Planning application · Enfield
25/02404/HOU.
18 Hillfield Park London N21 3QH
Householder at 18 Hillfield Park London N21 3QH, received 10 Jul 2025 — refused on 17 Sep 2025 (delegated, Jennie Rebairo).
ApprovedRefusedOther
At a glance · this applicationEnfield profile →
Refused
Outcome
17 Sep 2025
10 wks
Decision time
2 wks over the 8-week target
—
Conditions
not captured
12
Documents
12 linked
0
Objections
0 in support
No
Appeal
none recorded
Record from the Enfield planning register as captured; documents link to the council's own files. Nearby applications are context, not part of this application.
Application
What is it?
Erection of new electronically controlled gates and alterations to boundary walls and railings.
Reference
25/02404/HOU
Type
Householder
Applicant
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Postcode
Ward
Council
Received
10 Jul 2025
Validated
12 Aug 2025
Target date
7 Oct 2025
Decision date
17 Sep 2025
Decision route
Delegated (officer)
Status
Decided
Premises record
Council register
Reference
25/02404/HOU
Type
Householder
Show all 17 rows
Applicant
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Postcode
Ward
Council
Received
10 Jul 2025
Validated
12 Aug 2025
Target date
7 Oct 2025
Decision date
17 Sep 2025
Decision route
Delegated (officer)
Status
Decided
Premises record
Council register
Documents
What was filed?
Document
Published
View
Show all 10 rows
Documents open on the Enfield portal (the portal needs its documents tab opened first — the link handles that). View the application page ↗
Decision
What happened?
Refused on 17 Sep 2025, delegated decision by Jennie Rebairo — 10 weeks from submission (2 over the 8-week target).
Timeline
Date
Event
10 Jul 2025
Application received
12 Aug 2025
Application validated
7 Oct 2025
Statutory target date
17 Sep 2025
Delegated decision: Refused · Jennie Rebairo
10 Jul 2025
Application received
12 Aug 2025
Application validated
7 Oct 2025
Statutory target date
Show all 4 rows
17 Sep 2025
Delegated decision: Refused · Jennie Rebairo
Why it was refused
Reason
As stated on the decision notice
1
The front boundary wall, piers and gates, by virtue of their siting, height and design, would
represent a significantly dominant and harmful boundary treatment which would be out of keeping with
the prevailing open character and appearance of the surrounding area, contrary to Policy D3 of the
London Plan 2021, CP 30 of the Enfield Core Strategy 2010, DMD 8 and DMD 37 of the Enfield
Development Management Document 2014 and National Planning Policy Framework (2024).
Dated: 17 September 2025
Authorised on behalf of:
Karen Page
Head of Planning and Building Control
Housing, Regeneration and Development Department
Enfield Council
PO Box 53, Civic Centre
Silver Street, Enfield
EN1 3XE
If you have any questions about this decision, please contact the planning officer
jennie.rebairo@enfield.gov.uk.
List of plans and documents referred to in this Notice:
Title/Number Version TYPE
Location Plan Drawing
Block Plan 24027_002 Drawing
24027_003 Drawing
24027_004 Drawing
Planning Statement Supporting Information
Additional Information
Enfield Planning Service adopts a
1
The front boundary wall, piers and gates, by virtue of their siting, height and design, would
represent a significantly dominant and harmful boundary treatment which would be out of keeping with
the prevailing open character and appearance of the surrounding area, contrary to Policy D3 of the
London Plan 2021, CP 30 of the Enfield Core Strategy 2010, DMD 8 and DMD 37 of the Enfield
Development Management Document 2014 and National Planning Policy Framework (2024).
Dated: 17 September 2025
Authorised on behalf of:
Karen Page
Head of Planning and Building Control
Housing, Regeneration and Development Department
Enfield Council
PO Box 53, Civic Centre
Silver Street, Enfield
EN1 3XE
If you have any questions about this decision, please contact the planning officer
jennie.rebairo@enfield.gov.uk.
List of plans and documents referred to in this Notice:
Title/Number Version TYPE
Location Plan Drawing
Block Plan 24027_002 Drawing
24027_003 Drawing
24027_004 Drawing
Planning Statement Supporting Information
Additional Information
Enfield Planning Service adopts a
Policies cited
D3CP30DMD8DMD37NPPF
Public response
Measure
Count
Objections
0
In support
0
Total comments
0
Objections
0
In support
0
Total comments
0
People
Who is involved?
Name
Role
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer — delegated decision
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer — delegated decision
Place
What affects it?
Context around the site — not part of this application. Designations over the site: use the map's designations filter (conservation areas, listed buildings, Article 4, flood risk …). Decisions within 250 metres of the site are listed below — context, not this application.
Other applications within 250 metres (context — nearby, not this application)
No other geocoded decision is recorded within 250 metres.