Planning application · Enfield
26/00401/HOU.
51 Kenmare Gardens London N13 5DR
Householder at 51 Kenmare Gardens London N13 5DR, received 3 Feb 2026 — refused on 24 Mar 2026 (delegated, Jennie Rebairo).
ApprovedRefusedOther
At a glance · this applicationEnfield profile →
Refused
Outcome
24 Mar 2026
7 wks
Decision time
inside the 8-week target
—
Conditions
not captured
20
Documents
20 linked
0
Objections
0 in support
No
Appeal
none recorded
Record from the Enfield planning register as captured; documents link to the council's own files. Nearby applications are context, not part of this application.
Application
What is it?
Detached outbuilding to front. (RETROSPECTIVE).
Reference
26/00401/HOU
Type
Householder
Applicant
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Postcode
N13 5DR
Ward
Council
Received
3 Feb 2026
Validated
6 Feb 2026
Decision date
24 Mar 2026
Decision route
Delegated (officer)
Status
Decided
Council register
Reference
26/00401/HOU
Type
Householder
Show all 15 rows
Applicant
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Postcode
N13 5DR
Ward
Council
Received
3 Feb 2026
Validated
6 Feb 2026
Decision date
24 Mar 2026
Decision route
Delegated (officer)
Status
Decided
Council register
Documents
What was filed?
Document
Published
View
Show all 10 rows
Documents open on the Enfield portal (the portal needs its documents tab opened first — the link handles that). View the application page ↗
Decision
What happened?
Refused on 24 Mar 2026, delegated decision by Jennie Rebairo — 7 weeks from submission.
Timeline
Date
Event
3 Feb 2026
Application received
6 Feb 2026
Application validated
24 Mar 2026
Delegated decision: Refused · Jennie Rebairo
3 Feb 2026
Application received
6 Feb 2026
Application validated
24 Mar 2026
Delegated decision: Refused · Jennie Rebairo
Why it was refused
Reason
As stated on the decision notice
1
The outbuilding, by reason of its size, siting, height, materials and design would represent a
significantly dominant and visually discordant form of development, and out of keeping with the
prevailing open character and appearance of the surrounding area, contrary to Policy D3 of the London
Plan (2021), Policy CP30 of the Enfield Core Strategy (2010) and Policies DMD8, DMD12 and DMD37
of the Enfield Development Management Document (2014) and National Planning Policy Framework
(2024).
Dated: 24 March 2026
Authorised on behalf of:
Karen Page
Head of Planning and Building Control
Housing, Regeneration and Development Department
Enfield Council
PO Box 53, Civic Centre
Silver Street, Enfield
EN1 3XE
If you have any questions about this decision, please contact the planning officer
jennie.rebairo@enfield.gov.uk.
List of plans and documents referred to in this Notice:
Title/Number Version TYPE
HGI-2607.11 Drawing
HGI-2607.12 Drawing
HGI-2607.01 Drawing
HGI-2607.02 Drawing
HGI-2607.03 Drawing
HGI-2607.04 Drawing
HGI-2607.05 Drawing
HGI-2607.06 Drawing
HGI-2607.07 Drawing
HGI-2607.08 Drawing
HGI-2607.14 Drawing
Planning Statement Supporting Information
Additional Information
APPEAL
Should you (an applicant or agent) feel aggrieved by the decision of the Council to either refuse
permission or to grant permission subject to conditions, you can
1
The outbuilding, by reason of its size, siting, height, materials and design would represent a
significantly dominant and visually discordant form of development, and out of keeping with the
prevailing open character and appearance of the surrounding area, contrary to Policy D3 of the London
Plan (2021), Policy CP30 of the Enfield Core Strategy (2010) and Policies DMD8, DMD12 and DMD37
of the Enfield Development Management Document (2014) and National Planning Policy Framework
(2024).
Dated: 24 March 2026
Authorised on behalf of:
Karen Page
Head of Planning and Building Control
Housing, Regeneration and Development Department
Enfield Council
PO Box 53, Civic Centre
Silver Street, Enfield
EN1 3XE
If you have any questions about this decision, please contact the planning officer
jennie.rebairo@enfield.gov.uk.
List of plans and documents referred to in this Notice:
Title/Number Version TYPE
HGI-2607.11 Drawing
HGI-2607.12 Drawing
HGI-2607.01 Drawing
HGI-2607.02 Drawing
HGI-2607.03 Drawing
HGI-2607.04 Drawing
HGI-2607.05 Drawing
HGI-2607.06 Drawing
HGI-2607.07 Drawing
HGI-2607.08 Drawing
HGI-2607.14 Drawing
Planning Statement Supporting Information
Additional Information
APPEAL
Should you (an applicant or agent) feel aggrieved by the decision of the Council to either refuse
permission or to grant permission subject to conditions, you can
Policies cited
D3CP30DMD8DMD12DMD37NPPF
Public response
Measure
Count
Objections
0
In support
0
Total comments
0
Objections
0
In support
0
Total comments
0
People
Who is involved?
Name
Role
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer — delegated decision
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer — delegated decision
Place
What affects it?
Context around the site — not part of this application. Designations over the site: use the map's designations filter (conservation areas, listed buildings, Article 4, flood risk …). Decisions within 250 metres of the site are listed below — context, not this application.
Other applications within 250 metres (context — nearby, not this application)
No other geocoded decision is recorded within 250 metres.