Planning Atlas
Planning Atlas›Enfield›…Whitewebbs wardEN2 9AA26 Clay Hill Enfield EN2 9AA›25/02145/HOU
Planning application · Enfield

25/02145/HOU.

26 Clay Hill Enfield EN2 9AA

Householder at 26 Clay Hill Enfield EN2 9AA, received 18 Jun 2025 — refused on 29 Aug 2025 (delegated, Eric Thompson).

Enfield›Whitewebbs›EN2 9AA›25/02145/HOU
ApprovedRefusedOther
At a glance · this applicationEnfield profile →
Refused
Outcome
29 Aug 2025
10 wks
Decision time
2 wks over the 8-week target
—
Conditions
not captured
29
Documents
29 linked
0
Objections
0 in support
No
Appeal
none recorded
Record from the Enfield planning register as captured; documents link to the council's own files. Nearby applications are context, not part of this application.
Application

What is it?

Single storey side/rear extension, first floor side/rear extension and single storey front extension, changes to fenestrations to all sides, alterations to roof, recladding of dwelling, relandscapting to the front, alterations to boundary treatment as associated works

Reference
25/02145/HOU
Type
Householder
Site
Applicant
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Postcode
Ward
Council
Received
18 Jun 2025
Validated
6 Jul 2025
Target date
31 Aug 2025
Decision date
29 Aug 2025
Decision route
Delegated (officer)
Status
Decided
Premises record
Council register
Reference
25/02145/HOU
Type
Householder
Site
Show all 17 rows
Applicant
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Postcode
Ward
Council
Received
18 Jun 2025
Validated
6 Jul 2025
Target date
31 Aug 2025
Decision date
29 Aug 2025
Decision route
Delegated (officer)
Status
Decided
Premises record
Council register
Documents

What was filed?

Document
Published
View
Officer Report
29 Aug 2025
Decision Notice
29 Aug 2025
Sustainable Drainage Systems Management Plan
22 Jul 2025
Minor-SuDS-Pro-forma-Planning.
22 Jul 2025
026-ALD-XX-XX-D-A-501-P1_SuDS Feature Details - Typical Rain
22 Jul 2025
026-ALD-XX-XX-D-A-500-P1_SuDS Feature Details - Typical Rain
22 Jul 2025
026-ALD-XX-XX-D-A-005-P1_Proposed SuDS Features & Drainage S
22 Jul 2025
Application Form - Without Personal Data
18 Jun 2025
The location plan
18 Jun 2025
EXISTING BLOCK PLAN
18 Jun 2025
Officer Report
29 Aug 2025
Decision Notice
29 Aug 2025
Sustainable Drainage Systems Management Plan
22 Jul 2025
Show all 10 rows
Minor-SuDS-Pro-forma-Planning.
22 Jul 2025
026-ALD-XX-XX-D-A-501-P1_SuDS Feature Details - Typical Rain
22 Jul 2025
026-ALD-XX-XX-D-A-500-P1_SuDS Feature Details - Typical Rain
22 Jul 2025
026-ALD-XX-XX-D-A-005-P1_Proposed SuDS Features & Drainage S
22 Jul 2025
Application Form - Without Personal Data
18 Jun 2025
The location plan
18 Jun 2025
EXISTING BLOCK PLAN
18 Jun 2025

Documents open on the Enfield portal (the portal needs its documents tab opened first — the link handles that). View the application page ↗

Decision

What happened?

Refused on 29 Aug 2025, delegated decision by Eric Thompson — 10 weeks from submission (2 over the 8-week target).

Timeline

Date
Event
18 Jun 2025
Application received
6 Jul 2025
Application validated
31 Aug 2025
Statutory target date
29 Aug 2025
Delegated decision: Refused · Eric Thompson
18 Jun 2025
Application received
6 Jul 2025
Application validated
31 Aug 2025
Statutory target date
Show all 4 rows
29 Aug 2025
Delegated decision: Refused · Eric Thompson

