, scale and siting would represent a dominant and obtrusive form of development that fails to relate to, or appear subservient to the original dwelling and would be disproportionate to the established character, form and pattern of development, detrimental to the visual amenities of the subject property and surrounding area. The proposals are thereby contrary to Policies D4 of the London Plan (2021), Core Strategy (2010) Policy CP30 and Development Management Document (2014) Policies DMD8, DMD11, DMD13, DMD14 and DMD37 and National Planning Policy Framework (2024). Dated: 11 July 2025 Authorised on behalf of: Karen Page Head of Planning and Building Control Housing, Regeneration and Development Department Enfield Council PO Box 53, Civic Centre Silver Street, Enfield EN1 3XE If you have any questions about this decision, please contact the planning officer jennie.rebairo@enfield.gov.uk. List of plans and documents referred to in this Notice: Title/Number Version TYPE Location Plan Drawing Block Plan Drawing A100 Drawing A101 Rev B Drawing A105 Drawing Additional Information APPEAL Should you (an applicant or agent) feel aggrieved by the decision of the Council to either refuse permission or to grant permission subject to conditions, you can
1
The proposed extensions, by virtue of design, form, bulk, scale and siting would represent a dominant and obtrusive form of development that fails to relate to, or appear subservient to the original dwelling and would be disproportionate to the established character, form and pattern of development, detrimental to the visual amenities of the subject property and surrounding area. The proposals are thereby contrary to Policies D4 of the London Plan (2021), Core Strategy (2010) Policy CP30 and Development Management Document (2014) Policies DMD8, DMD11, DMD13, DMD14 and DMD37 and National Planning Policy Framework (2024). Dated: 11 July 2025 Authorised on behalf of: Karen Page Head of Planning and Building Control Housing, Regeneration and Development Department Enfield Council PO Box 53, Civic Centre Silver Street, Enfield EN1 3XE If you have any questions about this decision, please contact the planning officer jennie.rebairo@enfield.gov.uk. List of plans and documents referred to in this Notice: Title/Number Version TYPE Location Plan Drawing Block Plan Drawing A100 Drawing A101 Rev B Drawing A105 Drawing Additional Information APPEAL Should you (an applicant or agent) feel aggrieved by the decision of the Council to either refuse permission or to grant permission subject to conditions, you can
Policies cited
D4CP30NPPF

Public response

Measure
Count
Objections
0
In support
0
Total comments
0
Objections
0
In support
0
Total comments
0
People

Who is involved?

Name
Role
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer — delegated decision
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer — delegated decision
Place

What affects it?

Context around the site — not part of this application. Designations over the site: use the map's designations filter (conservation areas, listed buildings, Article 4, flood risk …). Decisions within 250 metres of the site are listed below — context, not this application.

Other applications within 250 metres (context — nearby, not this application)

No other geocoded decision is recorded within 250 metres.