Planning Atlas
Planning AtlasEnfieldPalmers Green ward25/03408/HOU
Planning application · Enfield

25/03408/HOU.

70 The Grove London N13 5JR

Householder at 70 The Grove London N13 5JR, received 2 Oct 2025 — refused on 5 Dec 2025 (delegated, Kate Vaggers).

EnfieldPalmers GreenN13 5JR25/03408/HOU
ApprovedRefusedOther
At a glance · this applicationEnfield profile →
Refused
Outcome
5 Dec 2025
9 wks
Decision time
1 wks over the 8-week target
Conditions
not captured
7
Documents
7 linked
0
Objections
0 in support
No
Appeal
none recorded
Record from the Enfield planning register as captured; documents link to the council's own files. Nearby applications are context, not part of this application.
Application

What is it?

Construction of hard standing in connection with vehicular access.�

Reference
25/03408/HOU
Type
Householder
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Postcode
N13 5JR
Council
Received
2 Oct 2025
Validated
13 Oct 2025
Target date
8 Dec 2025
Decision date
5 Dec 2025
Decision route
Delegated (officer)
Status
Decided
Reference
25/03408/HOU
Type
Householder
Show all 16 rows
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Postcode
N13 5JR
Council
Received
2 Oct 2025
Validated
13 Oct 2025
Target date
8 Dec 2025
Decision date
5 Dec 2025
Decision route
Delegated (officer)
Status
Decided
Documents

What was filed?

Document
Published
View
Decision Notice
5 Dec 2025
REPORT
5 Dec 2025
proposed block plan, plans and elevations plans
17 Oct 2025
cil form
17 Oct 2025
Application Form - Without Personal Data
2 Oct 2025
The location plan
2 Oct 2025
EXISTING BLOCK PLAN
2 Oct 2025
Decision Notice
5 Dec 2025
REPORT
5 Dec 2025
proposed block plan, plans and elevations plans
17 Oct 2025
Show all 7 rows
cil form
17 Oct 2025
Application Form - Without Personal Data
2 Oct 2025
The location plan
2 Oct 2025
EXISTING BLOCK PLAN
2 Oct 2025

Documents open on the Enfield portal (the portal needs its documents tab opened first — the link handles that). View the application page ↗

Decision

What happened?

Refused on 5 Dec 2025, delegated decision by Kate Vaggers — 9 weeks from submission (1 over the 8-week target).

Timeline

Date
Event
2 Oct 2025
Application received
13 Oct 2025
Application validated
8 Dec 2025
Statutory target date
5 Dec 2025
Delegated decision: Refused · Kate Vaggers
2 Oct 2025
Application received
13 Oct 2025
Application validated
8 Dec 2025
Statutory target date
Show all 4 rows
5 Dec 2025
Delegated decision: Refused · Kate Vaggers

Why it was refused

Reason
As stated on the decision notice
1
The proposed vehicular crossover does not demonstrate sufficient separation from the existing established street tree and would therefore compromise the heath of the street tree and the subsequent long-term survival of the tree, which would significantly undermine the visual amenity of the surrounding area. The proposal also does not sufficiently demonstrate that the tree would not cause obstruction issues thus compromising the visibility of entering and exiting the site safely. The proposal would be contrary to Policy D3 of the London Plan (2021), Core Strategy (2010) Policy CP30, Development Management Document (2014) Policies DMD46 and DMD80 and National Planning Policy Framework (2024). Dated: 5 December 2025 Authorised on behalf of: Karen Page Head of Planning and Building Control Housing, Regeneration and Development Department Enfield Council PO Box 53, Civic Centre Silver Street, Enfield EN1 3XE If you have any questions about this decision, please contact the planning officer kate.vaggers@enfield.gov.uk. List of plans and documents referred to in this Notice: Title/Number Version TYPE Location Plan Drawing Block Plan Drawing 70TG DK PP001 A Drawing 70TG DK PP002 C Drawing 70TG DK PP003 A Drawing 70TG DK PP004 A Drawing 70TG DK PP005 C Drawing Additional Information APPEAL Should you (an applicant or agent) feel aggrieved by the decision of the Council to either refuse permission or to grant permission subject to conditions, you can
1
The proposed vehicular crossover does not demonstrate sufficient separation from the existing established street tree and would therefore compromise the heath of the street tree and the subsequent long-term survival of the tree, which would significantly undermine the visual amenity of the surrounding area. The proposal also does not sufficiently demonstrate that the tree would not cause obstruction issues thus compromising the visibility of entering and exiting the site safely. The proposal would be contrary to Policy D3 of the London Plan (2021), Core Strategy (2010) Policy CP30, Development Management Document (2014) Policies DMD46 and DMD80 and National Planning Policy Framework (2024). Dated: 5 December 2025 Authorised on behalf of: Karen Page Head of Planning and Building Control Housing, Regeneration and Development Department Enfield Council PO Box 53, Civic Centre Silver Street, Enfield EN1 3XE If you have any questions about this decision, please contact the planning officer kate.vaggers@enfield.gov.uk. List of plans and documents referred to in this Notice: Title/Number Version TYPE Location Plan Drawing Block Plan Drawing 70TG DK PP001 A Drawing 70TG DK PP002 C Drawing 70TG DK PP003 A Drawing 70TG DK PP004 A Drawing 70TG DK PP005 C Drawing Additional Information APPEAL Should you (an applicant or agent) feel aggrieved by the decision of the Council to either refuse permission or to grant permission subject to conditions, you can
Policies cited
D3CP30NPPF

Public response

Measure
Count
Objections
0
In support
0
Total comments
0
Objections
0
In support
0
Total comments
0
People

Who is involved?

Name
Role
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer — delegated decision
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer — delegated decision
Place

What affects it?

Context around the site — not part of this application. Designations over the site: use the map's designations filter (conservation areas, listed buildings, Article 4, flood risk …). Decisions within 250 metres of the site are listed below — context, not this application.

Other applications within 250 metres (context — nearby, not this application)

No other geocoded decision is recorded within 250 metres.