Why it was refused

Reason
As stated on the decision notice
1
The proposed two storey side extension, by virtue of its height, width, siting, bulk and proximity to the site boundary would appear visually intrusive, incongruous, overly dominant, result in the creation of a continuous facade of properties or 'terracing effect' that is out of keeping with the character and appearance of the host building and the surrounding area of which it forms part, contrary to Section 12 of the National Planning Policy Framework (2024), Policies D3 and D4, of the London Plan (2021), CP30 of the Enfield Core Strategy (2010) and DMD6, DMD8, DMD14 and DMD37 of the Enfield Development Management Document (2014). Dated: 29 August 2025 Authorised on behalf of: Karen Page Head of Planning and Building Control Housing, Regeneration and Development Department Enfield Council PO Box 53, Civic Centre Silver Street, Enfield EN1 3XE If you have any questions about this decision, please contact the planning officer eric.thompson@enfield.gov.uk. List of plans and documents referred to in this Notice: Title/Number Version TYPE 026- ALD-XX-XX-D-A-002 P1 Drawing 026- ALD-XX-XX-D-A-003 P1 Drawing 026- ALD-XX-XX-D-A-004 P1 Drawing Design and Access Statement Supporting Information 026- ALD-XX-XX-D-A-300 P1 Drawing 026- ALD-XX-XX-D-A-302 P1 Drawing 026- ALD-XX-XX-D-A-303 P1 Drawing 026- ALD-XX-XX-D-A-301 P2 Drawing 026- ALD-XX-XX-D-A-011 P1 Drawing 026- ALD-XX-XX-D-A-010 P1 Drawing 026- ALD-XX-XX-D-A-012 P1 Drawing 026- ALD-XX-XX-D-A-020 P1 Drawing 026- ALD-XX-XX-D-A-021 P1 Drawing 026- ALD-XX-XX-D-A-400 P2 Drawing 026- ALD-XX-XX-D-A-111 P1 Drawing 026- ALD-XX-XX-D-A-110 P2 Drawing 026- ALD-XX-XX-D-A-112 P1 Drawing 026- ALD-XX-XX-D-A-120 P1 Drawing 026- ALD-XX-XX-D-A-121 P1 Drawing 026- ALD-XX-XX-D-A-001 P1 Drawing 026- ALD-XX-XX-D-A-005 P1 Drawing 026- ALD-XX-XX-D-A-500 P1 Drawing 026- ALD-XX-XX-D-A-501 P1 Drawing SUDS Management Plan Supporting Information Additional Information APPEAL Should you (an applicant or agent) feel aggrieved by the decision of the Council to either refuse permission or to grant permission subject to conditions, you can
1
The proposed two storey side extension, by virtue of its height, width, siting, bulk and proximity to the site boundary would appear visually intrusive, incongruous, overly dominant, result in the creation of a continuous facade of properties or 'terracing effect' that is out of keeping with the character and appearance of the host building and the surrounding area of which it forms part, contrary to Section 12 of the National Planning Policy Framework (2024), Policies D3 and D4, of the London Plan (2021), CP30 of the Enfield Core Strategy (2010) and DMD6, DMD8, DMD14 and DMD37 of the Enfield Development Management Document (2014). Dated: 29 August 2025 Authorised on behalf of: Karen Page Head of Planning and Building Control Housing, Regeneration and Development Department Enfield Council PO Box 53, Civic Centre Silver Street, Enfield EN1 3XE If you have any questions about this decision, please contact the planning officer eric.thompson@enfield.gov.uk. List of plans and documents referred to in this Notice: Title/Number Version TYPE 026- ALD-XX-XX-D-A-002 P1 Drawing 026- ALD-XX-XX-D-A-003 P1 Drawing 026- ALD-XX-XX-D-A-004 P1 Drawing Design and Access Statement Supporting Information 026- ALD-XX-XX-D-A-300 P1 Drawing 026- ALD-XX-XX-D-A-302 P1 Drawing 026- ALD-XX-XX-D-A-303 P1 Drawing 026- ALD-XX-XX-D-A-301 P2 Drawing 026- ALD-XX-XX-D-A-011 P1 Drawing 026- ALD-XX-XX-D-A-010 P1 Drawing 026- ALD-XX-XX-D-A-012 P1 Drawing 026- ALD-XX-XX-D-A-020 P1 Drawing 026- ALD-XX-XX-D-A-021 P1 Drawing 026- ALD-XX-XX-D-A-400 P2 Drawing 026- ALD-XX-XX-D-A-111 P1 Drawing 026- ALD-XX-XX-D-A-110 P2 Drawing 026- ALD-XX-XX-D-A-112 P1 Drawing 026- ALD-XX-XX-D-A-120 P1 Drawing 026- ALD-XX-XX-D-A-121 P1 Drawing 026- ALD-XX-XX-D-A-001 P1 Drawing 026- ALD-XX-XX-D-A-005 P1 Drawing 026- ALD-XX-XX-D-A-500 P1 Drawing 026- ALD-XX-XX-D-A-501 P1 Drawing SUDS Management Plan Supporting Information Additional Information APPEAL Should you (an applicant or agent) feel aggrieved by the decision of the Council to either refuse permission or to grant permission subject to conditions, you can
Policies cited
National Planning Policy Framework 12CP30DMD6DMD8DMD14DMD37NPPF

Public response

Measure
Count
Objections
0
In support
0
Total comments
0
Objections
0
In support
0
Total comments
0
People

Who is involved?

Name
Role
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer — delegated decision
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer — delegated decision
Place

What affects it?

Context around the site — not part of this application. Designations over the site: use the map's designations filter (conservation areas, listed buildings, Article 4, flood risk …). Decisions within 250 metres of the site are listed below — context, not this application.

Other applications within 250 metres (context — nearby, not this application)

No other geocoded decision is recorded within 250 metres.