Planning application · Enfield
26/00425/HOU.
2 Clarendon Way London N21 2LX
Householder at 2 Clarendon Way London N21 2LX, received 4 Feb 2026 — refused on 14 Apr 2026 (delegated, Jeremiah Ayerh).
ApprovedRefusedOther
At a glance · this applicationEnfield profile →
Refused
Outcome
14 Apr 2026
10 wks
Decision time
2 wks over the 8-week target
—
Conditions
not captured
22
Documents
22 linked
0
Objections
0 in support
No
Appeal
none recorded
Record from the Enfield planning register as captured; documents link to the council's own files. Nearby applications are context, not part of this application.
Application
What is it?
Single storey rear/side extension with conversion of garage into habitable room involving alterations to front elevation.
Reference
26/00425/HOU
Type
Householder
Applicant
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Postcode
N21 2LX
Ward
Council
Received
4 Feb 2026
Validated
2 Mar 2026
Target date
27 Apr 2026
Decision date
14 Apr 2026
Decision route
Delegated (officer)
Status
Decided
Council register
Reference
26/00425/HOU
Type
Householder
Show all 16 rows
Applicant
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Postcode
N21 2LX
Ward
Council
Received
4 Feb 2026
Validated
2 Mar 2026
Target date
27 Apr 2026
Decision date
14 Apr 2026
Decision route
Delegated (officer)
Status
Decided
Council register
Documents
What was filed?
Document
Published
View
Show all 10 rows
Documents open on the Enfield portal (the portal needs its documents tab opened first — the link handles that). View the application page ↗
Decision
What happened?
Refused on 14 Apr 2026, delegated decision by Jeremiah Ayerh — 10 weeks from submission (2 over the 8-week target).
Timeline
Date
Event
4 Feb 2026
Application received
2 Mar 2026
Application validated
27 Apr 2026
Statutory target date
14 Apr 2026
Delegated decision: Refused · Jeremiah Ayerh
4 Feb 2026
Application received
2 Mar 2026
Application validated
27 Apr 2026
Statutory target date
Show all 4 rows
14 Apr 2026
Delegated decision: Refused · Jeremiah Ayerh
Why it was refused
Reason
As stated on the decision notice
1
The proposed development, in absence of an adequate flood risk assessment, fails to
demonstrate how proposed measures manage the risk of flooding and utilise Sustainable Urban
Drainage Systems (SuDS) following the drainage hierarchy in the London Plan. The proposal is
therefore contrary to Section 14 of the National Planning Policy Framework (2024), to policies SI12 and
SI 13 of the London Plan (2021), to policies CP21 and CP28 of the Enfield Core Strategy (2010), to
policies DMD59, DMD60 and DMD61 of the Enfield Development Management Document (2014), and
the Enfield Strategic Flood Risk Assessment.
Dated: 14 April 2026
Authorised on behalf of:
Karen Page
Head of Planning and Building Control
Housing, Regeneration and Development Department
Enfield Council
PO Box 53, Civic Centre
Silver Street, Enfield
EN1 3XE
If you have any questions about this decision, please contact the planning officer
Jeremiah.ayerh@enfield.gov.uk.
List of plans and documents referred to in this Notice:
Title/Number Version TYPE
390/02E Drawing
390/52K Drawing
390/52E Drawing
390/54D Drawing
390/55 Drawing
390/56 Drawing
390/01H Drawing
390/57A Drawing
390/00C Drawing
390/10C Drawing
Flood Risk Assessment Supporting Information
Appendix A Site Location Maps Supporting Information
Appendix C Geological Map Supporting Information
Appendix D Topographic Map Supporting Information
Appendix E Environment Agency's Flood Maps Supporting Information
Flood Evacuation Plan Supporting Information
Additional Information
APPEAL
Should you (an applicant or agent) feel aggrieved by the decision of the Council to either refuse
permission or to grant permission subject to conditions, you can
1
The proposed development, in absence of an adequate flood risk assessment, fails to
demonstrate how proposed measures manage the risk of flooding and utilise Sustainable Urban
Drainage Systems (SuDS) following the drainage hierarchy in the London Plan. The proposal is
therefore contrary to Section 14 of the National Planning Policy Framework (2024), to policies SI12 and
SI 13 of the London Plan (2021), to policies CP21 and CP28 of the Enfield Core Strategy (2010), to
policies DMD59, DMD60 and DMD61 of the Enfield Development Management Document (2014), and
the Enfield Strategic Flood Risk Assessment.
Dated: 14 April 2026
Authorised on behalf of:
Karen Page
Head of Planning and Building Control
Housing, Regeneration and Development Department
Enfield Council
PO Box 53, Civic Centre
Silver Street, Enfield
EN1 3XE
If you have any questions about this decision, please contact the planning officer
Jeremiah.ayerh@enfield.gov.uk.
List of plans and documents referred to in this Notice:
Title/Number Version TYPE
390/02E Drawing
390/52K Drawing
390/52E Drawing
390/54D Drawing
390/55 Drawing
390/56 Drawing
390/01H Drawing
390/57A Drawing
390/00C Drawing
390/10C Drawing
Flood Risk Assessment Supporting Information
Appendix A Site Location Maps Supporting Information
Appendix C Geological Map Supporting Information
Appendix D Topographic Map Supporting Information
Appendix E Environment Agency's Flood Maps Supporting Information
Flood Evacuation Plan Supporting Information
Additional Information
APPEAL
Should you (an applicant or agent) feel aggrieved by the decision of the Council to either refuse
permission or to grant permission subject to conditions, you can
Policies cited
National Planning Policy Framework 14SI12SI13CP21CP28DMD59DMD60DMD61NPPF
Public response
Measure
Count
Objections
0
In support
0
Total comments
0
Objections
0
In support
0
Total comments
0
People
Who is involved?
Name
Role
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer — delegated decision
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer — delegated decision
Place
What affects it?
Context around the site — not part of this application. Designations over the site: use the map's designations filter (conservation areas, listed buildings, Article 4, flood risk …). Decisions within 250 metres of the site are listed below — context, not this application.
Other applications within 250 metres (context — nearby, not this application)
No other geocoded decision is recorded within 250 metres.