Planning application · Enfield
26/00238/HOU.
Aldermans House 124 Aldermans Hill London N13 4PT
Householder at Aldermans House 124 Aldermans Hill London N13 4PT, received 22 Jan 2026 — refused on 5 Jun 2026 (delegated, Jennie Rebairo).
ApprovedRefusedOther
At a glance · this applicationEnfield profile →
Refused
Outcome
5 Jun 2026
19 wks
Decision time
11 wks over the 8-week target
—
Conditions
not captured
27
Documents
27 linked
—
Objections
not captured
No
Appeal
none recorded
Record from the Enfield planning register as captured; documents link to the council's own files. Nearby applications are context, not part of this application.
Application
What is it?
Single storey side extension to both sides of the existing front entrance porch.
Reference
26/00238/HOU
Type
Householder
Applicant
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Postcode
N13 4PT
Ward
Council
Received
22 Jan 2026
Validated
10 Apr 2026
Target date
5 Jun 2026
Decision date
5 Jun 2026
Decision route
Delegated (officer)
Status
Decided
Council register
Reference
26/00238/HOU
Type
Householder
Show all 16 rows
Applicant
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Postcode
N13 4PT
Ward
Council
Received
22 Jan 2026
Validated
10 Apr 2026
Target date
5 Jun 2026
Decision date
5 Jun 2026
Decision route
Delegated (officer)
Status
Decided
Council register
Documents
What was filed?
Document
Published
View
Show all 10 rows
Documents open on the Enfield portal (the portal needs its documents tab opened first — the link handles that). View the application page ↗
Decision
What happened?
Refused on 5 Jun 2026, delegated decision by Jennie Rebairo — 19 weeks from submission (11 over the 8-week target).
Timeline
Date
Event
22 Jan 2026
Application received
10 Apr 2026
Application validated
5 Jun 2026
Statutory target date
5 Jun 2026
Delegated decision: Refused · Jennie Rebairo
22 Jan 2026
Application received
10 Apr 2026
Application validated
5 Jun 2026
Statutory target date
Show all 4 rows
5 Jun 2026
Delegated decision: Refused · Jennie Rebairo
Why it was refused
Reason
As stated on the decision notice
1
The proposal due to its size, siting, design and loss of original fenestration would alter the
appearance and unbalance the front of the house in a visually harmful manner. The proposed
development would appear incongruous in the immediate vicinity along Aldermans Hill and would be
harmful to the character and appearance of the host dwelling and the street scene in this location. Thus
as a result fails to comply with Policy D3 of the London Plan (2021), with Policy CP30 of the Core
Strategy (2010), with Policies DMD8 and DMD37 of the Development Management Document (2014)
and National Planning Policy Framework (2024).
Dated: 5 June 2026
Authorised on behalf of:
Karen Page
Head of Planning and Building Control
Housing, Regeneration and Development Department
Enfield Council
PO Box 53, Civic Centre
Silver Street, Enfield
EN1 3XE
If you have any questions about this decision, please contact the planning officer
jennie.rebairo@enfield.gov.uk.
List of plans and documents referred to in this Notice:
Title/Number Version TYPE
Location Plan Drawing
Block Plan 105 Drawing
020 Rev P01 Drawing
021 Rev P01 Drawing
025 Rev P01 Drawing
026 Rev P01 Drawing
027 Rev P01 Drawing
010 Rev P01 Drawing
011 Rev P01 Drawing
030 Rev P01 Drawing
031 Rev P01 Drawing
125 Rev P03 Drawing
110 Rev P03 Drawing
111 Rev P02 Drawing
130 Rev P01 Drawing
131 Rev P02 Drawing
126 Rev P03 Drawing
127 Rev P02 Drawing
120 Rev P03 Drawing
121 Rev P03 Drawing
Planning Statement dated January 2026 Supporting Information
APPEAL
Should you (an applicant or agent) feel aggrieved by the decision of the Council to either refuse
permission or to grant permission subject to conditions, you can
1
The proposal due to its size, siting, design and loss of original fenestration would alter the
appearance and unbalance the front of the house in a visually harmful manner. The proposed
development would appear incongruous in the immediate vicinity along Aldermans Hill and would be
harmful to the character and appearance of the host dwelling and the street scene in this location. Thus
as a result fails to comply with Policy D3 of the London Plan (2021), with Policy CP30 of the Core
Strategy (2010), with Policies DMD8 and DMD37 of the Development Management Document (2014)
and National Planning Policy Framework (2024).
Dated: 5 June 2026
Authorised on behalf of:
Karen Page
Head of Planning and Building Control
Housing, Regeneration and Development Department
Enfield Council
PO Box 53, Civic Centre
Silver Street, Enfield
EN1 3XE
If you have any questions about this decision, please contact the planning officer
jennie.rebairo@enfield.gov.uk.
List of plans and documents referred to in this Notice:
Title/Number Version TYPE
Location Plan Drawing
Block Plan 105 Drawing
020 Rev P01 Drawing
021 Rev P01 Drawing
025 Rev P01 Drawing
026 Rev P01 Drawing
027 Rev P01 Drawing
010 Rev P01 Drawing
011 Rev P01 Drawing
030 Rev P01 Drawing
031 Rev P01 Drawing
125 Rev P03 Drawing
110 Rev P03 Drawing
111 Rev P02 Drawing
130 Rev P01 Drawing
131 Rev P02 Drawing
126 Rev P03 Drawing
127 Rev P02 Drawing
120 Rev P03 Drawing
121 Rev P03 Drawing
Planning Statement dated January 2026 Supporting Information
APPEAL
Should you (an applicant or agent) feel aggrieved by the decision of the Council to either refuse
permission or to grant permission subject to conditions, you can
Policies cited
D3CP30DMD8DMD37NPPF
Public response
Comment counts were not captured for this application.
People
Who is involved?
Name
Role
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer — delegated decision
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer — delegated decision
Place
What affects it?
Context around the site — not part of this application. Designations over the site: use the map's designations filter (conservation areas, listed buildings, Article 4, flood risk …). Decisions within 250 metres of the site are listed below — context, not this application.
Other applications within 250 metres (context — nearby, not this application)
No other geocoded decision is recorded within 250 metres.