Planning application · Enfield
25/03840/HOU.
Householder at 24 Greenway London N14 6NN, received 6 Nov 2025 — refused on 29 Jan 2026 (delegated, Mahboubeh Bahrami-Jovein).
ApprovedRefusedOther
At a glance · this applicationEnfield profile →
Refused
Outcome
29 Jan 2026
12 wks
Decision time
4 wks over the 8-week target
—
Conditions
not captured
17
Documents
17 linked
0
Objections
0 in support
No
Appeal
none recorded
Record from the Enfield planning register as captured; documents link to the council's own files. Nearby applications are context, not part of this application.
Application
What is it?
Part single, part two storey rear extension with associated roof alterations involving enlargement of the rear ground floor window and alterations to the existing raised rear patio.
Reference
25/03840/HOU
Type
Householder
Applicant
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Postcode
N14 6NN
Ward
Council
Received
6 Nov 2025
Validated
20 Nov 2025
Target date
15 Jan 2026
Decision date
29 Jan 2026
Decision route
Delegated (officer)
Status
Decided
Council register
Reference
25/03840/HOU
Type
Householder
Show all 16 rows
Applicant
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Postcode
N14 6NN
Ward
Council
Received
6 Nov 2025
Validated
20 Nov 2025
Target date
15 Jan 2026
Decision date
29 Jan 2026
Decision route
Delegated (officer)
Status
Decided
Council register
Documents
What was filed?
Document
Published
View
Documents open on the Enfield portal (the portal needs its documents tab opened first — the link handles that). View the application page ↗
Decision
What happened?
Refused on 29 Jan 2026, delegated decision by Mahboubeh Bahrami-Jovein — 12 weeks from submission (4 over the 8-week target).
Timeline
Date
Event
6 Nov 2025
Application received
20 Nov 2025
Application validated
15 Jan 2026
Statutory target date
29 Jan 2026
Delegated decision: Refused · Mahboubeh Bahrami-Jovein
6 Nov 2025
Application received
20 Nov 2025
Application validated
15 Jan 2026
Statutory target date
Show all 4 rows
29 Jan 2026
Delegated decision: Refused · Mahboubeh Bahrami-Jovein
Why it was refused
Reason
As stated on the decision notice
1
The proposed development, by virtue of the detailed design, scale, siting, materials and form,
together with the removal of the visual break between the subject site and adjoining neighbour, would
give rise to an awkward, incongruous, bulky and overbearing form of over-development that would be
to the detriment of the dwelling and would neither protect nor enhance the conservation area. The
proposal would fail to preserve or enhance the character and appearance of the Conservation Area
contrary to Section 72(1) of the Planning (Listed Buildings and Conservation Areas) Act 1990. The harm
caused is not outweighed by public benefits and therefore fails to accord with Section 16 of the National
Planning Policy Framework 2024; Policy HC1 of the London Plan 2021; Policy 44 of the DMD 2014;
Policy 31 of the Core Strategy 2010.
2
The proposed first floor rear extension, by reason of its design, scale and siting would give rise
to an unacceptable loss of amenity to the occupiers of no. 26 Greenway, contrary to policies DMD11
and DMD37 of the Development Management Document 2014 and CP30 of the Core Strategy 2010.
Dated: 29 January 2026
Authorised on behalf of:
Karen Page
Head of Planning and Building Control
Housing, Regeneration and Development Department
Enfield Council
PO Box 53, Civic Centre
Silver Street, Enfield
EN1 3XE
If you have any questions about this decision, please contact the planning officer mahboubeh.bahrami-
jovein@enfield.gov.uk.
List of plans and documents referred to in this Notice:
Title/Number Version TYPE
001 Drawing
010 Drawing
011 Drawing
012 Drawing
013 Drawing
014 Drawing
015 Drawing
016 Drawing
017 Drawing
ARBORICULTURAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT Supporting Information
COVERING LETTER Supporting Information
DESIGN AND ACCESS STATEMENT Supporting Information
HERITAGE STATEMENT Supporting Information
Photographs Supporting Information
Additional Information
The Planning Authority offers a preapplication service to assist developers with their development
proposals. Our dedicated Conservation Team will be able to provide guidance on how to extend the
property in line with our requirements. Development planners can assist with all other planning matters.
More information can be found at: https://www.enfield.gov.uk/services/planning/planning-pre-
application-advice-service
APPEAL
Should you (an applicant or agent) feel aggrieved by the decision of the Council to either refuse
permission or to grant permission subject to conditions, you can
1
The proposed development, by virtue of the detailed design, scale, siting, materials and form,
together with the removal of the visual break between the subject site and adjoining neighbour, would
give rise to an awkward, incongruous, bulky and overbearing form of over-development that would be
to the detriment of the dwelling and would neither protect nor enhance the conservation area. The
proposal would fail to preserve or enhance the character and appearance of the Conservation Area
contrary to Section 72(1) of the Planning (Listed Buildings and Conservation Areas) Act 1990. The harm
caused is not outweighed by public benefits and therefore fails to accord with Section 16 of the National
Planning Policy Framework 2024; Policy HC1 of the London Plan 2021; Policy 44 of the DMD 2014;
Policy 31 of the Core Strategy 2010.
2
The proposed first floor rear extension, by reason of its design, scale and siting would give rise
to an unacceptable loss of amenity to the occupiers of no. 26 Greenway, contrary to policies DMD11
and DMD37 of the Development Management Document 2014 and CP30 of the Core Strategy 2010.
Dated: 29 January 2026
Authorised on behalf of:
Karen Page
Head of Planning and Building Control
Housing, Regeneration and Development Department
Enfield Council
PO Box 53, Civic Centre
Silver Street, Enfield
EN1 3XE
If you have any questions about this decision, please contact the planning officer mahboubeh.bahrami-
jovein@enfield.gov.uk.
List of plans and documents referred to in this Notice:
Title/Number Version TYPE
001 Drawing
010 Drawing
011 Drawing
012 Drawing
013 Drawing
014 Drawing
015 Drawing
016 Drawing
017 Drawing
ARBORICULTURAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT Supporting Information
COVERING LETTER Supporting Information
DESIGN AND ACCESS STATEMENT Supporting Information
HERITAGE STATEMENT Supporting Information
Photographs Supporting Information
Additional Information
The Planning Authority offers a preapplication service to assist developers with their development
proposals. Our dedicated Conservation Team will be able to provide guidance on how to extend the
property in line with our requirements. Development planners can assist with all other planning matters.
More information can be found at: https://www.enfield.gov.uk/services/planning/planning-pre-
application-advice-service
APPEAL
Should you (an applicant or agent) feel aggrieved by the decision of the Council to either refuse
permission or to grant permission subject to conditions, you can
Policies cited
National Planning Policy Framework 16HC1Core Strategy 31NPPFDMD11DMD37CP30
Public response
Measure
Count
Objections
0
In support
0
Total comments
0
Objections
0
In support
0
Total comments
0
People
Who is involved?
Name
Role
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer — delegated decision
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer — delegated decision
Place
What affects it?
Context around the site — not part of this application. Designations over the site: use the map's designations filter (conservation areas, listed buildings, Article 4, flood risk …). Decisions within 250 metres of the site are listed below — context, not this application.
Other applications within 250 metres (context — nearby, not this application)
No other geocoded decision is recorded within 250 metres.