Planning Atlas
Planning AtlasEnfieldWinchmore ward26/00622/HOU
Planning application · Enfield

26/00622/HOU.

4 Woodland Way London N21 3QA

Householder at 4 Woodland Way London N21 3QA, received 18 Feb 2026 — approved on 27 Apr 2026 (delegated, Kate Vaggers).

EnfieldWinchmoreN21 3QA26/00622/HOU
ApprovedRefusedOther
At a glance · this applicationEnfield profile →
Approved
Outcome
27 Apr 2026
10 wks
Decision time
2 wks over the 8-week target
Conditions
not captured
0
Documents
on the council file
0
Objections
0 in support
No
Appeal
none recorded
Record from the Enfield planning register as captured; documents link to the council's own files. Nearby applications are context, not part of this application.
Application

What is it?

Single storey rear extension, rear dormer with Juliette balcony and replacement of windows to property.

Reference
26/00622/HOU
Type
Householder
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Postcode
N21 3QA
Council
Received
18 Feb 2026
Validated
9 Mar 2026
Target date
4 May 2026
Decision date
27 Apr 2026
Decision route
Delegated (officer)
Status
Decided
Reference
26/00622/HOU
Type
Householder
Show all 16 rows
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Postcode
N21 3QA
Council
Received
18 Feb 2026
Validated
9 Mar 2026
Target date
4 May 2026
Decision date
27 Apr 2026
Decision route
Delegated (officer)
Status
Decided
Documents

What was filed?

No documents are recorded for this application.

Documents open on the Enfield portal (the portal needs its documents tab opened first — the link handles that). View the application page ↗

Decision

What happened?

Approved on 27 Apr 2026, delegated decision by Kate Vaggers — 10 weeks from submission (2 over the 8-week target).

Timeline

Date
Event
18 Feb 2026
Application received
9 Mar 2026
Application validated
4 May 2026
Statutory target date
27 Apr 2026
Delegated decision: Approved · Kate Vaggers
18 Feb 2026
Application received
9 Mar 2026
Application validated
4 May 2026
Statutory target date
Show all 4 rows
27 Apr 2026
Delegated decision: Approved · Kate Vaggers

Public response

Measure
Count
Objections
0
In support
0
Total comments
0
Objections
0
In support
0
Total comments
0
People

Who is involved?

Name
Role
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer — delegated decision
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer — delegated decision
Place

What affects it?

Context around the site — not part of this application. Designations over the site: use the map's designations filter (conservation areas, listed buildings, Article 4, flood risk …). Decisions within 250 metres of the site are listed below — context, not this application.

Other applications within 250 metres (context — nearby, not this application)

No other geocoded decision is recorded within 250 metres.